A48o — Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 Bg7 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bK
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bN
bP
Case forte (2v0)
wBFou actif — mobilité 7
wPPion central
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wN
wQ
wK
wB
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. Nbd2 (Développer b1 — 76 % des parties) ; e3 (Libérer Bf1, préparer Bd3 — 13 % des parties) ; c3 (Renforcer le centre — 8 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wB
wK
wQ
wN
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
wB
bP
bN
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bK
bQ
bB
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 39 % des parties) ; ...d5 (Occuper le centre — 28 % des parties) ; ...d6 (Libérer Bc8 — 18 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 9 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● e5 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (2v0), ● e5 (2v0) ● d5 (1v0), ● e4 (1v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bg5 ● Bg5 Actif (mob. 7)
Bg7 ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 4 (● b1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● …c7-c5, ● …e7-e5
├── A48q - 4.Nbd2 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1927) [+0.10] · 263 parties (dont 116 ici)
│ └── A48r - 4…O-O - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1926) [+0.20] · 147 parties (dont 35 ici)
│ ├── A48v - 5.c3 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1968) [+0.02] · 84 parties (dont 7 ici)
│ │ └── A48v - 5…d6 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1955) [+0.11] · 77 parties (dont 15 ici)
│ │ └── A48w - 6.e4 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1947) [+0.04] · 62 parties (dont 33 ici)
│ │ └── A48x - 6…c5 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1956) [-0.01] · 29 parties
│ └── A48s - 5.e4 - Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack [-0.12] · 28 parties

A48o — Neo-King’s Indian: Torre Attack (1960)
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.Bg5 Bg7
Les coups candidats
Ambassadeurs : Piankov, Evgenij (100x), Kosic, Dragan (81x), Plachetka, Jan (70x), Eperjesi, Laszlo Dr. (69x), Sosna, Jan (56x), Malaniuk, Vladimir P (52x), Rozic, Vesna (46x), Trifunovic, Petar (44x)
Ambassadeurs : Kovacevic, Vlatko (57x), Kalule Wegna (32x), Deviatkin, Andrei (18x), Ballmann, Martin (17x), Bulic, Josip (17x), Kmiecik, Klaus (16x), Gereben, Erno (12x), Kovacevic, Vladimir (12x)
Ambassadeurs : Karlik, Vladimir (32x), Toth, Janos (25x), Malakhatko, Vadim (23x), Sergeev, Vladimir (18x), Kamsky, Gata (18x), Papadopoulou, Triantafilia (16x), Pavlov, Mark (14x), Chasovnikova, Eugenia (12x)
Ambassadeurs : Rakic, Tomislav (13x), Sarto Ramos, Angel (4x), Radnoti, Bela (4x), Krainov, Alexey (4x), Turi, Samuel (3x), Honkakoski, Paavo Ilmari (3x), Mical, J (2x), Paszek, Adam (2x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 4.Nbd2 4.e3 4.c3 4.Nc3
<1800 1199 60% 25% 6% 3%
1800-2200 8912 73% 16% 7% 2%
2200-2600 10114 82% 8% 9% 1%
2600+ 332 77% 7% 16%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 4.Nbd2 4.e3 4.c3 4.Nc3
1950s 78 90% 8% 1% 1%
1960s 309 88% 9% 1% 1%
1970s 260 81% 14% 3% 0%
1980s 1302 80% 8% 8% 2%
1990s 6752 77% 13% 7% 1%
2000s 6771 74% 14% 8% 2%
2010s 6657 74% 13% 8% 2%
2020s 1686 79% 11% 7% 1%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
4.Nbd2 74% 79% ▲ +4.8%
4.e3 13% 11% ▼ -2.6%
4.c3 8% 7% ▼ -0.6%
4.Nc3 2% 1% ▼ -0.7%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Kasparov, Garry — 10 parties
Carlsen, Magnus — 10 parties
Kramnik, Vladimir — 10 parties
Smyslov, Vladimir — 7 parties
Ju, Wenjun — 7 parties
Anand, Viswanathan — 6 parties
Ding, Liren — 6 parties
Tal, Mikhail — 4 parties
Karpov, Anatoly — 2 parties
Gukesh D — 2 parties
Smyslov, Vassily — 1 partie
Parties historiques
4.Nbd2 — 75.7% (18030 parties)
1950 — Konstantinopolsky, Alexander vs Geller, Efim P. — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1950 — Chistiakov, Alexander vs Fridstein, Grigory — 1-0 — Moscow RUS
1950 — Book, Eero vs Poulsen, Christian — 1-0 — Dubrovnik olm
1951 — Trifunovic, Petar vs Bertok, Mario Jr. — 1-0 — Sarajevo BIH
1951 — Trifunovic, Aleksandar vs Janosevic, Ilija — 1/2-1/2 — Yugoslavia ch
4.e3 — 13.0% (3100 parties)
1951 — Gereben, Erno vs Benko, Pal — 1-0 — Hungary ch
1952 — Palda, Karl vs Primavera, Giuseppe — 1/2-1/2 — Helsinki olm
1956 — Moller, Baldur Helgi vs Ader Hausman, Walter — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1958 — Fernandez, Bernardo vs Ramirez, Alfredo — 1/2-1/2 — Pereira
1958 — Petrosian, Tigran V. vs Furman, Semyon — 1-0 — Riga ch-URS
4.c3 — 7.5% (1781 parties)
1958 — Bronstein, David I vs Albareda, Miguel — 1-0 — Munich GER
1965 — Bielicki, Carlos vs Schroeder, Elisa — 0-1 — Santiago de Chile
1966 — Basman, Michael John vs Ciocaltea, Victor — 1-0 — Bognor Regis
1967 — Mott-McGrath, Marion vs Konarkowska-Sokolov, Henrijeta — 1/2-1/2 — Subotica SRB
1971 — Damjanovic, Mato vs Zuckerman, Bernard — 1/2-1/2 — Netanya Netanya ISR
4.Nc3 — 1.5% (367 parties)
1958 — Mackay, GD. vs Andersen, Borge — 0-1 — Bognor Regis
1962 — Cafferty, Bernard vs Littlewood, John E — 0-1 — Whitby ch-BCF
1966 — Papenbrock, Volker vs Humburg, Christoph — 0-1 — Frankfurt GER
1974 — Stark, Peter vs Rousseau, Daniel — 1-0 — Montreal CAN
1980 — Rakic, Tomislav vs Sznapik, Aleksander — 1/2-1/2 — Warszawa Cup