Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	● d6→e5, c7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (3v1), ● g5 (2v0)	● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (2v1), ● d5 (3v1), ● e5 (2v1)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Be2	● Be2 Ok (mob. 2)
Bg7		● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	3 (● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	3 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Roqué
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c4-c5	● …c7-c5, ● …d6-d5

E92a — King’s Indian: 6.Be2 e5

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5 ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 68 % des parties) ; d5 (Occuper le centre — 14 % des parties) ; Be3 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 9 % des parties) ; dxe5 (Capture en e5, Occuper le centre — 8 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 48 % des parties) ; ...Nbd7 (Développer b8 — 16 % des parties) ; ...a5 (6 % des parties) ; ...exd4 (Capture en d4, Occuper le centre — 6 % des parties) ; ...Na6 (Développer b8 — 5 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1950 Dubrovnik olm – Round 1 – Devos, Paul – 1/2-1/2 – Prins, Lodewijk – G32 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. h3 Nc6 8. Be3 exd4 9. Nxd4 Re8 10. Nxc6 bxc6
1960 Paignton Premier 10th – Round 4 – Mardle, Denis – 1-0 – Girling, Clive F – G15 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 Nbd7 8. Qd2 Re8 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Rd1 c6
1961 New York ch-USA – Round 9 – Weinstein, Raymond – 1/2-1/2 – Evans Lianda – G43 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Be2 O-O 6. Nf3 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Nbd7 9. Qd2 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nxe4
1962 Kiev (Ukraine) – Round 12 – Kots, Yuri I – 1-0 – Adler, Viktor – G22 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Nbd7 9. O-O g5 10. Bg3 Nh5
1963 Alekhine Memorial – Round 6 – Simagin, Vladimir – 1/2-1/2 – Balcerowski, Witold – G39 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 exd4 8. Nxd4 Nc6 9. Nc2 h6 10. Bh4 g5
1963 JUG-URS – Round ? – Simagin, Vladimir – 1/2-1/2 – Gligorić, Svetozar – G22 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 exd4 9. Nxd4 Nc6 10. Nc2 Re8
1964 Bordeaux Open – Round 10 – Chaude de Silans, Chantal – 0-1 – Zinser, Sylvain – G33 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 Nbd7 8. dxe5 dxe5 9. Qc2 c6 10. Rd1 Qe7
1964 Tel Aviv olm prel – Round 4 – Viner, Phillip – 0-1 – Jansa, Vlastimil – G140 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 exd4 9. Nxd4 Re8 10. f3 c6
1967 DDR Ch 16th – Round 2 – Malich, Burkhard, Dr. – 1-0 – Vogt, Lothar – G8 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 g5 9. dxe5 Nfd7 10. Bg3 dxe5
1967 Sofia tt – Round 5 – Malich, Burkhard, Dr. – 1-0 – Anastassopulos, Anastasios – G74 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 exd4 8. Nxd4 c6 9. Qd2 Qa5 10. Nb3 Qb4
1968 Kecskemet – Round 1 – Malich, Burkhard, Dr. – 1-0 – Popov, Lazar – G15 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 d6 5. e4 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 Nbd7 8. O-O h6 9. Bh4 c6 10. d5 cxd5
1968 Lugano SUI – Round 1 – Uhlmann, Wolfgang – 1/2-1/2 – Gligorić, Svetozar – G42 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Nbd7 9. O-O g5 10. dxe5 Nh5
1968 URS Team Ch – Round 1 – Pasman, Michael – 0-1 – Kapengut, Albert – G68 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Nc6 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Qxd8 Rxd8
1969 Sarajevo 12th – Round 10 – Uhlmann, Wolfgang – 1/2-1/2 – Vukic, Maroje – G14 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Bg5 Nbd7 8. O-O h6 9. Bh4 g5 10. dxe5 dxe5
Buenos Aires olm 1978 – Round 1 – Korchnoi, Viktor – 1-0 – Kavalek, Lubomir – G9 1. d4 g6 2. e4 d6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Be2 O-O 6. Nf3 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 g5 9. dxe5 gxh4 10. exf6 Qxf6
Riga Interzonal 1979 – Round 5 – Tal, Mikhail – 1/2-1/2 – Bouaziz, Slim – G11 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. e4 d6 4. d4 Bg7 5. Be2 O-O 6. Nf3 e5 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Qe8 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Nd5 Nxd5

E92a — Orthodox Variation (1950)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5

Les coups candidats

7.O-O — 63.5% (73354 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Kozul, Zdenko (236x), Ftacnik, Lubomir (201x), Van Wely, Loek (195x), Bakheet Farag (110x), Epishin, Vladimir (110x), Gleizerov, Evgeny (110x), Sakic, Radislav (102x), Cebalo, Miso (98x)

7.d5 — 14.6% (16889 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Naumkin, Igor (109x), Clares Huanca, Danner Saed (101x), Huss, Andreas (83x), Polak, Tomas (34x), Lugovoi, Aleksei (34x), Babula, Vlastimil (31x), Petrosian, Tigran V. (30x), Kolanek, Roman (29x)

7.Be3 — 11.6% (13447 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Shulman, Yury (73x), Grooten, Herman (57x), Shipov, Sergei (54x), Volkov, Sergey (53x), Timoscenko, Gennadij (52x), Shishkin, Vadim (46x), Adamski, Jan (39x), Sundararajan, Kidambi (38x)

7.dxe5 — 9.6% (11077 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Kolanek, Roman (50x), Kovacs, Arthur Dr. (35x), Veselsky, Jozef (35x), Acebal Muniz, Antonio (26x), Roeder, Matthias (26x), Kahn, Evarth Dr. (23x), Lacrosse, Marc (22x), Kerek, Csaba (22x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	7.O-O	7.d5	7.Be3	7.dxe5
<1800	4947	54%	21%	8%	15%
1800-2200	41272	62%	16%	9%	12%
2200-2600	53531	66%	13%	14%	7%
2600+	1922	73%	7%	17%	3%

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	7.O-O	7.d5	7.Be3	7.dxe5
1950s	526	71%	19%	2%	7%
1960s	1455	50%	30%	12%	6%
1970s	2373	60%	17%	12%	10%
1980s	5497	62%	13%	14%	10%
1990s	26160	63%	16%	9%	10%
2000s	32677	63%	13%	13%	11%
2010s	37440	65%	14%	12%	9%
2020s	9344	65%	16%	13%	7%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
7.O-O	65%	65%	-0.4%
7.d5	14%	16%	▲ +1.8%
7.Be3	12%	13%	▲ +1.0%
7.dxe5	9%	7%	▼ -2.2%

Joueurs célèbres

Champions du monde dans cette position

Tal, Mikhail — 10 parties
Kasparov, Garry — 10 parties
Karpov, Anatoly — 10 parties
Anand, Viswanathan — 10 parties
Kramnik, Vladimir — 10 parties
Carlsen, Magnus — 10 parties
Ju, Wenjun — 10 parties
Ding, Liren — 10 parties
Gukesh D — 10 parties
Botvinnik, Mikhail — 3 parties
Fischer, Robert James — 1 partie
Karpov, Aleksandr — 1 partie

Parties historiques

7.O-O — 63.5% (73354 parties)

1950 — Gligoric, Sofija vs Pilnik, Herman — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED
1950 — Rellstab, Ludwig vs Miguel, Nahuel — 0-1 — Bled SLO
1950 — Miguel, Nahuel vs Pilnik, Herman — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED
1950 — Spanjaard, Eduard vs Muhring, Willem Jan — 1-0 — NLD-ch Amsterdam NED
1950 — Spanjaard, Eduard vs Muhring, Pim — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED

7.d5 — 14.6% (16889 parties)

1950 — Arlamowski, Edward vs Szabo, Laszlo — 0-1 — Schiavno Zdroj
1950 — Szabo, Laszlo vs Boleslavsky, Isaac — 0-1 — Budapest HUN
1950 — Szabo, Laszlo vs Miguel, Nahuel — 0-1 — Budapest HUN
1951 — Pasman, Arun vs Tal, Mikhail — 1-0 — Riga LAT
1951 — Petrosian, Tigran V. vs Geller, Efim P. — 1/2-1/2 — Moskou ch-URS

7.Be3 — 11.6% (13447 parties)

1953 — Shocron, Ruben vs Miguel, Nahuel — 0-1 — Mar del Plata ARG
1954 — Lisitsin, Georgy vs Taimanov, Mark — 1/2-1/2 — Kiev UKR
1954 — Tal, Mikhail vs Keres, Paul — 0-1 — Tallinn EST
1954 — Tal, Mikhail vs Keres, Paul Petrovich — 0-1 — Tallinn EST
1954 — Lisitsin, Georgy vs Taimanov, Mark — 1/2-1/2 — Kiev ch-URS

7.dxe5 — 9.6% (11077 parties)

1950 — Primavera, Giuseppe vs Kupferstich, Moises — 1-0 — Dubrovnik olm
1950 — Greenfeld, Alon vs Geller, Efim P. — 0-1 — Schiavno Zdroj
1950 — Gruenfeld, Ernst vs Geller, Efim P. — 0-1 — Szawno Zdroj
1950 — Greenfeld, Alon vs Geller, Efim P. — 0-1 — Schiavno Zdroj
1950 — Kukovec, Ivan vs Udovcic, Mijo — 0-1 — Maribor

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →