E72d — King’s Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 c5

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 c5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. d5 (Occuper le centre — 47 % des parties) ; Nge2 (Développer g1 — 37 % des parties) ; dxc5 (Capture en c5, Frapper le centre adverse — 13 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 24 % des parties) ; ...e6 (Solidifier le centre, libérer le fou — 24 % des parties) ; ...cxd4 (Capture en d4, Occuper le centre — 11 % des parties) ; ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 10 % des parties) ; ...Na6 (Développer b8 — 7 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● f2→g3, h2→g3	● d6→c5, e7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (3v1)	● g4 (2v1)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d5 (3v1), ● e4 (2v1)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bg2	● Bg2 Ok (mob. 3)
Bg7		● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	4 (● g1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	3 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Roqué
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	● e4-e5	● …d6-d5, ● …e7-e5

Partie
1930 Hamburg GER – Round 12 – Rejfir, Josef – 1-0 – Gauffin, Thorsten – G24 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. e4 c5 7. Nge2 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Bd7 9. O-O Nc6 10. Nde2 Qc8
1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A – Round 10 – Opocensky, Karel – 1-0 – Castillo Larenas, Mariano – G192 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. d5 Nbd7 8. f4 a6 9. a4 Nb6 10. Qd3 e6
1945 AUS Ch – Round 10.3 – Koshnitsky, Gregory – 0-1 – Green Martin – G10 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. d4 d6 6. e4 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. d5 Ne5 9. b3 Bg4 10. h3 Bf3
1952 Hoogovens – Round 1 – Donner, H. – 1-0 – Van Scheltinga, Theo – G7 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d6 4. e4 Bg7 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. d5 Ne5 9. b3 Bg4 10. O-O Nf3+
1953 Bariloche – Round 1 – Gonzalez Intelangelo, Gerardo – 0-1 – Shocron, Ruben – G14 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. g3 d6 6. Bg2 c5 7. d5 a6 8. Nge2 b5 9. cxb5 axb5 10. Nxb5 Ba6
1953 Corr Golden Knights – Round ? – Chappuis, Gaston – 0-1 – Zalys, Ignas – G8 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nc3 c5 7. d5 Na6 8. f4 Nc7 9. Nf3 Bg4 10. O-O a6
1953 Mar del Plata – Round 1 – Guimard, Carlos E – 1-0 – Rossetto, Hector – G27 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. O-O cxd4 9. Nxd4 Nxe4 10. Nxc6 Nxc3
1954 Pan American Ch 2nd – Round 10 – Pomar Salamanca, Arturo – 1/2-1/2 – Evans, Larry M – G23 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. g3 d6 6. Bg2 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. d5 Na5 9. b3 a6 10. Bd2 Bd7
1956 Moskou olm – Round 1 – Argelaguer Benitez, Francesc – 0-1 – Dworzynski, Roman – G38 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. e4 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. d5 Na5 9. b3 a6 10. Bb2 Rb8
1957 Dublin zt – Round 8 – Catozzi, Mauro – 0-1 – Alexander Ronald Cheng – G61 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. e4 c5 7. d5 e6 8. Nge2 exd5 9. cxd5 Re8 10. O-O b5
1958 Munich olm fin-A – Round 5 – Golombek, Harry – 0-1 – Fuchs, Reinhart – G34 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. e4 c5 7. d5 a6 8. Nge2 e6 9. O-O exd5 10. exd5 Nbd7
1958 New York ch-USA – Round 2 – Evans Lianda – 0-1 – Byrne, David – G8 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. e4 c5 7. d5 a6 8. Nge2 e6 9. a4 exd5 10. cxd5 Nbd7
1959 CAN Ch – Round 10 – Zalys, Ignas – 0-1 – Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham – G19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. g3 d6 5. Bg2 O-O 6. e4 c5 7. dxc5 dxc5 8. Qxd8 Rxd8 9. Be3 Na6 10. Rd1 Rxd1+
1959 Madrid – Round 1 – Golombek, Harry – 1/2-1/2 – Toran Albero, Roman – G6 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. d5 Na6 8. Nge2 Nc7 9. O-O b5 10. cxb5 Rb8
1960 Leipzig olm prel – Round 8 – De Lange, Daan – 1/2-1/2 – Matanovic, Aleksandar – G261 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. d4 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. d5 Na5 9. b3 a6 10. Rb1 Rb8
1963 CSR Ch sf – Round 10.1 – Kupka, Slavoj – 1/2-1/2 – Jansa, Vlastimil – G43 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. d4 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. dxc5 dxc5 9. Be3 Be6 10. O-O 1/2-1/2
1966 La Habana olm fin-D – Round 1 – Perez Perez, Francisco Jose – 0-1 – Casa, Alex – G1 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. d4 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 c5 7. Nge2 Nc6 8. O-O Nd7 9. d5 Na5 10. b3 a6
1968 Mar del Plata ch-ARG – Round 1 – Guimard, Carlos E – 1-0 – Incutto, Carlos – G5 1. d4 g6 2. c4 d6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. g3 Nf6 5. Bg2 O-O 6. e4 c5 7. Nge2 Na6 8. O-O cxd4 9. Nxd4 Qa5 10. Nde2 Qh5

E72d — King’s Indian (1930)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 c5

Les coups candidats

7.d5 — 47.4% (181 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Rasmussen, Karsten (5x), Mulder van Leens Dijkstra, Kornelis (3x), Arregui, Alejandro (2x), Zalys, Ignas (2x), Golombek, Harry (2x), Borges Matos, Juan (2x), Aldama Degurnay, Dionisio (2x), Spiegel, Wilfried (2x)

7.Nge2 — 36.9% (141 parties)

Ambassadeurs : De Lange, Daan (2x), Guimard, Carlos E (2x), Stevanovic, Vladan S (2x), Jansa, Vlastimil (2x), Smarty, Sylvester (2x), Kupka, Slavoj (1x), Gudmundsson, Arinbjorn (1x), Matanovic, Aleksandar (1x)

7.dxc5 — 12.8% (49 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Skacel, Jan (2x), Bedford, M. (1x), MacLeod, David Munro (1x), Zalys, Ignas (1x), Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham (1x), Kramer, Gerald (1x), Weinstein, Raymond (1x), Pepper, Anthony B (1x)

7.Nf3 — 2.4% (9 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Marques, Bandos Jose (1x), Blanco Gramajo, Cesar Augusto (1x), Gonzalez, Jorge (1x), Lopez Mateo, Pedro Antonio (1x), Urankar, Hans-Peter (1x), Schlosser, Hans (1x), Longa Yauca, Javier (1x), Vazquez Igarza, Renier (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	7.d5	7.Nge2	7.dxc5	7.Nf3
<1800	26	50%	38%	4%	4%
1800-2200	160	45%	40%	12%	2%
2200-2600	99	47%	31%	18%	3%

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	7.d5	7.Nge2	7.dxc5	7.Nf3
1950s	17	59%	29%	12%	—
1960s	16	31%	50%	19%	—
1970s	8	75%	25%	—	—
1980s	23	43%	39%	13%	4%
1990s	67	42%	40%	13%	3%
2000s	84	55%	30%	13%	2%
2010s	121	40%	40%	16%	2%
2020s	46	59%	35%	4%	2%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
7.d5	40%	59%	▲ +18.2%
7.Nge2	40%	35%	▼ -5.7%
7.dxc5	16%	4%	▼ -11.4%
7.Nf3	2%	2%	-0.3%

Parties historiques

7.d5 — 47.4% (181 parties)

1953 — Gonzalez Garcia, Jose vs Shocron, Ruben — 0-1 — ?
1953 — Heikkila, Heikki vs Roessel, Frits — 0-1 — Copenhagen DEN
1953 — Chappuis, Gaston vs Zalys, Ignas — 0-1 — cr Golden Knights
1955 — Pelagio, Charles vs Zalys, Ignas — 0-1 — Montreal CAN
1957 — Catozzi, Henry vs Alexander Ronald Cheng — 0-1 — Dublin zt

7.Nge2 — 36.9% (141 parties)

1952 — Donner, Jan-Hein vs Bosch van Rosenthal, Edzard — 1-0 — Beverwijk NED
1953 — Guimard, Carlos E vs Rossetto, Hector — 1-0 — Mar del Plata ARG
1954 — Pomar Salamanca, Arturo vs Evans, Larry — 1/2-1/2 — Hollywood
1956 — Benitez Diaz, Francisco Javier vs Dworzynski, Roman — 0-1 — ?
1957 — Siegel, Markus vs Theodorovich, Ivan — 1-0 — Cleveland, OH USA

7.dxc5 — 12.8% (49 parties)

1954 — Kotov, Alexander vs Suetin, Alexey S — 1-0 — Erevan ARM
1959 — Zalys, Ignas vs Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham — 0-1 — Montreal CAN
1961 — Kramer, Gerald vs Weinstein, Raymond — 1-0 — New York ch-USA
1963 — Bedford, M. vs MacLeod, David Munro — 1-0 — Salinas CA
1965 — Pepper, Anthony B vs Collins, Richard — 0-1 — ?

7.Nf3 — 2.4% (9 parties)

1983 — Marques, Bandos Jose vs Blanco Gramajo, Cesar Augusto — 0-1 — ?
1990 — Gonzalez, Jorge vs Lopez Mateo, Pedro Antonio — 1-0 — Valencia
1994 — Urankar, Hans-Peter vs Schlosser, Hans — 0-1 — Bayern
2004 — Longa Yauca, Javier vs Vazquez Igarza, Renier — 1/2-1/2 — Madrid ESP
2007 — Kormos, Andras vs Nemeth, Sandor — 1-0 — HUN

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →