Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés — —
Pions isolés — —
Arriérés — —
Chaînes ● f2→g3, h2→g3 ● c7→d6, e7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés — —
Majorité — —
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (3v1) ● g4 (2v1)
Cases faibles — —
Centre ● d4 (1v0), ● d5 (3v1) —
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 4)
Bg7 ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● c4-c5, ● e4-e5 ● …c7-c5, ● …d6-d5, ● …e7-e5

E72a — King’s Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3 *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bK
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bP
bN
bP
Case forte (2v0)
Case forte (3v1)
wP
wPPion central
wPPion central
Case forte (2v0)
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wQ
wK
wBFou actif — mobilité 4
wN
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. Bg2 (Fianchetto, fou sur la grande diagonale — 90 % des parties) ; d5 (Occuper le centre — 4 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wN
wB
wK
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
Case forte (2v1)
wP
wP
wP
bP
bN
bP
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bK
bQ
bBFou actif — mobilité 5
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 90 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 4 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1936 Nottingham – Round 1 – Winter, William – 0-1 – Bogoljubow, Efim – G33
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nc6 6. d5 Nb8 7. Bg2 e5 8. Nge2 Nbd7 9. h3 h6 10. Be3 a5
1939 Amsterdam VARA – Round 1 – Landau, Salo – 1-0 – Flohr, Salo – G2
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nbd7 6. Bg2 e5 7. Nge2 O-O 8. O-O Re8 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1939 Buenos Aires ol prel-C – Round 7 – O'Hanlon, John – 0-1 – Molina Moller, Brando Felipe – G28
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nbd7 6. Bg2 e5 7. d5 O-O 8. Nge2 Ne8 9. O-O Nb6 10. Qd3 f5
1940 GER Ch 07th – Round 4 – Regedzinski, Teodor – 1/2-1/2 – Heinicke, Herbert – G3
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nc6 6. d5 Nb8 7. Bg2 O-O 8. Nge2 c5 9. O-O Na6 10. h3 Nc7
1946 AUS Ch – Round 5.3 – Mills, Bernard Yarnton – 1/2-1/2 – Crowl, Frank Arthur – G9
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nc6 6. d5 Nb8 7. Bg2 e5 8. Nge2 Nbd7 9. O-O O-O 10. a3 a5
1946 Nottingham ch-BCF – Round 1 – De Winter Gallegos, Willy – 1-0 – Wood, Gabriel – G14
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nbd7 6. Bg2 e5 7. Nge2 O-O 8. O-O a5 9. h3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1948 GBR Ch 35th – Round 8 – Winter, William – 0-1 – Wood, Gabriel – G21
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nbd7 6. Bg2 e5 7. Nge2 O-O 8. O-O a5 9. h3 c6 10. Be3 Qe7
1948 New York – Round 1 – Lopez Masis, Kenard Evans – 0-1 – Steiner, Herman – G5
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d6 4. e4 Bg7 5. g3 e5 6. d5 a5 7. Bg2 Na6 8. Nge2 Nc5 9. O-O O-O 10. h3 Ne8
1949 Moskou ch-URS – Round ? – Lilienthal, Andor – 1/2-1/2 – Aronin, Lev – G175
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 e5 6. d5 O-O 7. Bg2 Ne8 8. Nge2 f5 9. exf5 gxf5 10. f4 e4
1951 HUN Ch 07th – Round ? – Koberl, Ferenc – 0-1 – Szabo, Laszlo – G15
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 e5 6. Nge2 Bg4 7. dxe5 dxe5 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Bg2 Nc6 10. Bg5 h6
1951 USA-op52 – Round 2 – Evans, Larry M – 1-0 – Holt, Jonhenry David – G3
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 c6 6. Bg2 O-O 7. Nge2 Qc7 8. O-O e5 9. h3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Ne8
1952 La Habana – Round 16 – Aguilar Aleman, Diego Ignacio – 0-1 – Rossolimo, Nicolas – G10
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 e5 6. d5 O-O 7. f3 Kh8 8. Be3 Ng8 9. Qd2 Nd7 10. Bg2 a5
1952 Tampa US Open – Round 10 – Zalys, Ignas – 1-0 – Anaclerio Marquez, Leonardo – G10
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 Nbd7 6. Bg2 e5 7. Nge2 O-O 8. O-O a5 9. h3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1953 Hoogovens – Round 1 – Fuster, Glenn – 0-1 – Kramer, Hanspeter – G7
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 e5 6. d5 O-O 7. Bg2 Nbd7 8. Nge2 a5 9. O-O Nc5 10. h3 Nh5
1960 Madrid zt – Round 13 – Pomar Salamanca, Arturo – 1/2-1/2 – Gligorić, Svetozar – G95
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 c5 6. dxc5 Qa5 7. Bg2 Qxc5 8. Qe2 Nc6 9. Be3 Qa5 10. Bd2 O-O
1962 Solihull Handicap – Round ?.13 – Gregory Juma Mwangi – 1/2-1/2 – Griffiths, Peter C – G5
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. e4 d6 4. d4 Bg7 5. g3 c5 6. Nge2 cxd4 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Bg2 Nc6 9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. O-O Ba6
1970 Palma de Mallorca Interzonal – Round 12 – Reshevsky, Samuel – 1/2-1/2 – Gligoric, Svetozar – G128
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 c5 6. d5 e6 7. dxe6 Bxe6 8. Nh3 O-O 9. Nf4 Bg4 10. f3 Bc8

E72a — Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto (1936)
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3
Les coups candidats
Ambassadeurs : Petran, Peter (13x), Aigmueller, Max Ing (10x), Gawronski, Miroslaw (9x), Mulder van Leens Dijkstra, Kornelis (7x), Evans, Larry (6x), Barquette, Edson Tadeu Rodrigu (6x), Kotov, Alexander (5x), De Lange, Daan (5x)
5…c5 — 3.5% (45 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Rapaka Samuel Paul (3x), Gligoric, Sofija (2x), Gligoric, Svetozar (2x), Pomar Salamanca, Arturo (1x), Keller, Albrecht (1x), Gereben, Erno (1x), Wiedemann, Franz (1x), Schulze, Ulrich (1x)
5…Nbd7 — 2.4% (31 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Heemsoth, Hermann (2x), Benitez, Otto (1x), Etcheverry, Eduardo (1x), Zalys, Ignas (1x), Marquez Osorio Pedro Leon (1x), Winkler, Erich (1x), Quecke, Kurt (1x), Friedrich, Gerd (1x)
5…e5 — 1.4% (18 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Rodgers, Ron (1x), Avery, Peter (1x), Donner, Jan-Hein (1x), Bosch van Rosenthal, Edzard (1x), Koberl, Ferenc (1x), Szabo, Laszlo (1x), Aleman Munoz Jorge Luis (1x), Rossolimo, Nicolas (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 5…O-O 5…c5 5…Nbd7 5…e5
<1800 101 87% 2% 4% 1%
1800-2200 490 91% 3% 2% 1%
2200-2600 232 89% 7% 0% 1%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 5…O-O 5…c5 5…Nbd7 5…e5
1950s 117 89% 1% 3% 6%
1960s 55 85% 5% 4% 2%
1970s 73 89% 8% — —
1980s 53 94% 2% 4% —
1990s 296 90% 4% 1% 2%
2000s 352 86% 4% 4% 1%
2010s 271 93% 2% 1% 0%
2020s 54 89% 2% 2% 2%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
5…O-O 93% 89% ▼ -4.1%
5…c5 2% 2% -0.4%
5…Nbd7 1% 2% +0.4%
5…e5 0% 2% ▲ +1.5%
Parties historiques
5…O-O — 89.3% (1135 parties)
1950 — Chestnov, Vitaliy A. vs Tarasov, Igor — 0-1 — ?
1950 — Watson, Charles vs Learner, A. — 0-1 — Melbourne AUS
1950 — Carretero de Jong, Raul vs Schijf, A. — 0-1 — cr.
1950 — Martin Martinez, Pedro Jose vs De Freitas, Manuela Schmitz — 1-0 — Mar del Plata ARG
1950 — Muhring, Willem Jan vs Puc, Stojan — 1/2-1/2 — ?
5…c5 — 3.5% (45 parties)
1958 — Keller, Albrecht vs Gereben, Erno — 0-1 — Lugano SUI
1960 — Pomar Salamanca, Arturo vs Gligoric, Sofija — 1/2-1/2 — Madrid zt
1962 — Gregory Juma Mwangi vs Griffiths, Peter C — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1969 — Wiedemann, Franz vs Schulze, Ulrich — 1/2-1/2 — Hamburg GER
1970 — Rapaka Samuel Paul vs Gligoric, Svetozar — 1/2-1/2 — ?
5…Nbd7 — 2.4% (31 parties)
1951 — Heemsoth, Hermann vs Friedrich, Gerd — 1-0 — ?
1951 — Guimaraes, Sergio Murilo Soares vs Belem, Luciano — 0-1 — Fortaleza BRA
1952 — Zalys, Ignas vs Marquez Osorio Pedro Leon — 1-0 — Tampa US op
1953 — Winkler, Erich vs Quecke, Kurt — 1/2-1/2 — Jena GER
1961 — Benitez, Otto vs Etcheverry, Eduardo — 0-1 — Uruguay
5…e5 — 1.4% (18 parties)
1951 — Koberl, Ferenc vs Szabo, Laszlo — 0-1 — Budapest HUN
1952 — Donner, Jan-Hein vs Bosch van Rosenthal, Edzard — 0-1 — Enschede ch-NLD
1952 — Aleman Munoz Jorge Luis vs Rossolimo, Nicolas — 0-1 — Havana CUB
1952 — Cruz Filho, Oswaldo vs Bolbochan, Julio — 0-1 — Rio de Janeiro BRA
1952 — Gay, Antonio vs Fiore, Ignazio — 1-0 — Ferrara ITA

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger