Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● f2→g3, h2→g3 | ● c7→d6, e7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | ● e4 (2v1), ● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (3v1) | ● g4 (2v0), ● f5 (2v0) |
| Cases faibles | — | — |
| Centre | ● d4 (1v0), ● d5 (3v1), ● e4 (2v1) | — |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bg2 | ● Bg2 Actif (mob. 7) | |
| Bg7 | ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2) | |
| Bc8 | ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 4 (● g1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1) | 4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Au centre | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | O-O / O-O-O | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | ● c4-c5 | ● …c7-c5, ● …d6-d5, ● …e7-e5 |
E61f — King’s Indian: 4.g3 d6 5.Bg2
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.g3 d6 5.Bg2 * ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. Nf3 (Développer g1 — 75 % des parties) ; e4 (Occuper le centre — 12 % des parties) ; e3 (Solidifier le centre — 10 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 87 % des parties) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 6 % des parties) ; ...Nbd7 (Développer b8 — 6 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1942 Moscow Ch – Round 1 – Zagoriansky, Evgeny – 1-0 – Duz-Khotimirsky, Fedor Ivanovich – G21 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6. e4 e5 7. Nge2 O-O 8. O-O Re8 9. d5 a5 10. f3 Nc5 |
| 1947 GBR Ch 34th – Round 8 – Newman, Richard Hilary – 1/2-1/2 – Thomas, George Alan – G36 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. Nc3 c6 6. e4 Nbd7 7. Nge2 e5 8. d5 c5 9. O-O Nb6 10. Qd3 Nh5 |
| 1952 Hagen – Round 5 – Jaeger, Walter – 1-0 – Lehmann, Heinz – G7 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. d4 Bg7 4. g3 d6 5. Bg2 e5 6. dxe5 dxe5 7. Qxd8+ Kxd8 8. Bg5 h6 9. O-O-O+ Nd7 10. Bxf6+ Bxf6 |
| 1952 Helsinki olm – Round 1 – Golombek, Harry – 1-0 – Lorson, Gerhard – G108 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6. e3 O-O 7. Nge2 e5 8. O-O c6 9. b3 Qe7 10. Qc2 Ne8 |
| 1952 Helsinki olm – Round 1 – Golombek, Harry – 1/2-1/2 – Aleman Dovo, Miguel – G102 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 d6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6. e3 O-O 7. Nge2 e5 8. O-O Re8 9. Qc2 Nf8 10. b3 c6 |
| 1953 AUS Ch – Round 6 – Reintals, Karlis – 0-1 – Crowl, Frank Arthur – G7 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. d4 e5 6. dxe5 dxe5 7. Qxd8+ Kxd8 8. Bg5 c6 9. Ne4 Ke7 10. Nf3 h6 |
| 1965 Yerevan – Round 1 – Filip, Marius Liviu – 1/2-1/2 – Schmid, Leo – G1 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d6 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. d4 e5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. d5 Ne7 8. O-O Nd7 9. e4 O-O 10. Be3 h6 |
Gukesh D — 1 partie
1950 — Herseth, Storm vs Nielsen, Palle — 1/2-1/2 — Reykjavik ISL
1950 — Eken, Max vs Barda, Olaf — 1/2-1/2 — Nederland radio
1950 — Schmid, Leo vs Pedersen, Ebbe — 1-0 — Dubrovnik olm
1951 — Piro Adam vs Garibaldi, Alberto Flavio — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1955 — Collins, John W vs Bernstein, Alexander — 1-0 — ?
1956 — Rebold vs Flohr, E Scott — 0-1 — San Quentin, CA
1964 — Lehmann, Heinz vs Garcia Tore, Francisco — 1-0 — Malaga ESP
1970 — Beil, Zdenek vs Valek, Frantisek — 1-0 — Harrachov
1951 — Jaeger, Walter vs Gilg, Karl — 0-1 — Duesseldorf GER
1951 — Eken, Max vs Riehl, J. — 0-1 — The Hague simul
1951 — Kruger, Stefan vs Crowl, Frank Arthur — 1-0 — Melbourne AUS
1951 — Donner, Jan-Hein vs Di, Palma Alicia — 1-0 — Beverwijk NED
1960 — Letelier, Rene vs Flores , Nelson — 1/2-1/2 — Sao Paulo BRA
1987 — Cablitz, Hans-Joachim vs Muender, Michael — 1-0 — BL2-N8788 GER
1991 — Wessman, Richard vs Bologan, Victor — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1994 — Bruno, Paolo vs Vogel, Karlheinz, Dr. — 0-1 — corr CompuServe