Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	—
Passés	—	—
Majorité	● aile dame 3v2	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● b5 (3v0)	—
Cases faibles	—	● d5
Centre	● d5 (2v1)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● d	● c

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf1	● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	4 (● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1)	6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	● e2-e4, ● f2-f4	—

D32c — QGD Tarrasch: 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e5

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Nf3 (78 % des parties) ; Ndb5 (16 % des parties) ; Nc2 (6 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 6 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1903 It (Men) Monte Carlo MNC – Round 26 – Marchand, Max – 1/2-1/2 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G122 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Nf3 d4 7. Nd5 Nf6 8. Nxe5 Nxd5 9. cxd5 Qxd5 10. Nf3 Nc6
1905 Scheveningen – Round ? – Marshall, Frank – 1-0 – Oskam, Gerard – G32 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 a6 7. Qa4 Bd7 8. cxd5 Nf6 9. d6 axb5 10. Qxa8 b4
1906 DSB-15.Kongress – Round 13 – Fahrni, Hans – 0-1 – Vidmar, Milan Sr – G70 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 c5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Nf3 d4 7. Nd5 Nf6 8. e4 Nxe4 9. Nxe5 Nc6 10. Nd3 Be6
1909 St Petersburg – Round 1 – Bernstein, Ossip – 1-0 – Perlis, Julius – G8 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 a6 7. Qa4 Bd7 8. cxd5 Nc6 9. dxc6 Bxc6 10. Qb3 axb5
1911 Karlsbad – Round 13 – Rotlewi, Georg – 1-0 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G266 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 c5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 d4 7. Nd5 Na6 8. Qa4 Bd7 9. g3 Bc6 10. Bg2 Ne7
1911 San Sebastian – Round 11 – Bernstein, Olivia – 0-1 – Leonhardt, Paul – G65 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 d4 7. Nd5 Na6 8. e3 Nf6 9. Nxf6+ Qxf6 10. exd4 Bb4+
1913 Scheveningen – Round ? – Lasker, Edward – 1-0 – D.Yates, F – G36 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 c5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 d4 7. Nd5 Na6 8. e4 Bd7 9. Qh5 Qb8 10. c5 Bxc5
1913 Scheveningen – Round ? – Lasker, Edward – 1-0 – Yates, Frederic D – G37 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 c5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 d4 7. Nd5 Na6 8. e4 Bd7 9. Qh5 Qb8 10. c5 Bxc5
1945 USSR ch sf – Round 10 – Chistiakov, Alexander – 0-1 – Bronstein, David I – G15 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Nf3 d4 7. Nd5 Nc6 8. e4 Nf6 9. Bg5 Be7 10. Bxf6 Bxf6
1950 Moscow Ch – Round ? – Chistiakov, Alexander – 1-0 – Ravinsky, Grigory – G29 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Nf3 d4 7. Nd5 Nc6 8. e3 Nf6 9. Nxf6+ Qxf6 10. Be2 Bb4+
1961 URS-ch29 sf Novgorod – Round 14 – Veresov, Gavriil – 1-0 – Hasidovski, Arnold – G20 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 e5 6. Ndb5 a6 7. Qa4 Bd7 8. cxd5 Bc5 9. e3 Nf6 10. Qc4 Qc8

D32c — QGD Tarrasch (1903)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e5

Les coups candidats

6.Nf3 — 70.6% (161 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Hauer, F. (2x), Stoicea, Marius-Gabriel (2x), Diskin, Semen (2x), Sliwa, Bogdan (1x), Fronczek, Heinrich (1x), Chistiakov, Alexander (1x), Ravinsky, Grigory (1x), Werner, Clemens (1x)

6.Ndb5 — 18.9% (43 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Veresov, Gavriil (1x), Hasidovski, Arnold (1x), Kieffer, Joachim (1x), Emde, Rainer (1x), Becker, Hartmut (1x), Shkurovich, Khasin Boris (1x), Hoffmann, Michael (1x), Todorovic, Goran M (1x)

6.Nc2 — 9.6% (22 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Fridman, Daniel (2x), Vacca, Georges (1x), Thiellement, Andre (1x), Pirotzky, Mario (1x), Hase, Juan Carlos (1x), Winter, Justus (1x), Schaefer, Alexander (1x), Dobrotka, Martin (1x)

6.Nb3 — 0.9% (2 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Saiti, Eldit (1x), Seitaj, Ilir (1x), Savran, Deniz (1x), Torun, Selin (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	6.Nf3	6.Ndb5	6.Nc2	6.Nb3
<1800	19	74%	5%	16%	5%
1800-2200	117	73%	17%	10%	—
2200-2600	42	64%	29%	5%	2%
2600+	1	—	100%	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	6.Nf3	6.Ndb5	6.Nc2	6.Nb3
1950s	1	100%	—	—	—
1960s	2	50%	50%	—	—
1970s	6	50%	17%	33%	—
1980s	6	83%	17%	—	—
1990s	60	80%	12%	8%	—
2000s	66	74%	18%	8%	—
2010s	55	67%	20%	13%	—
2020s	32	53%	31%	9%	6%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
6.Nf3	67%	53%	▼ -14.1%
6.Ndb5	20%	31%	▲ +11.2%
6.Nc2	13%	9%	▼ -3.4%
6.Nb3	0%	6%	▲ +6.2%

Parties historiques

6.Nf3 — 70.6% (161 parties)

1950 — Chistiakov, Alexander vs Ravinsky, Grigory — 1-0 — Moscow RUS
1963 — Sliwa, Bogdan vs Fronczek, Heinrich — 1-0 — Glucholazy ch POL
1971 — Ljubisavljevic, Zivojin Z vs Wagman, Stuart — 1-0 — La Spezia
1974 — Matsula, V. vs Survila, Rimvydas — 1/2-1/2 — Vilnius LTU
1978 — Mayer, Stepanka vs Van der Giessen, Ada Leona — 1-0 — Bydgoszcz POL

6.Ndb5 — 18.9% (43 parties)

1961 — Veresov, Gavriil vs Hasidovski, Arnold — 1-0 — Novgorod RUS
1979 — Becker, Hartmut vs Shkurovich, Khasin Boris — 0-1 — ?
1988 — Kieffer, Joachim vs Emde, Rainer — 1/2-1/2 — Nuerenberg GER
1991 — Hoffmann, Michael vs Todorovic, Goran M — 1-0 — Biel SUI
1992 — Saarman, Sven vs Turppo, Esko — 1-0 — corr SF

6.Nc2 — 9.6% (22 parties)

1972 — Pirotzky, Mario vs Hase, Juan Carlos — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ch-ARG
1975 — Vacca, Georges vs Thiellement, Andre — 0-1 — Dijon FRA
1997 — Winter, Justus vs Schaefer, Alexander — 0-1 — GER
1997 — Dobrotka, Martin vs Theissl Pokorna, Regina — 1-0 — Prievidza
1997 — Hahn, Winfried, Prof. Dr. vs Diczi, Marion — 1-0 — Passau

6.Nb3 — 0.9% (2 parties)

2025 — Saiti, Eldit vs Seitaj, Ilir — 0-1 — Prishtina KOS
2026 — Savran, Deniz vs Torun, Selin — 0-1 — Lichess