D14m — Slav: Exchange, 8.Bd3 Main Line, 12.Rfc1

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bf4 Bf5 7.e3 e6 8.Bd3 Bxd3 9.Qxd3 Bd6 10.Bxd6 Qxd6 11.O-O O-O 12.Rfc1 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur la case forte b5.

Plans. Tour sur colonne c.

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur la case forte b4 et un avant-poste en e4.

Plans. ...e5 (Rupture) ; Tour sur colonne c.

Avantages

Faiblesses adverses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● f2→e3, e3→d4	● e6→d5, f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● b5 (2v0)	● b4 (2v0)
Cases faibles	● e4	● e5
Centre	● d4 (3v1)	● d5 (3v1)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Ouvertes	● c	● c

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Paire de fous	Non	Non
Non développées	1 (a1)	1 (a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Roqué	● Roqué
Droits de roque	—	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● e3-e4	● …e6-e5

Partie
1950 Amsterdam – Round 1 – Kottnauer, Cenek – 1/2-1/2 – Rossolimo, Nicolas – G7 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. O-O O-O
1959 Tbilisi ch-URS – Round 15 – Gufeld, Eduard – 1/2-1/2 – Krogius, Nikolai V – G121 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. cxd5 cxd5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1962 Lasker Memorial – Round 14 – Doda, Zbigniew – 1/2-1/2 – Minev, Nikolay N – G25 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. cxd5 cxd5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1964 Rubinstein Memorial – Round 6 – Schmidt, Waldemar – 1/2-1/2 – Doda, Zbigniew – G23 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Bf4 Nc6 6. Nc3 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1967 FRG Ch Kiel GER – Round 10 – Eising, Johannes – 1/2-1/2 – Besser, Hans – G38 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. cxd5 cxd5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1967 October Revolution 50 – Round ? – Barcza, Gedeon – 1/2-1/2 – Kholmov, Ratmir D – G13 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. d4 d5 3. c4 c6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1968 Kecskemet – Round 1 – Navarovszky, Laszlo – 1/2-1/2 – Popov, Lazar – G3 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
1969 Rubinstein Memorial – Round 12 – Popov, Luben – 1/2-1/2 – Ivkov, Borislav – G53 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. cxd5 cxd5 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6
World Blitz 2018 – Round 21.11 – Jakovenko, Dmitry – 1/2-1/2 – Dreev, Aleksey – G1211 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 3. c4 c6 4. cxd5 cxd5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bf5 7. e3 e6 8. Bd3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Bd6 10. Bxd6 Qxd6

D14m — Exchange Main Line

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bf4 Bf5 7.e3 e6 8.Bd3 Bxd3 9.Qxd3 Bd6 10.Bxd6 Qxd6 11.O-O O-O 12.Rfc1

Eval: [-0.07]

Les coups candidats

12…Rfc8 — 79.0% (603 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Xu, Xiangyu (8x), Kaposztas, Miklos (7x), Csom, Istvan (6x), Rashkovsky, Nukhim N (6x), Stremavicius, Titas (6x), Zhao, Shengxin (6x), Gufeld, Eduard (5x), Foisor, Ovidiu-Doru (5x)

12…Rac8 — 15.9% (121 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Boensch, Uwe (5x), Minev, Nikolay N (3x), Popov, Luben (3x), Knezevic, Milorad (3x), Panchenko, Alexandar G (3x), Gufeld, Eduard (2x), Doda, Zbigniew (2x), Popov, Lazar (2x)

12…a6 — 1.8% (14 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Terbe, Julianna (2x), Terbe, Zsuzsanna (2x), Blanche, Paul (1x), Robin, Samy (1x), Drazic, Sinisa (1x), Fontaine, Raphael (1x), Stukopin, Andrey (1x), Belous, Vladimir (1x)

12…Rfe8 — 0.8% (6 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Nacu, Miron (1x), Gheorghiu, Florin (1x), Kantsler, Boris (1x), Velikov, Petar (1x), Blatny, Pavel (1x), Meduna, Eduard (1x), Savon, Vladimir (1x), Rublevsky, Sergei (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	12…Rfc8	12…Rac8	12…a6	12…Rfe8
1800-2200	70	70%	16%	10%	—
2200-2600	611	80%	16%	1%	1%
2600+	40	88%	10%	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	12…Rfc8	12…Rac8	12…a6	12…Rfe8
1930s	1	100%	—	—	—
1950s	4	25%	50%	—	—
1960s	29	66%	28%	—	3%
1970s	32	81%	19%	—	—
1980s	72	83%	12%	—	3%
1990s	60	68%	20%	2%	3%
2000s	94	73%	18%	5%	—
2010s	370	81%	15%	2%	0%
2020s	101	87%	11%	2%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
12…Rfc8	81%	87%	▲ +6.6%
12…Rac8	15%	11%	▼ -4.2%
12…a6	2%	2%	+0.4%
12…Rfe8	0%	0%	-0.3%

Parties historiques

12…Rfc8 — 79.0% (603 parties)

1934 — Chekhover, Vitaly vs Veresov, Gavriil — 1-0 — Leningrad ch-URS
1959 — Nikolaevsky, Yuri V vs Stein, Leonid — 1/2-1/2 — Kiev UKR
1960 — Padevsky, Nikola vs Minev, Nikolay N — 1/2-1/2 — Varna Varna BUL
1960 — Nikolaevsky, Yuri V vs Gufeld, Eduard — 1/2-1/2 — Kiev UKR
1961 — Simagin, Vladimir vs Dely, Peter — 1/2-1/2 — Maroczy mem Budapest HUN

12…Rac8 — 15.9% (121 parties)

1952 — Grynfeld, Izaak vs Hooper, David — 1/2-1/2 — Helsinki olm
1959 — Gufeld, Eduard vs Krogius, Nikolai V — 1/2-1/2 — Tbilisi ch-URS
1961 — Neikirkh, Oleg vs Minev, Nikolay N — 1/2-1/2 — Sofia BUL
1962 — Doda, Zbigniew vs Minev, Nikolay N — 1/2-1/2 — Berlin-Ost
1964 — Popov, Luben vs Minev, Nikolay N — 1/2-1/2 — Sofia BUL

12…a6 — 1.8% (14 parties)

1997 — Blanche, Paul vs Robin, Samy — 1/2-1/2 — Montlucon
2001 — Drazic, Sinisa vs Fontaine, Raphael — 1/2-1/2 — Subotica YUG
2008 — Soukup, Vaclav vs Burdik, Lubomir — 1/2-1/2 — Tatranske Zruby SVK
2009 — Stukopin, Andrey vs Belous, Vladimir — 1/2-1/2 — Kirishi RUS
2009 — Bacso, Gergely vs Lengyel, Bela — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN

12…Rfe8 — 0.8% (6 parties)

1965 — Nacu, Miron vs Gheorghiu, Florin — 1/2-1/2 — Bucharest ROU
1985 — Kantsler, Boris vs Velikov, Petar — 1/2-1/2 — Frunze KGZ
1989 — Blatny, Pavel vs Meduna, Eduard — 1/2-1/2 — CSR-ch int Prague CZE
1993 — Savon, Vladimir vs Rublevsky, Sergei — 1/2-1/2 — Kurgan
1994 — Foisor, Ovidiu-Doru vs Ghitescu, Theodor — 1/2-1/2 — CRO-chT2 Opatija