Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | ● d3, ● d5 | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● c2→d3 | — |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | — | — |
| Cases faibles | — | — |
| Centre | ● e4 (1v0), ● e5 (1v0) | ● d5 (1v0) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Semi-ouvertes | ● e | ● d |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 2) | |
| Bf1 | ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 1) | |
| Bc8 | ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bf8 | ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 6 (● b1, ● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) | 6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Au centre | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | O-O / O-O-O | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | tension | |
| Ruptures | ● d5-d6 | ● …c7-c6 |
C31h — KGD: Falkbeer, 4.d3
1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 e4 4.d3 * ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Tension centrale
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. dxe4 (Capture en e4, Occuper le centre — 61 % des parties) ; Nc3 (Développer b1 — 14 % des parties) ; Nd2 (Développer b1 — 8 % des parties) ; Qe2 (Pression sur colonne e, Prépare O-O-O — 8 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Nf6 (Développer g8 — 79 % des parties) ; ...Qxd5 (Centraliser la dame, Prépare O-O-O — 12 % des parties) ; ...exd3 (Capture en d3, Solidifier le centre — 7 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1900 Augsburg blindfold sim – Round ? – Pillsbury, Harry – 1/2-1/2 – Dyckhoff, Eduard – G10 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Qe2 Nf6 6. Nd2 Bf5 7. dxe4 Bxe4 8. Nxe4 Qxe4 9. Qxe4+ Nxe4 10. Bd3 Nf6 |
| 1902 Berlin blindfold simul – Round 4 – Pillsbury, Harry – 0-1 – Behnisch, Livia – G3 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Bxc3 7. Bxc3 Ne7 8. Bxg7 Rg8 9. Be5 Bg4 10. Qd2 Na6 |
| 1902 Monte Carlo – Round 15 – Napier, William – 0-1 – Marshall, Frank – G59 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 exd3 5. Bxd3 Qxd5 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. O-O Bc5+ 8. Kh1 Nc6 9. Nc3 Qh5 10. Qe1+ Nge7 |
| 1902 Moscow blindfold sim – Round 9 – Pillsbury, Harry – 1-0 – Urusov, F. – G9 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Bxc3 7. Bxc3 Nf6 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9. dxe4 Qxe4+ 10. Qe2 Qxe2+ |
| 1911 Cologne-A – Round 16 – Kirschen – 0-1 – Nyholm, Gustav – G14 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 exd3 5. Qxd3 Bc5 6. Be3 Qe7 7. Kf2 Nf6 8. h3 Bf5 9. Qb5+ c6 10. Bxc5 Ne4+ |
| 1911 San Sebastian – Round 12 – Leonhardt, Paul – 0-1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – G72 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 exd3 5. Qxd3 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bc5 7. Bd2 O-O 8. O-O-O Nbd7 9. Be2 Nb6 10. Bf3 Bg4 |
| 1914 Baden – Round 1 – Spielmann, Rudolf – 1/2-1/2 – Schlechter, Carl – G18 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Bxc3 7. Bxc3 Ne7 8. Qd2 O-O 9. dxe4 Qxe4+ 10. Ne2 Nbc6 |
| 1919 Stockholm – Round 4 – Reti, Richard – 1-0 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G24 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Qe2 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bb4 7. Bd2 Bxc3 8. Bxc3 Bg4 9. dxe4 Bxe2 10. exd5 Bxf1 |
| 1920 Gothenburg – Round 5 – Reti, Richard – 1-0 – Tarrasch, Siegbert – G28 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Qe2 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bb4 7. Bd2 Bxc3 8. Bxc3 Bg4 9. dxe4 Qxe4 10. Qxe4+ Nxe4 |
| 1922 London – Round 14 – Morrison James – 0-1 – Vidmar, Marjeta – G35 1. f4 e5 2. e4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 exd3 5. Bxd3 Qxd5 6. Nc3 Bb4 7. Qe2+ Qe6 8. Be3 Bxc3+ 9. bxc3 Nf6 10. Bc4 Qe7 |
| 1923 Simul Montreal (QUE) – Round ? – Alekhine, Alexander – 1/2-1/2 – Pelletier, Justinien – G7 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Bxc3 7. Bxc3 Ne7 8. dxe4 Qxe4+ 9. Qe2 Qxe2+ 10. Bxe2 O-O |
| 1936 Corr – Round 1 – Keres, Paul – 1-0 – Vidmar, Marjeta – G10 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 exd3 5. Bxd3 Qxd5 6. Nc3 Qe6+ 7. Nge2 Nf6 8. O-O Qb6+ 9. Kh1 Be7 10. Qe1 Nc6 |
| 1947 San Pablo blind sim – Round 18 – Najdorf, Miguel – 1/2-1/2 – Trouzeau, S – G15 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Qxd5 5. Qe2 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bb4 7. Bd2 Bxc3 8. Bxc3 Bf5 9. Bxf6 gxf6 10. g4 Bd7 |
| 1959 CAN Ch – Round 9 – Anderson, Frank Ross – 1-0 – Smolij, Josef – G17 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. d3 Bf5 5. Qe2 Qe7 6. d4 c6 7. dxc6 Nxc6 8. c3 Nf6 9. Be3 Qe6 10. Nd2 Be7 |
Fin du contenu
Aucune page supplémentaire à charger
1950 — Chikwenya Hastings vs Anderson, Frank Ross — 1-0 — Toronto CAN
1950 — Alexander Tadala vs Ravinsky, Grigory — 1-0 — Leningard
1951 — Santasiere, Anthony vs Bernstein, Sidney — 1/2-1/2 — New York ch-USA
1951 — Morris, Daniel vs Barker, W — 1-0 — ?
1953 — Abdou, William vs Akinwunmi Adebayo Richards — 1/2-1/2 — No. California
1959 — Freeman, Nigel vs Fallone, Michael — 1/2-1/2 — York ch-BCF
1962 — Cebbar, Derin vs Serra Olives, Tomas — 0-1 — ?
1968 — Shalnev, Nikolai vs Zypirev — 1-0 — ?
1957 — Farber, Evans vs Dick, Andreas — 0-1 — Hollywood, CA
1966 — Illi, Hans-Joerg vs Fridjonsson, Julius — 1-0 — WchTJ U26 fin-B
1970 — Mossong, Hubert vs Sigurjonsson, Bjorn — 0-1 — Groningen NED
1970 — Abderrahmane Ely vs Littlewood, John E — 0-1 — Coventry ch-BCF
1972 — Zalys, Ignas vs Coulombe, Serge — 1-0 — Quebec op Montreal
1988 — Freter, Anke vs Boldt, Monika — 1-0 — Landes-Einzelmeister
1995 — Boros, Daniel vs Dupsky, Laszlo — 1/2-1/2 — Korcsoportos donto
1996 — Schodelbauer, Jan vs Jindriskova, Dana — 1-0 — Klatovy CZE