Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● d4→e5	● e6→d5, f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v1)	—
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (1v0), ● e4 (2v1)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf1	● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1)	5 (● b8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	—	● …f7-f6

C11c — French: Steinitz, Gledhill Attack

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Qg4 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Nf3 (Développer g1 — 46 % des parties) ; Nb5 (19 % des parties) ; Bg5 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer c1 — 12 % des parties) ; Be3 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 8 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 81 % des parties) ; ...h6 (8 % des parties) ; ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 8 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1902 Moscow blindfold sim – Round 19 – Pillsbury, Harry – 1-0 – Aleksandrov, NA. – G18 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Bb5 a6 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. O-O cxd4 10. Nxd4 Nxe5
1905 Ostende – Round 14 – Leonhardt, Paul – 0-1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – G44 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Bb5 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Ndxe5 9. Qg3 a6 10. Nxc6 Nxc6
1907 Vienna – Round 2 – Martinolich, Giovanni Jr – 0-1 – Tartakower, Savielly – G11 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 h5 6. Qg3 h4 7. Qg4 c5 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. Nb5 Nc6 10. Bf4 a6
1912 Vilnius – Round 6 – Freiman, Andy – 1/2-1/2 – Alapin, Simon – G28 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Be3 cxd4 8. Bxd4 Nxd4 9. Nxd4 Nxe5 10. Qg3 Bd6
1914 DSB-19.Kongress Hauptturnier A – Round 3 – Bohatirchuk, Fedor – 0-1 – Studt, Bernhardt – G7 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 h5 7. Qg3 h4 8. Qf4 Be7 9. Be3 Nc6 10. dxc5 Nxc5
1923 Maehrisch Ostrau – Round 3 – Bogoljubow, Efim – 0-1 – Reti, Richard – G19 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nb5 cxd4 7. Nf3 Nc6 8. Nd6+ Bxd6 9. Qxg7 Bxe5 10. Nxe5 Qf6
1926 Lake Hopatcong – Round 1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – 0-1 – Maroczy, Geza – G4 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Bb5 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 a6 10. Bxd7+ Bxd7
1930 Hamburg ol – Round 6.2 – Desler, Arne – 0-1 – Prokes, Ladislav – G5 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Qg3 Nxd4 8. Nxd4 cxd4 9. Nb5 Qb6 10. c3 dxc3
1932 Trebitsch Memorial 15th – Round 4 – Becker, Albert – 1-0 – Glass, Eduard – G6 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Be3 cxd4 7. Bxd4 Nc6 8. O-O-O Nxd4 9. Rxd4 a6 10. Nf3 b5
1933 Ebensee – Round 4 – Eliskases, Erich – 1-0 – Demetriescu Th – G14 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Be3 Nc6 7. O-O-O cxd4 8. Bxd4 Nxd4 9. Rxd4 Nxe5 10. Qe2 Nc6
1935 Warsaw ol – Round 1 – Stoltz, Gösta – 0-1 – Nielsen, Bjorn – G7 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 a6 7. dxc5 Nc6 8. Qg3 Nxc5 9. Be3 Qa5 10. Bxc5 Qxc5
1937 Parnu – Round 2 – Raud, Ilmar – 1/2-1/2 – Stahlberg, Gideon – G7 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Be3 cxd4 7. Bxd4 Nc6 8. O-O-O a6 9. Nf3 g6 10. h4 Nxd4
1941 Buenos Aires Circulo – Round 8 – Czerniak, Moshe – 0-1 – Guimard, Carlos E – G30 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. dxc5 a6 8. Qg3 Nxc5 9. Be3 Qa5 10. Bxc5 Qxc5
1946 Hamburg HSV – Round 4 – Sahlmann, Walter – 0-1 – Heinicke, Herbert – G8 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. dxc5 Ncxe5 8. Qg3 Nc6 9. Be3 Qa5 0-1
1948 US Open – Round 2 – Bisguier, Arthur B – 0-1 – Stark, Martin Charles – G12 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. dxc5 a6 8. Be3 Ndxe5 9. Nxe5 Nxe5 10. Qg3 Nc6
1951 URS Ch sf Baku AZE – Round 18 – Estrin, Yakov – 1/2-1/2 – Lilienthal, Andor – G9 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Bb5 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Ndxe5 9. Qg3 a6 10. Bxc6+ Nxc6
1955 Manhattan CC Ch 5556 – Round 6 – Bisguier, Arthur B – 1/2-1/2 – Siegel, Markus – G27 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. dxc5 a6 8. Be3 Ncxe5 9. Nxe5 Nxe5 10. Qg3 Nc6
1963 URS Team Ch – Round 1 – Gurgenidze, Bukhuti – 1/2-1/2 – Petrosian, Tigran A. – G20 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Nf3 cxd4 7. Nb5 Nc6 8. Bf4 Qa5+ 9. Bd2 Qb6 10. Nd6+ Bxd6

C11c — Steinitz Variation, Gledhill Attack (1902)

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Qg4

Les coups candidats

5…c5 — 81.0% (222 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Vandivier, Don L (2x), Ayupov, Damir (2x), Ball, Laurence (2x), Uran Bermudez, Oliver Kevin (2x), Sharma, Dinesh K. (2x), Pena Riasco, Alexander (2x), Castillo Gallego, Sergio (2x), Rubery, Mark (2x)

5…f5 — 7.3% (20 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Dougherty, Paul J (1x), Meyer, Alfredo (1x), Fabian, Huba (1x), Seubert, Karl (1x), Nygren, David (1x), Andersson, Kjell-Ake (1x), Szilagyi, Zoltan (1x), Bodor, Tamas (1x)

5…h6 — 3.3% (9 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Lutes, John W (1x), Boza Quiros Santiago (1x), Nagy, Imre (1x), Dobcsanyi, David (1x), Andersen, Harry (1x), Livendahl, Kristian (1x), Zoch, Werner, Dr. (1x), Tenninger, Joerg (1x)

5…h5 — 2.6% (7 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Loerke, Reinhard (1x), Del Castillo Olivares Rei, Alfonso (1x), Diaz, Franc (1x), Alderson, John K A (1x), Watson, Colin (1x), Schack, Asbjorn Hovgaard (1x), Schowalter, Gerd (1x), Dickel, Gisbert (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	5…c5	5…f5	5…h6	5…h5
<1800	27	70%	11%	7%	—
1800-2200	146	78%	8%	3%	4%
2200-2600	46	98%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	5…c5	5…f5	5…h6	5…h5
1950s	2	100%	—	—	—
1960s	3	67%	—	33%	—
1970s	2	50%	50%	—	—
1980s	9	78%	—	—	—
1990s	30	90%	3%	7%	—
2000s	70	80%	9%	3%	1%
2010s	141	79%	9%	1%	4%
2020s	17	88%	—	12%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
5…c5	79%	88%	▲ +8.8%
5…f5	9%	0%	▼ -8.5%
5…h6	1%	12%	▲ +10.3%
5…h5	4%	0%	▼ -4.3%

Parties historiques

5…c5 — 81.0% (222 parties)

1951 — Estrin, Yakov vs Lilienthal, Andor — 1/2-1/2 — URS-ch sf Baku AZE
1955 — Bisguier, Arthur B vs Siegel, Markus — 1/2-1/2 — New York, NY USA
1963 — Gurgenidze, Bukhuti vs Petrosian, Tigran V. — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1966 — Vacca, Georges vs Derouineau, Paul — 1-0 — FRA-ch Grenoble FRA
1975 — Haubt, Georg vs Werner, Dimo — 1/2-1/2 — Stadtallendorf

5…f5 — 7.3% (20 parties)

1972 — Dougherty, Paul J vs Meyer, Alfredo — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1992 — Fabian, Huba vs Seubert, Karl — 0-1 — Bad Woerishofen GER
2000 — Szilagyi, Zoltan vs Bodor, Tamas — 0-1 — HUN
2003 — Nygren, David vs Andersson, Kjell-Ake — 1-0 — Stockholm SWE
2003 — Collazo Hidalgo-Gato, Niala vs Pazos Porta, Antonio — 0-1 — Ortiguera

5…h6 — 3.3% (9 parties)

1966 — Lutes, John W vs Boza Quiros Santiago — 1-0 — Columbus, OH USA
1995 — Andersen, Harry vs Livendahl, Kristian — 1-0 — Fredrikstad
1996 — Nagy, Imre vs Dobcsanyi, David — 1-0 — HUN
2001 — Zoch, Werner, Dr. vs Tenninger, Joerg — 1-0 — Isernhagen
2003 — Masegosa Masegosa, David vs Garcia Gil, Jesus — 0-1 — Alicante ESP

5…h5 — 2.6% (7 parties)

2004 — Loerke, Reinhard vs Del Castillo Olivares Rei, Alfonso — 1-0 — Calvia, Mallorca ESP
2016 — Wan, Yunguo vs Chen, Jonathan — 1-0 — Harbin CHN
2017 — Watson, Colin vs Schack, Asbjorn Hovgaard — 0-1 — Skorping
2017 — Schowalter, Gerd vs Dickel, Gisbert — 1/2-1/2 — Neustadt an der Weinstrasse
2017 — Bier, Klaus vs Wilk, Jan — 1/2-1/2 — Wolfstein

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →