Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● a2→b3, f2→g3, h2→g3, b3→c4 ● d6→e5, b7→c6, f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● g5 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (2v1), ● d5 (3v2)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 7)
Bg2 ● Bg2 Ok (mob. 2)
Bg7 ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 2 (● c1, ● a1) 2 (● c8, ● a8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Roqué ● Roqué
Droits de roque
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre fermé
Ruptures ● c4-c5, ● d4-d5 ● …c6-c5, ● …d6-d5

E68l — King’s Indian: Fianchetto, Classical, 8.e4 c6 9.b3

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.Nf3 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 Nbd7 7.O-O e5 8.e4 c6 9.b3 *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bRPièce non développée
bBPièce non développée
bQ
bR
bK
bP
bP
bN
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bN
bP
bP
Case forte (2v0)
wP
wPPion central
wPPion central
wP
wN
wN
wP
wP
wP
wB
wP
wRPièce non développée
wBPièce non développée
wQ
wR
wK
abcdefgh
Plan principal. Jeu au centre (rupture c4-c5).

Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de g5.

Côté adverse. Un mauvais fou en c8.

En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c1 et la tour a1).

Plans. h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 34 % des parties) ; Bb2 (Fianchetto, fou sur la grande diagonale — 14 % des parties) ; Re1 (6 % des parties) ; d5 (Occuper le centre — 6 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wK
wR
wQ
wBPièce non développée
wRPièce non développée
wP
wB
wP
wP
wP
wN
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
bP
bP
bN
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bN
bP
bP
bK
bR
bQ
bBPièce non développée
bRPièce non développée
hgfedcba
Plan principal. Jeu au centre (rupture c6-c5).

En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c8 et la tour a8).

Plans. ...Re8 (46 % des parties) ; ...exd4 (Capture en d4, Occuper le centre — 30 % des parties) ; ...Qb6 (Contrôle diagonale b6-g1 — 11 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1943 Mar del Plata – Round 1 – Bolbochan, J. – 1/2-1/2 – Czerniak, Magdalena – G4
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 Qc7
1943 Mar del Plata – Round 2 – Bolbochan, Jacobo – 1/2-1/2 – Czerniak, Moshe – G20
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 Qc7
1945 Moscow Ch – Round 10 – Fridstein, German – 1-0 – Alatortsev, Vladimir N. – G52
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nf3 Nbd7 4. Nc3 e5 5. g3 g6 6. Bg2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 Qa5
1945 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – 1-0 – Bondarevsky, Igor – G34
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nc3 e5 4. Nf3 Nbd7 5. g3 g6 6. Bg2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Re8
1946 ENG-URS radio – Round 2 – De Winter Gallegos, Willy – 0-1 – Bronstein, David I – G11
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nc3 Nbd7 4. Nf3 e5 5. g3 g6 6. Bg2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Re8
1946 Helsinki Helsinki FIN – Round 9 – Ragozin, Viacheslav – 1-0 – Solin, Ilmari – G18
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. g3 Nbd7 7. Bg2 e5 8. O-O c6 9. b3 Qa5 10. Bb2 Re8
1946 JUG Ch – Round 10 – Tekavcic, Ivo – 1/2-1/2 – Rabar, Braslav – G30
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nc3 Nbd7 4. g3 e5 5. Nf3 g6 6. Bg2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Re8
1946 Staunton, Groningen NED – Round 8 – Denker, Arnold S – 0-1 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – G28
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Nc3 O-O 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1948 GER Ch – Round 4 – Czaya, Richard – 1-0 – Rautenberg, Wilhelm – G8
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. d4 O-O 6. Nc3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1948 Saltsjobaden tt – Round 1 – Salo, Toivo – 0-1 – Ekenberg, Bengt – G6
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nf3 Nbd7 4. g3 e5 5. Bg2 g6 6. O-O Bg7 7. Nc3 O-O 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Qe7 10. Bb2 Rd8
1949 Beverwijk NED – Round ? – O'Kelly de Galway, Alberic – 0-1 – Henneberke, Frans – G7
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. g3 Nbd7 7. Bg2 e5 8. O-O c6 9. b3 Ne8 10. dxe5 Nxe5
1949 Hastings4950 – Round 4 – Euwe, Max – 1-0 – Fuller, Jack – G16
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Re8
1950 Amsterdam ch-NED – Round 1 – Euwe, Max – 1-0 – Van Scheltinga, Theo – G17
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1950 Candidats Tournament – Round 9 – Ståhlberg, Gideon – 1/2-1/2 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – G35
1. c4 Nf6 2. d4 d6 3. Nf3 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1955 Hoechst ch-GER – Round 1 – Hoenlinger, Baldur – 1/2-1/2 – Schwarz, Wolfgang – G64
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d6 5. d4 O-O 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1958 Argentina – Round 17 – Garcia Vera, Romeo – 0-1 – Eliskases, Erich – G132
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. O-O O-O 5. c4 d6 6. Nc3 e5 7. d4 Nbd7 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1958 UKR Ch – Round 12 – Ousatchi, Mark – 0-1 – Kots, Yuri I – G53
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. d4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 a5 10. Ba3 exd4
1960 Olympiad prel I – Round 2 – Bergraser, Volf – 1-0 – Czerniak, Moshe – G8
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 c6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O d6 7. Nc3 Nbd7 8. e4 e5 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 a6
1962 Mar del Plata KIM – Round 7 – Panno, Oscar – 1/2-1/2 – Cruz, Raul C. – G17
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. d4 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1963 Amsterdam m1 – Round 1 – Donner, Jan-Hein – 1-0 – Cuijpers, Frans Andre – G1
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc5
1966 La Habana olm prel – Round ? – Naranja, Renato – 0-1 – Alvarez del Monte, Jose – G300
1. c4 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. d4 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. Nc3 Nbd7 7. O-O c6 8. e4 e5 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1966 Rio Hondo zt – Round 16 – Mecking, Henrique – 1-0 – Rubinetti, Jorge – G94
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 O-O 5. g3 d6 6. Bg2 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Re8 10. Bb2 exd4
1966 US Open – Round 7 – Zemgalis, Elmars – 0-1 – Saidy, Anthony – G43
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 exd4 10. Nxd4 Re8
36. Olympiad 2004 – Round 12 – Bologan, Victor – 1/2-1/2 – Kotronias, Vasilios – G422
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3 O-O 5. Bg2 d6 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Qb6 10. Bb2 exd4
36. Olympiad 2004 – Round 5 – Navara, David – 1-0 – Kotronias, Vasilios – G158
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. g3 d6 6. Bg2 Nbd7 7. O-O e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 Qb6 10. Bb2 exd4
FIDE World Cup 2017 – Round 1.5 – Nguyen, Ngoc Truong Son – 0-1 – Adhiban, B. – G176
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. d4 g6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 e5 8. e4 c6 9. b3 a6 10. dxe5 dxe5

E68l — Fianchetto, Classical (1943)
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.Nf3 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 Nbd7 7.O-O e5 8.e4 c6 9.b3
Les coups candidats
9…Re8 — 46.1% (799 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Stohl, Igor (11x), Pigusov, Evgeny (8x), Krallmann, Matthias (7x), Vukic, Milan (6x), Baburin, Alexander (5x), Portisch, Ferenc (4x), Szekely, Peter (4x), Terekhov, Andrey (4x)
9…exd4 — 30.2% (523 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Stohl, Igor (11x), Ilincic, Zlatko (6x), Kurajica, Bojan (5x), Bagaturov, Giorgi (5x), Gruen, Gerd-Peter (4x), Badea, Bela (4x), Pigusov, Evgeny (4x), Akopian, Vladimir (4x)
9…Qb6 — 10.9% (189 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Kotronias, Vasilios (18x), Tukmakov, Vladimir B (3x), Guevara Pijoan, Josep (3x), Deforel, Jorge Eduardo (3x), Autenrieth, Michael, Dr. (2x), Kruppa, Yuri (2x), Lesiege, Alexandre (2x), Relange, Eloi (2x)
9…a6 — 3.6% (63 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Har-Zvi, Ronen (3x), Loginov, Valery A (3x), Iuldachev, Saidali (3x), Hendriks, Willy (3x), Baburin, Alexander (2x), Vadasz, Laszlo (2x), Wojtkiewicz, Aleksander (2x), Tregubov, Pavel V. (2x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 9…Re8 9…exd4 9…Qb6 9…a6
<1800 52 48% 23% 6% 6%
1800-2200 481 53% 23% 12% 1%
2200-2600 1003 43% 34% 11% 5%
2600+ 28 25% 29% 36% 11%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 9…Re8 9…exd4 9…Qb6 9…a6
1950s 17 41% 35%
1960s 14 64% 29%
1970s 24 33% 50% 8%
1980s 138 53% 36% 6% 1%
1990s 570 44% 36% 8% 3%
2000s 436 47% 26% 12% 5%
2010s 472 46% 25% 15% 4%
2020s 62 42% 24% 16% 3%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
9…Re8 46% 42% ▼ -4.3%
9…exd4 25% 24% ▼ -1.2%
9…Qb6 15% 16% ▲ +0.9%
9…a6 4% 3% ▼ -0.8%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Kasparov, Garry — 6 parties
Gukesh D — 1 partie
Parties historiques
9…Re8 — 46.1% (799 parties)
1950 — Eugenio, Sarah De Oliveira vs Stalda, Giuseppe — 1/2-1/2 — Venice ITA
1953 — Shamaev, Leonid vs Kasparian, Genrikh — 1-0 — Rostov on Don
1954 — Kara, Neman vs Bruce, Rowena M — 0-1 — Nottingham ch-BCF
1956 — Thibaut, Georges vs Restrepo, Guillermo — 1-0 — ?
1958 — Garcia Vera, Romeo vs Eliskases, Erich — 0-1 — Argentina
9…exd4 — 30.2% (523 parties)
1950 — Eken, Max vs Bosch van Rosenthal, Edzard — 1-0 — Amsterdam ch-NED
1950 — GIDEON SUNDAY vs Boleslavsky, Isaac — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN
1950 — GIDEON SUNDAY vs Boleslavsky, Isaac — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN
1952 — Kunitz, R. vs Sadlowski, Lukasz — 0-1 — corr USA
1953 — Herbin, J vs Reichel, Ewald — 0-1 — Copenhagen DEN
9…Qb6 — 10.9% (189 parties)
1976 — Petran, Pal vs Hazai, Laszlo Dr. — 1/2-1/2 — Hungary ch
1977 — Tukmakov, Vladimir B vs Kochyev, Alexander — 1-0 — Baku AZE
1981 — Mochalov, Evgeny V vs Vetemaa, Juri — 1/2-1/2 — Minsk BLR
1984 — Gudmundsson, Elvar vs Angantysson, Haukur — 0-1 — Grindavik
1985 — Autenrieth, Michael, Dr. vs Seibold, Hubert, Dr. — 0-1 — Zirndorf
9…a6 — 3.6% (63 parties)
1986 — Hjartarson, Johann vs Strauss, David — 1-0 — London ENG
1987 — McNab, Colin A vs Buchanan, Walter F. — 1-0 — Hamilton
1991 — Davies, Nigel R vs Markzon, Gregory — 0-1 — New York open
1992 — Schlosser, Philipp vs Mainka, Romuald — 1/2-1/2 — Munchen open
1992 — Vadasz, Laszlo vs Loginov, Vladimir — 1/2-1/2 — Kecskemet HUN

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger