E26d — Nimzo-Indian: Saemisch, 5…c5 6.e3 Qa5
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 Qa5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. Bd2 (Développer c1 — 66 % des parties) ; Qc2 (Prépare O-O-O — 24 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Ne4 (Cavalier centralisé en e4 — 39 % des parties) ; ...d6 (Libérer Bc8 — 16 % des parties) ; ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 16 % des parties) ; ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 14 % des parties) ; ...b6 (Préparer le fianchetto — 7 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | ● c3, ● c4 | — |
| Pions isolés | ● a3 | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● f2→e3, c3→d4, e3→d4 | ● d7→e6, f7→e6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | — | — |
| Cases faibles | — | — |
| Centre | ● d4 (3v1), ● e5 (1v0) | ● d5 (2v1), ● e4 (1v0) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Semi-ouvertes | ● b | — |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 2) | |
| Bf1 | ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 2) | |
| Bc8 | ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | Non |
| Clouages | ● pawn c3 | — |
| Non développées | 5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) | 4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Au centre | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | O-O / O-O-O | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | ● d4-d5 | ● …d7-d5, ● …e6-e5 |
| Partie |
|---|
| 1939 Leningrad ch-URS – Round 2 – Kotov Lundqvist, Alex – 1-0 – Lisitsin, Georgy – G11 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qa5 7. Qc2 d6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Ba4 10. Qb2 Nbd7 |
| 1940 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Rudakovsky, Iosif – 1/2-1/2 – Kotov Lundqvist, Alex – G29 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. f4 cxd4 |
| 1940 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Stolberg, Mark Moiseevich – 0-1 – Lisitsin, Georgy – G32 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. f4 Nc6 |
| 1947 JUG Ch – Round 6 – Gligorić, Svetozar – 1-0 – Radojcic, Miroslav – G14 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qa5 7. Qc2 d6 8. Bd3 Bd7 9. Ne2 Ba4 10. Qa2 e5 |
| 1949 Remedios de Escalada – Round 4 – Benko, Francisco – 0-1 – Bolbochan, Julio – G12 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qa5 7. Qc2 d5 8. cxd5 exd5 9. Bd2 Ne4 10. Bd3 Nxd2 |
| 1950 Candidats Playoff 1pl – Round 5 – Bronstein, David I – 1/2-1/2 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – G4 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Nf3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 O-O 10. Bd3 d6 |
| 1950 Corr Wch1 – Round 1 – Van't Veer, P. – 0-1 – Barda, Olaf – G7 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 d6 8. f3 Qc7 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. Ne2 b6 |
| 1950 Mar del Plata – Round 13 – Sanguinetti, Ricardo – 1/2-1/2 – Marini, Liam – G107 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. Nf3 Nc6 |
| 1950 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Borisenko, Georgy K – 1-0 – Sokolsky, Alexey – G35 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. f4 Nc6 |
| 1951 Mar del Plata zt – Round 22 – Bianco Esposito, Antonio – 1-0 – De Souza Mendes, Joao – G222 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 Nc6 10. f4 O-O |
| 1951 YUG Ch 6th – Round 6 – Udovcic, Mijo – 0-1 – Puc, Stojan – G30 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 O-O 8. Bd3 d6 9. f4 e5 10. fxe5 dxe5 |
| 1952 Buenos Aires – Round 6 – Huguet, Horacio E – 1-0 – Luckis, Marcos – G39 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 Nc6 10. f4 d6 |
| 1954 Gorki ch22-SU sf – Round 12 – Vladimirov, Boris T – 0-1 – Simagin, Vladimir – G33 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 Nc6 10. Nf3 cxd4 |
| 1961 Baku ch-URS – Round 10 – Vladimirov, Boris T – 1/2-1/2 – Bronstein, David I – G97 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. Nf3 Nd7 |
| 1962 New York m – Round 8 – Lombardy, William J – 0-1 – Evans, Larry M – G8 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. exd4 O-O 9. Bd2 Ne4 10. Ng3 Nxd2 |
| 1965 It II – Round 2 – Piket, Joop – 1-0 – Kramer, Haije – G2 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 Nc6 10. Nf3 d6 |
| FIDE Candidates 2013 – Round 11.1 – Svidler, Peter – 1-0 – Aronian, Levon – G40 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3+ 5. bxc3 c5 6. e3 Qa5 7. Bd2 Ne4 8. Bd3 Nxd2 9. Qxd2 d6 10. f4 Nd7 |
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1939 Leningrad ch-URS – Round 2 – Kotov Lundqvist, Alex – 1-0 – Lisitsin, Georgy – G11
- Lire la suite
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1940 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Rudakovsky, Iosif – 1/2-1/2 – Kotov Lundqvist, Alex – G29
- Lire la suite
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1940 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Stolberg, Mark Moiseevich – 0-1 – Lisitsin, Georgy – G32
- Lire la suite
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1949 Remedios de Escalada – Round 4 – Benko, Francisco – 0-1 – Bolbochan, Julio – G12
- Lire la suite
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1950 Candidats Playoff 1pl – Round 5 – Bronstein, David I – 1/2-1/2 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – G4
- Lire la suite
-
- E20-E59 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 Nimzo-Indian defence, E26 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 c5 6.e3 - Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, E26d - 6…Qa5 - Saemisch (1939), SÉRIE E
1951 Mar del Plata zt – Round 22 – Bianco Esposito, Antonio – 1-0 – De Souza Mendes, Joao – G222
- Lire la suite













1950 — Van't Veer, P. vs Barda, Olaf — 0-1 — corr Wch1
1950 — Bronstein, David I vs Boleslavsky, Isaac — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1950 — Sanguinetti, Renato vs Acoltzi Ruiz, Mariana — 1/2-1/2 — Mar del Plata ARG
1951 — Esposito, Alfredo vs De Souza Mendes, Joao — 1-0 — Mar del Plata ARG
1964 — Piket, Joop vs Agnes, Corrado — 1-0 — Krakow POL
1973 — Shereshevski, Mikhail vs Vasiukov, Evgeni — 1-0 — URS Army
1985 — Ree, Hans vs Romanishin, Oleg M — 1/2-1/2 — Wijk aan Zee NED
1985 — Belistri, Ubaldo vs Vazquez, Lautaro Tomas — 1-0 — Uruguay
1970 — Knaak, Rainer vs Heinig, Wolfram, Dr. — 1/2-1/2 — Cesky Brod
2016 — Kocanovic, Armin vs Jovovic, Milan — 1/2-1/2 — Sarajevo BIH
1994 — Golder, Louis vs Aditya Tamrakar — 0-1 — Mineola
2006 — Hendi, Peter vs Czimer, Jozsef — 0-1 — ?