Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● f2→g3, h2→g3 | ● e6→d5, a7→b6, c7→b6, f7→e6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | ● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0) | — |
| Cases faibles | ● e4 | — |
| Centre | ● d4 (1v0), ● e5 (1v0) | ● d5 (4v3) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bg2 | ● Bg2 Actif (mob. 5) | |
| Bb7 | ● Bb7 Ok (mob. 3) | |
| Be7 | ● Be7 Actif (mob. 4) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 2 (● c1, ● a1) | 2 (● b8, ● a8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Roqué | ● Roqué |
| Droits de roque | — | — |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | fermé | |
| Ruptures | ● c4-c5 | — |
E18g — Queen’s Indian
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 d5 8.Ne5 ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Centre fermé
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plan principal. Jeu au centre (rupture c4-c5).
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de f4 et b5 et un fou actif en g2.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c1 et la tour a1).
Plans. cxd5 (Capture en d5, Occuper le centre — 39 % des parties) ; Qa4 (19 % des parties) ; e4 (Occuper le centre — 8 % des parties) ; Bf4 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 7 % des parties) ; b3 (Préparer le fianchetto — 7 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de f4 et b5 et un fou actif en g2.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c1 et la tour a1).
Plans. cxd5 (Capture en d5, Occuper le centre — 39 % des parties) ; Qa4 (19 % des parties) ; e4 (Occuper le centre — 8 % des parties) ; Bf4 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 7 % des parties) ; b3 (Préparer le fianchetto — 7 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plan principal. Manœuvres et amélioration des pièces.
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un fou actif en e7.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le cavalier b8 et la tour a8).
Plans. ...Nbd7 (Développer b8 — 31 % des parties) ; ...Na6 (Développer b8 — 28 % des parties) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 17 % des parties) ; ...Qc8 (11 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 6 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un fou actif en e7.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le cavalier b8 et la tour a8).
Plans. ...Nbd7 (Développer b8 — 31 % des parties) ; ...Na6 (Développer b8 — 28 % des parties) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 17 % des parties) ; ...Qc8 (11 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 6 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1920 Gothenburg – Round 6 – Rubinstein, Akiba – 0-1 – Bogoljubow, Efim – G35 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. Nc3 d5 7. Ne5 O-O 8. O-O c5 9. dxc5 Bxc5 10. Bf4 Ne4 |
| 1923 Copenhagen – Round 1 – Nimzowitsch, Aron – 1-0 – Saemisch, Friedrich – G8 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1924 Gyor – Round 1 – Havasi, Kornel – 0-1 – Vukovic, Vladimir – G25 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1927 Trebitsch mem11 – Round 2 – Lokvenc, Josef – 1/2-1/2 – Gruber, Theodor – G3 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. Nc3 Bb7 5. g3 Be7 6. Bg2 O-O 7. O-O d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. e4 Nxc3 |
| 1932 BCF Ch 25. Major Open – Round 10 – Koltanowski, George – 1-0 – Reeve, Harold Talbot – G15 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 Rd8 |
| 1934 Leningrad – Round 1 – Belavenets, Sergey – 1/2-1/2 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G47 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. Bf4 dxc4 10. Nxc4 Bxg2 |
| 1935 Warsaw ol Warsaw POL – Round 12 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1-0 – Steiner, Lajos – G22 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. g3 b6 4. Bg2 Bb7 5. O-O Be7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Qb3 c6 |
| 1936 Trebitsch mem19 – Round 15 – Opocensky, Karel – 1-0 – Keller, Hans – G45 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Ne4 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Qc2 Nxc3 |
| 1938 It AVRO – Round 14 – Euwe, Max – 1-0 – Capablanca, Jose – G12 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Ne4 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Nxe4 dxe4 |
| 1942 Chocen – Round ? – Saemisch, Friedrich – 1-0 – Keller, Rudolf – G26 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 e6 5. c4 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 c6 |
| 1942 Chocen NT – Round ? – Katetov, Miroslav – 1-0 – Kottnauer, Cenek – G12 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. d4 b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1946 Staunton, Groningen NED – Round 2 – Lundin, Erik – 0-1 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G7 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1947 Chigorin Memorial – Round ? – Kottnauer, Cenek – 1/2-1/2 – Tsvetkov, Alexandar K – G85 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. Nc3 d5 7. Ne5 O-O 8. O-O Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1947 Chigorin Memorial – Round 1 – Bondarevsky, Igor – 1-0 – Plater, Kazimierz – G20 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g3 d5 4. Bg2 Be7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. O-O b6 7. Ne5 Bb7 8. Nc3 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 c6 |
| 1949 JUG Ch – Round 3 – Tot, Bora – 1-0 – Nedeljkovic, Srecko M – G15 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. d4 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1949 Opatija m – Round 4 – Trifunovic, Petar – 1/2-1/2 – Najdorf, Miguel – G4 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1949 URS Ch, semi final – Round 16 – Bastrikov, Georgy – 1-0 – Aratovsky, Nikolay – G118 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. Nc3 d5 7. Ne5 O-O 8. O-O Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 Qe6 |
| 1950 Mar del Plata – Round 12 – Marini, Liam – 1-0 – Alvarez Martin, Pedro – G101 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. e4 Nxc3 |
| 1950 URS Ch sf Tartu – Round 3 – Novotelnov, Nikolai – 0-1 – Kholmov, Ratmir D – G2 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 Be7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. O-O b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. e4 Nxc3 |
| 1950 Venice – Round 5 – Szabados, Eugenio – 0-1 – Donner, Jan-Hein – G52 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. c4 e6 4. g3 Be7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. Bg5 dxc4 10. Qa4 Bxg2 |
| 1951 Augsburg – Round 14 – Heinicke, Herbert – 1-0 – Pfeiffer, Gerhard – G49 1. c4 e6 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 d5 4. Nf3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. d4 b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1951 Hungary Ch – Round 1 – Füster, Géza – 1-0 – Gracs, Pal – G11 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1951 URS Ch sf – Round 5 – Kopilov, Nikolay Georgiyevich – 0-1 – Smyslov, Vasily – G6 1. c4 e6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nf3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. d4 b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1953 Bucharest – Round 12 – Reicher, Emanoil-George – 1/2-1/2 – Smyslov, Vladimir – G116 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1953 Hoogovens – Round 9 – Füster, Géza – 1-0 – Bouwmeester, Hans – G50 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1954 Olympiad final B – Round 1 – Lindblom, Peter – 0-1 – Nievergelt, Erwin – G14 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. g3 b6 4. Bg2 Bb7 5. O-O Be7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. Bg5 dxc4 10. Nxc4 Bxg2 |
| 1960 Madrid zt – Round 1 – Portisch, Lajos – 1/2-1/2 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G4 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1960 Nimzowitsch Memorial – Round ? – Kolvig, Bent – 1-0 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G24 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 b6 3. Bg2 Bb7 4. O-O e6 5. c4 Be7 6. Nc3 O-O 7. d4 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1962 IBM – Round 1 – Dunkelblum, Arthur – 1-0 – Kool, Gerard – G14 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 b6 3. Bg2 Bb7 4. O-O e6 5. c4 Be7 6. Nc3 O-O 7. d4 d5 8. Ne5 c5 9. cxd5 exd5 10. dxc5 Bxc5 |
| 1964 BRA Ch – Round 2 – Dos Santos Teofilo, Alberto – 1-0 – Alves, Francisco H B Severino – G6 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 Rd8 |
| 1964 Hoogovens – Round ? – Van Scheltinga, Theo – 1-0 – Donner, Jan-Hein – G64 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 Qe6 |
| 1965 FRG Ch Bad Aibling – Round 13 – Besser, Hans – 1/2-1/2 – Huebner, Robert – G28 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g3 d5 4. Bg2 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. d4 b6 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 Bxd5 |
| 1965 Hastings6566 – Round 3 – Nicolai, Werner – 0-1 – Lee, Peter N – G13 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Bg5 Qe6 |
| 1967 Copenhagen – Round 1 – Blom, Kaj – 1-0 – Kennefick, M. – G11 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 e6 5. O-O Be7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1967 CSR Ch – Round 6 – Ujtelky, Maximilian – 1/2-1/2 – Augustin, Josef – G37 1. c4 e6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nf3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. d4 b6 7. Ne5 Bb7 8. Nc3 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. e4 Nf6 |
| 1967 Groningen – Round 1 – Zara, Dan – 1/2-1/2 – Karpov, Aleksandr – G1 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. g3 b6 4. Bg2 Bb7 5. O-O Be7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 d5 8. Ne5 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1968 Lasker Memorial – Round 1 – Barczay, Laszlo – 1/2-1/2 – Bronstein, Anna – G2 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 Be7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O b6 7. Ne5 Bb7 8. Nc3 Qc8 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nxd5 exd5 |
| 1968 Memorial Em. Lasker – Round 12 – Espig, Lutz – 0-1 – Zinn, Lothar – G36 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Be7 5. Bg2 Nf6 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Bb7 8. Ne5 Ne4 9. cxd5 exd5 10. Qc2 Nxc3 |
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1920 Gothenburg – Round 6 – Rubinstein, Akiba – 0-1 – Bogoljubow, Efim – G35
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1923 Copenhagen – Round 1 – Nimzowitsch, Aron – 1-0 – Saemisch, Friedrich – G8
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1924 Gyor – Round 1 – Havasi, Kornel – 0-1 – Vukovic, Vladimir – G25
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1927 Trebitsch mem11 – Round 2 – Lokvenc, Josef – 1/2-1/2 – Gruber, Theodor – G3
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1932 BCF Ch 25. Major Open – Round 10 – Koltanowski, George – 1-0 – Reeve, Harold Talbot – G15
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1934 Leningrad – Round 1 – Belavenets, Sergey – 1/2-1/2 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G47
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1935 Warsaw ol Warsaw POL – Round 12 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1-0 – Steiner, Lajos – G22
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1936 Trebitsch mem19 – Round 15 – Opocensky, Karel – 1-0 – Keller, Hans – G45
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1938 It AVRO – Round 14 – Euwe, Max – 1-0 – Capablanca, Jose – G12
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1942 Chocen – Round ? – Saemisch, Friedrich – 1-0 – Keller, Rudolf – G26
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1942 Chocen NT – Round ? – Katetov, Miroslav – 1-0 – Kottnauer, Cenek – G12
- Lire la suite
-
- E12-E19 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 Queen's Indian defence, E18 - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.Nc3 - Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, E18g - 8…* - Queen’s Indian, SÉRIE E
1946 Staunton, Groningen NED – Round 2 – Lundin, Erik – 0-1 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G7
- Lire la suite












