E17z — Queen’s Indian: Pomar, Polugaevsky, 8…c6 9.cxd5 Nxd5 10.Nf5 Nc7 11.e4

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.d5 exd5 8.Nh4 c6 9.cxd5 Nxd5 10.Nf5 Nc7 11.e4 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Nc3 (Développer b1 — 64 % des parties) ; Re1 (20 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...d5 (Occuper le centre — 87 % des parties) ; ...Ne6 (Cavalier actif en e6 — 6 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● f2→g3, h2→g3	● a7→b6, d7→c6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	● aile dame 3v2

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● d4 (2v0), ● f4 (2v0), ● d6 (2v1)	● b5 (2v0), ● c5 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (2v0), ● e4 (1v0)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● c, ● d	● e

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bg2	● Bg2 Ok (mob. 3)
Bb7		● Bb7 Mauvais (mob. 2)
Be7		● Be7 Actif (mob. 7)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1)	2 (● b8, ● a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Roqué	● Roqué
Droits de roque	—	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	—	● …d7-d5

Partie
22. ECU Club Cup 2006 – Round 7 – Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar – 1-0 – Jakovenko, Dmitry – G174 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
34. ECC Open 2018 – Round 2.5 – Abel Dieguez, Dario – 0-1 – Granda Zuniga, Julio E – G62 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
42. Olympiad 2016 – Round 2.16 – Kasimdzhanov, Rustam – 1-0 – Munoz Santana, Jose Lisandro – G91 1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. g3 b6 4. Bg2 Bb7 5. c4 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
Amber-blindfold 11th 2002 – Round 7 – Piket, Jeroen – 1/2-1/2 – Almasi, Zoltan – G20 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
EU-Cup 24th 2008 – Round 6 – Fridman, Daniel – 1/2-1/2 – Tomashevsky, Evgeny – G68 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
Saint Louis Rapid 2021 – Round 9.5 – Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar – 1/2-1/2 – Rapport, Richard – G45 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 e6 5. O-O Be7 6. d4 O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
World Blitz 2022 – Round 6.82 – Amangeldy, Ernur – 0-1 – Gurel, Ediz – G338 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7
World Rapid 2016 – Round 11.32 – Moiseenko, Alexander – 0-1 – Anton Guijarro, David – G424 1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. d5 exd5 8. Nh4 c6 9. cxd5 Nxd5 10. Nf5 Nc7

E17z — Pomar, Polugaevsky (2002)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7 6.O-O O-O 7.d5 exd5 8.Nh4 c6 9.cxd5 Nxd5 10.Nf5 Nc7 11.e4

Les coups candidats

11…d5 — 86.6% (622 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Salzmann, Stefan (6x), Elíson, Kári (6x), Brusiani, Angelo (5x), Tisdall, Jonathan D (3x), Tiviakov, Sergei (3x), Ruggieri, Oliviero (3x), Lukásová, Alena (3x), Dymek, Wladyslaw (3x)

11…Ne6 — 5.7% (41 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Cazzaniga, Walter (2x), Dymek, Wladyslaw (2x), Teske, Henrik (1x), Enders, Peter (1x), Azmaiparashvili, Zurab (1x), Chernin, Alexander (1x), Strobel, Holger (1x), Schoenwolff, Kai (1x)

11…Bf6 — 2.6% (19 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Otspere, Urmas (2x), Kurowski, Andrzej (2x), Sterling, F (1x), Perez Garcia, Hebert (1x), Rout, Ian C (1x), Gregory, Samuel David (1x), Kaspret, Guido (1x), Stucl, Bozo (1x)

11…Nba6 — 1.5% (11 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Ludevid i Massana, Joan (2x), Tonoli, Jose (1x), Limbos, Paul (1x), Gaya Llodra, Juan (1x), De La Cruz Lopez, Jesus (1x), Nielsen, Peter Heine (1x), De Firmian, Nick (1x), Bednar, Ma (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	11…d5	11…Ne6	11…Bf6	11…Nba6
<1800	16	88%	—	12%	—
1800-2200	239	83%	8%	3%	1%
2200-2600	406	89%	4%	2%	1%
2600+	31	97%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	11…d5	11…Ne6	11…Bf6	11…Nba6
1960s	1	—	—	—	100%
1970s	1	100%	—	—	—
1980s	15	67%	27%	—	—
1990s	71	69%	17%	4%	1%
2000s	175	87%	6%	1%	1%
2010s	355	88%	4%	3%	2%
2020s	100	95%	1%	3%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
11…d5	88%	95%	▲ +6.5%
11…Ne6	4%	1%	▼ -2.9%
11…Bf6	3%	3%	-0.4%
11…Nba6	2%	0%	▼ -2.3%

Parties historiques

11…d5 — 86.6% (622 parties)

1978 — Razuvaev, Yuri S vs Makarichev, Sergey — 1/2-1/2 — Tbilisi ch-URS
1980 — Douven, Rudy vs Pigusov, Evgeny — 0-1 — Groningen ch-EU jr
1980 — Alburt, Lev vs Peters, Alexander John — 1/2-1/2 — Hastings ENG
1984 — Yilmaz, Turhan vs Hon, Kah Seng Christie — 0-1 — Thessaloniki olm
1984 — Nielsen, Henning vs Bank Friis, Carsten — 0-1 — Fyn

11…Ne6 — 5.7% (41 parties)

1980 — Azmaiparashvili, Zurab vs Chernin, Alexander — 0-1 — Dnipropetrovsk
1986 — Teske, Henrik vs Enders, Peter — 1-0 — Nordhausen ch-DDR
1987 — Van de Marel, B vs Pliester, Leon — 1/2-1/2 — NED
1989 — Strobel, Holger vs Schoenwolff, Kai — 1-0 — Hamburg chJA
1990 — Gasseholm, Finn vs Lodge, David Wilfred — 0-1 — corr Wch17

11…Bf6 — 2.6% (19 parties)

1993 — Kaspret, Guido vs Stucl, Bozo — 0-1 — AUT-chT2S
1995 — Rout, Ian C vs Gregory, Samuel David — 1-0 — IECG, Cat-T corr
1997 — Sterling, F vs Perez Garcia, Hebert — 1/2-1/2 — WCH1/A1 SEMI
2001 — Roobol, Martin vs Van Arkel, Rogier — 1-0 — NED
2011 — Brunsteins, Daniel vs Helmreich, Rudolf — 1/2-1/2 — ICCF

11…Nba6 — 1.5% (11 parties)

1966 — Tonoli, Jose vs Limbos, Paul — 1/2-1/2 — Brussels BEL
1992 — Gaya Llodra, Juan vs De La Cruz Lopez, Jesus — 0-1 — Ponferrada
2007 — Nielsen, Peter Heine vs De Firmian, Nick — 0-1 — Copenhagen DEN
2012 — Bednar, Ma vs Jurasek, Miroslav — 1/2-1/2 — Czech Republic CZE
2015 — Jorgensen, Dennis vs greger roland — 1-0 — Denmark