Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | ● d5 | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | — | — |
| Passés | ● d5 | — |
| Majorité | — | ● aile dame 3v2 |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | ● b5 (2v0) | — |
| Cases faibles | — | ● d5 |
| Centre | ● d5 (2v1), ● e4 (1v0) | — |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Semi-ouvertes | ● c, ● e | ● d |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bf1 | ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bc8 | ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bf8 | ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 2) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) | 6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Au centre | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | O-O / O-O-O | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | ● f2-f3 | ● …e4-e3 |
D32l — QGD Tarrasch: Marshall Gambit, 6.d5
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.e4 dxe4 6.d5 * ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. Bg5 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer c1 — 47 % des parties) ; Bf4 (Fou actif (mobilité 10), Développer c1 — 33 % des parties) ; f3 (Rupture — 8 % des parties) ; Nh3 (Développer g1 — 6 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Nf6 (Développer g8 — 51 % des parties) ; ...f5 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 45 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1905 It (Men) Barmen GER – Round 8 – Forgacs, Leo – 1-0 – Nimzowitsch, Aron – G98 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bg5 Be7 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Nge2 a6 10. Ba4 Bg4 |
| 1905 It (Men) Stockholm SWE – Round 10 – Burn, Amos – 0-1 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G33 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Nh3 a6 9. f3 Nf6 10. fxe4 fxe4 |
| 1905 Ostende – Round 10 – Burn, Amos – 0-1 – Tarrasch, Siegbert – G31 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Nh3 a6 9. f3 Nf6 10. fxe4 fxe4 |
| 1908 Vienna – Round 1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – 0-1 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G6 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Bxd7+ Qxd7 9. Nh3 Bd6 10. Ng5 Na6 |
| 1908 Vienna – Round 1 – Marshall, Frank – 0-1 – Spielmann, Rudolf – G5 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Bxd7+ Qxd7 9. Nh3 Bd6 10. Ng5 Na6 |
| 1911 New York – Round 10 – Aadhyeta Roy – 0-1 – Chajes, Oscar – G17 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bg5 Be7 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Nge2 a6 10. Ba4 b5 |
| 1911 San Sebastian – Round 13 – Marshall, Frank – 0-1 – Důras, Oldřich – G77 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. f3 Bd6 8. Nh3 Nf6 9. Bb5+ Nbd7 10. fxe4 fxe4 |
| 1914 DSB-19.Kongress Hauptturnier A – Round 8 – Henneberger, Walter – 0-1 – Maliutin, Boris – G15 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Nh3 Nf6 8. Bb5+ Nbd7 9. Qa4 Bd6 10. Ng5 Qe7 |
| 1919 Amsterdam m1 – Round 9 – Euwe, Max – 1/2-1/2 – Kroone, Gerard – G9 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Bd6 7. Nxe4 Ne7 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Qf3 Bf5 10. Ne2 Bxe4 |
| 1920 Amsterdam m1 – Round 1 – Oskam, Arent Jan – 0-1 – Euwe, Max – G2 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Nh3 Bxb5 9. Nxb5 Qa5+ 10. Nc3 Na6 |
| 1935 Barcelona – Round 1 – Grob, Henry – 1/2-1/2 – Flohr, Salo – G7 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. f3 e3 8. Bxe3 Bd6 9. Bb5+ Nd7 10. Qe2 Qe7 |
| 1936 Dresden – Round 1 – Grob, Henry – 0-1 – Roedl, Ludwig – G3 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Bg5 Bd7 10. Bc4 Bf5 |
| 1957 Moskou ch-URS – Round 9 – Tolush, Alexander – 1-0 – Furman, Slavomir – G90 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Bb5+ Kf7 9. Nh3 Nf6 10. Bc4 a6 |
| 1962 Moscow RUS – Round 1 – Bronstein, David I – 1/2-1/2 – Aronin, Lev – G4 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bg5 Be7 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Nge2 a6 10. Ba4 b5 |
| 1963 GDR Ch Aschersleben GER – Round 11 – Starck, Bodo – 1-0 – Kahn, Manfred – G59 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Nge2 Bg4 10. Qd2 a6 |
| 1964 IBM-B – Round 7 – Van der Lijn, Dick – 0-1 – Wade, Robert G – G18 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 Nf6 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Bb5+ Kf8 9. Bg5 a6 10. Ba4 Bf5 |
| 1967 IBM – Round 1 – Ree, Hans – 1-0 – Enevoldsen, Jens – G4 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. cxd5 exd5 4. Nc3 c5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 a6 7. Qa4+ Bd7 8. Qxe4+ Qe7 9. Bf4 Nf6 10. Qxe7+ Bxe7 |
| 1967 USSR – Round 1 – Balashov, Yuri S – 1-0 – Grigorian, Levon – G12 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. e4 dxe4 6. d5 f5 7. Bf4 Bd6 8. Nh3 Nf6 9. Bb5+ Kf7 10. Bc4 a6 |













1963 — Starck, Bodo vs Kahn, Manfred — 1-0 — GDR-ch Aschersleben GER
1963 — Pantaleev, Dimitar Dimitrov vs Milev, Angel — 1-0 — Sofia BUL
1964 — Van der Lijn, Dick vs Wade, Robert G — 0-1 — Amsterdam NED
1966 — Henriksen, Palle V. vs Kolbak, Jens — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1957 — Tolush, Alexander vs Furman, Semyon — 1-0 — ?
1957 — Alexander Tadala vs Furman, Semyon — 1-0 — Moskou ch-URS
1957 — Tolush vs Furman, Albert — 1-0 — ?
1967 — Balashov, Yuri vs Grigorian, Levon — 1-0 — USSR
2009 — Lutterbey, Ralf vs Berger, Alfred Josef — 0-1 — GER