C96e — Spanish: Closed, Chigorin, 10…Bb7

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d6 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 Bb7 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. d4 (Occuper le centre — 90 % des parties) ; d3 (Solidifier le centre — 7 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Nc4 (Cavalier actif en c4 — 30 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 15 % des parties) ; ...Nd7 (10 % des parties) ; ...Nc6 (6 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● b2→c3, d2→c3, g2→h3	● a6→b5, d6→e5, c7→d6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	—	● c4 (2v0)
Cases faibles	● e4	—
Centre	● d4 (2v1)	● d5 (2v1)

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bc2	● Bc2 Ok (mob. 3)
Bb7		● Bb7 Actif (mob. 4)
Be7		● Be7 Ok (mob. 0)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1)	1 (● a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Roqué	● Roqué
Droits de roque	—	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c3-c4, ● d2-d4	● …d6-d5

Partie
1921 Budapest – Round 1 – Steiner, Endre – 0-1 – Bogoljubow, Efim – G49 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1926 Vienna – Round 2 – Wagner, Heinrich – 1/2-1/2 – Leonhardt, Paul – G10 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1938 URS Ch, semi final – Round 10 – Rovner, Dmitry – 1/2-1/2 – Shamaev, Leonid – G63 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1938 URS Ch, semi final – Round 16 – Panov, Vasily – 1-0 – Shamaev, Leonid – G67 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1942 Duras 60 Memorial – Round 9 – Saemisch, Friedrich – 0-1 – Junge, Kai – G39 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1950 Bled – Round 7 – Ivkov, Borislav – 1-0 – Puc, Stojan – G42 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1951 Bucharest GMT 2nd – Round 13 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – 1-0 – Molnar, Imre – G56 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1966 Hungary – Round 1 – Prelovszky, Laszlo – 1/2-1/2 – Honfi, K. – G26 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
1966 Tbilisi ch-URS – Round 17 – Suetin, Alexey S – 1/2-1/2 – Smyslov, Vladimir – G158 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. h3 O-O 9. c3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7
World Blitz 2017 – Round 12.50 – Almasi, Zoltan – 1-0 – Halkias, Stelios – G646 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 Bb7

C96e — Closed, Chigorin (1921)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d6 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 Bb7

Les coups candidats

11.d4 — 89.6% (172 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Karpov, Anatoly (3x), Kuzenkov, Anatoly Vasilievich (3x), Woolverton, Harry Ivor (2x), Suetin, Alexey S (2x), Renet, Olivier (2x), Thomsen, Keld (2x), Papp, Abel (2x), Bruyneel, Anita (2x)

11.d3 — 7.3% (14 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Pietzsch, Wolfgang (1x), Molnar, Imre (1x), Prelovszky, Laszlo (1x), Honfi, Karoly (1x), Ciric, Dragoljub M (1x), Karpov, Anatoly (1x), Espig, Lutz (1x), Liebert, Heinz (1x)

11.b4 — 2.1% (4 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Stock, Thomas (1x), Zimmerman, Adi (1x), ? (1x), PARSOS (1x), von Rosenberg, Clemens (1x), Farr, Michael (1x), Choremski, Slawomir (1x), Wisniewski, Wieslaw (1x)

11.a4 — 1.0% (2 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Kirk Jim (1x), Whittaker Dean (1x), Nastic, Milorad (1x), Jukic, Mihovil (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	11.d4	11.d3	11.b4	11.a4
<1800	18	83%	11%	6%	—
1800-2200	75	89%	9%	—	1%
2200-2600	31	94%	6%	—	—
2600+	1	100%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	11.d4	11.d3	11.b4	11.a4
1950s	4	75%	25%	—	—
1960s	6	67%	33%	—	—
1970s	11	91%	9%	—	—
1980s	10	100%	—	—	—
1990s	31	87%	10%	3%	—
2000s	73	89%	5%	3%	3%
2010s	55	93%	5%	2%	—
2020s	2	100%	—	—	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
11.d4	93%	100%	▲ +7.3%
11.d3	5%	0%	▼ -5.5%
11.b4	2%	0%	▼ -1.8%
11.a4	0%	0%	+0.0%

Joueurs célèbres

Champions du monde dans cette position

Karpov, Anatoly — 4 parties
Smyslov, Vladimir — 1 partie

Parties historiques

11.d4 — 89.6% (172 parties)

1950 — Ivkov, Borislav vs Puc, Stojan — 1-0 — Bled SLO
1953 — Pollitt, James D vs Woolverton, Harry Ivor — 1/2-1/2 — Hastings ch-BCF
1953 — Clarke, Peter vs Woolverton, Harry Ivor — 1/2-1/2 — Hastings ENG
1966 — Kudischewitsch, David vs Karpov, Anatoly — 0-1 — Vladimir
1966 — Hatlebakk, Einar vs Karpov, Anatoly — 0-1 — ?

11.d3 — 7.3% (14 parties)

1951 — Pietzsch, Wolfgang vs Molnar, Imre — 1-0 — Bucharest ROU
1966 — Prelovszky, Laszlo vs Honfi, Karoly — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN
1967 — Ciric, Dragoljub M vs Karpov, Anatoly — 1/2-1/2 — Groningen simultaan
1970 — Espig, Lutz vs Liebert, Heinz — 1/2-1/2 — Freiberg ch19-DDR
1991 — Hernandez Alvarez, Tania Regla vs Sanchez Cabrera, Circe Consuelo — 1-0 — Capablanca mem

11.b4 — 2.1% (4 parties)

1991 — Stock, Thomas vs Zimmerman, Adi — 1-0 — WT-II-GT-19
2001 — ? vs PARSOS — 0-1 — Maastricht NED
2002 — von Rosenberg, Clemens vs Farr, Michael — 0-1 — TSC
2011 — Choremski, Slawomir vs Wisniewski, Wieslaw — 0-1 — Poznan POL

11.a4 — 1.0% (2 parties)

2003 — Kirk Jim vs Whittaker Dean — 1/2-1/2 — ?
2009 — Nastic, Milorad vs Jukic, Mihovil — 1-0 — Croatia