Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● b2→c3, d2→c3	● a6→b5, d6→e5, c7→d6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	—	● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● e4 (2v1)	● e5 (2v1)

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bc2	● Bc2 Ok (mob. 3)
Be7		● Be7 Ok (mob. 0)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 6)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1)	2 (● c8, ● a8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Roqué	● Roqué
Droits de roque	—	—

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c3-c4, ● d2-d4	● …d6-d5

C90b — Spanish: Closed, Lutikov Variation

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d6 9.Bc2 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. d4 (Occuper le centre — 44 % des parties) ; d3 (Solidifier le centre — 25 % des parties) ; a4 (19 % des parties) ; h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 6 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Re8 (38 % des parties) ; ...Bb7 (Développer c8 — 19 % des parties) ; ...d5 (Occuper le centre — 12 % des parties) ; ...Bg4 (Fou actif (mobilité 7), Développer c8 — 12 % des parties) ; ...Nb8 (12 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A – Round 2 – De Groot, Adriaan – 1-0 – Fallet Kahn, Victor – G37 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. Bc2 Bg4 10. h3 Bh5
1965 Hamburg etc – Round 1 – Lutikov, Anatoly S – 1-0 – Fahnenschmidt, Gerhard – G42 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. Bc2 Re8 10. d4 Bg4
1967 GDR Ch – Round 9 – Schoeneberg, Manfred – 1-0 – Brameyer, Hermann – G13 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. Bc2 Re8 10. d4 exd4
1967 USSR – Round 1 – Kholmov, Ratmir D – 1-0 – Bakulin, Nikolac I – G42 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. Bc2 Bb7 10. d4 exd4
1968 Alma Ata ch-URS – Round 1 – Lutikov, Anatoly S – 1-0 – Klovans, Janis – G28 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. Bc2 Nb8 10. a4 Bb7
1968 Alma Ata ch-URS – Round 13 – Lutikov, Anatoly S – 1/2-1/2 – Zaitsev, Igor A – G120 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. Bc2 d5 10. exd5 Qxd5
1968 IBM II – Round 10 – Lutikov, Anatoly S – 1/2-1/2 – Tatai, Stefano – G20 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. Bc2 Nd7 10. a4 Nb6

C90b — Closed, Lutikov Variation (1907)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d6 9.Bc2

Les coups candidats

9…Bg4 — 34.0% (18 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Schoeneberg, Manfred (2x), Malmgren, Sven-Goran (1x), Nilsson, Zandor (1x), Pavlov, Mircea-Sergiu-Aurelian (1x), Drozd, Carol (1x), Fernandez, John C (1x), Hyborean, John H (1x), Gibson, Robert (1x)

9…Re8 — 18.9% (10 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Schoeneberg, Manfred (3x), Lutikov, Anatoly S (1x), Fahnenschmidt, Gerhard (1x), Brameyer, Hermann (1x), Vogt, Lothar (1x), Knaak, Rainer (1x), Lein, Andreas (1x), Lengyel, Agnes (1x)

9…d5 — 15.1% (8 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Verenzuela, Jesus (2x), Sprenger, Wendelin (1x), Jazun (1x), Lutikov, Anatoly S (1x), Zaitsev, Igor A (1x), Smith, Bryan (1x), Homa, Seth (1x), Norkin, Aleksey Viktorovich (1x)

9…Bb7 — 13.2% (7 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Lutikov, Anatoly S (1x), Keres, Paul Petrovich (1x), Kholmov, Ratmir D (1x), Bakulin, Nikolac I (1x), Schoeneberg, Manfred (1x), Stern, Rene (1x), Omega, Jose (1x), Nedic, Manny (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	9…Bg4	9…Re8	9…d5	9…Bb7
<1800	3	33%	—	67%	—
1800-2200	17	53%	12%	—	18%
2200-2600	18	17%	39%	22%	11%
2600+	1	—	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	9…Bg4	9…Re8	9…d5	9…Bb7
1960s	10	20%	20%	20%	20%
1970s	5	—	100%	—	—
1980s	2	—	—	—	50%
1990s	6	67%	17%	—	—
2000s	13	69%	—	8%	8%
2010s	15	20%	7%	27%	20%
2020s	2	—	50%	50%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
9…Bg4	20%	0%	▼ -20.0%
9…Re8	7%	50%	▲ +43.3%
9…d5	27%	50%	▲ +23.3%
9…Bb7	20%	0%	▼ -20.0%

Parties historiques

9…Bg4 — 34.0% (18 parties)

1965 — Pavlov, Mircea-Sergiu-Aurelian vs Drozd, Carol — 1/2-1/2 — Bucharest ROU
1968 — Malmgren, Sven-Goran vs Nilsson, Zandor — 1/2-1/2 — Goteborg SWE
1991 — Schoeneberg, Manfred vs Hjartarson, Johann — 0-1 — Duitsland tt
1995 — Fernandez, John C vs Hyborean, John H — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1997 — Gibson, Robert vs Kriechel, Ben — 0-1 — IECC

9…Re8 — 18.9% (10 parties)

1965 — Lutikov, Anatoly S vs Fahnenschmidt, Gerhard — 1-0 — Hamburg etc
1967 — Schoeneberg, Manfred vs Brameyer, Hermann — 1-0 — Colditz GER
1970 — Westerinen, Heikki M.J. vs Scholl, Eddie C — 1/2-1/2 — Siegen GER
1972 — Schoeneberg, Manfred vs Knaak, Rainer — 1/2-1/2 — Goerlitz
1972 — Lein, Andreas vs Lengyel, Agnes — 1-0 — Novi Sad SRB

9…d5 — 15.1% (8 parties)

1965 — Sprenger, Wendelin vs Jazun — 0-1 — ?
1968 — Lutikov, Anatoly S vs Zaitsev, Igor A — 1/2-1/2 — Alma Ata ch-URS
2009 — Smith, Bryan vs Homa, Seth — 1/2-1/2 — Wheeling USA
2014 — Verenzuela, Jesus vs Norkin, Aleksey Viktorovich — 1/2-1/2 — ICCF
2014 — Kaltschmidt, Andreas, Dr. vs Ter Steeg, Ronald — 0-1 — ICCF

9…Bb7 — 13.2% (7 parties)

1965 — Lutikov, Anatoly S vs Keres, Paul Petrovich — 1/2-1/2 — Ch URS team Moscow RUS
1967 — Kholmov, Ratmir D vs Bakulin, Nikolac I — 1-0 — USSR
1989 — Schoeneberg, Manfred vs Stern, Rene — 1-0 — Rostock GER
2006 — Omega, Jose vs Nedic, Manny — 1/2-1/2 — Palau
2010 — Reina Guerra, Emilio vs Skalický, Frantisek — 0-1 — ICCF