Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | — | ● a6→b5 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | — | ● b4 (2v0), ● c5 (2v0) |
| Cases faibles | ● c4 | ● g5 |
| Centre | — | ● d5 (2v1) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Semi-ouvertes | ● d | ● e |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Bb3 | ● Bb3 Ok (mob. 3) | |
| Be6 | ● Be6 Actif (mob. 5) | |
| Be7 | ● Be7 Actif (mob. 8) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1) | 2 (● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Roqué | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | — | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | — | ● …f7-f6 |
C81d — Spanish: Open, Keres, Adam Variation
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Qe2 Be7 10.c4 * ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. Ba4 (Clouer b5 — 56 % des parties) ; cxd5 (Capture en d5, Occuper le centre — 8 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...bxc4 (Capture en c4, Frapper le centre adverse — 92 % des parties) ; ...Nc5 (Cavalier actif en c5 — 8 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1946 Moscow – Round 1 – Keres Paul Petrovich – 0-1 – Bronstein, David I – G18 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. Qe2 Be7 10. c4 bxc4 |
| 1951 Buenos Aires – Round 1 – Pappier, Carlos – 0-1 – Puiggros, Guillermo – G23 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. Qe2 Be7 10. c4 bxc4 |
| 1951 Simul Prins clock – Round ? – Prins, Lodewijk – 1-0 – Borochow, Harry – G9 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. Qe2 Be7 10. c4 bxc4 |
| 1954 Munich zt – Round 6 – Aitken, James – 1/2-1/2 – Donner, Jan-Hein – G39 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. Qe2 Be7 10. c4 bxc4 |
-
- C80-C89 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 & C84-C89 C84 5. O-O Be7 Ruy Lopez, closed defence, C81 - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Qe2 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1948), C81d - 10.c4 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1946), SÉRIE C
1946 Moscow – Round 1 – Keres Paul Petrovich – 0-1 – Bronstein, David I – G18
- Lire la suite
-
- C80-C89 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 & C84-C89 C84 5. O-O Be7 Ruy Lopez, closed defence, C81 - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Qe2 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1948), C81d - 10.c4 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1946), SÉRIE C
1951 Buenos Aires – Round 1 – Pappier, Carlos – 0-1 – Puiggros, Guillermo – G23
- Lire la suite
-
- C80-C89 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 & C84-C89 C84 5. O-O Be7 Ruy Lopez, closed defence, C81 - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Qe2 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1948), C81d - 10.c4 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1946), SÉRIE C
1951 Simul Prins clock – Round ? – Prins, Lodewijk – 1-0 – Borochow, Harry – G9
- Lire la suite
-
- C80-C89 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 & C84-C89 C84 5. O-O Be7 Ruy Lopez, closed defence, C81 - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.Qe2 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1948), C81d - 10.c4 - Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack (1946), SÉRIE C
1954 Munich zt – Round 6 – Aitken, James – 1/2-1/2 – Donner, Jan-Hein – G39
- Lire la suite





1950 — Abiolla James vs Penrose, Justin — 1-0 — London ENG
1950 — Abiolla James vs Penrose, Jonathan — 0-1 — Ilford ENG
1951 — Prins, Lodewijk vs Borochow, Harry — 1-0 — Hollywood, CA
1951 — Pappier, Carlos vs Puiggros, Guillermo — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1974 — Bjoerkqvist, Armas vs Maes, Jacques — 1-0 — ?