Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● d6→e5, c7→d6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● d4 (2v1), ● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (2v1), ● e5 (2v1)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bb5 ● Bb5 Actif (mob. 7)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf8 ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Clouages ● knight c6
Non développées 3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1) 4 (● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Roqué ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre fermé
Ruptures ● d2-d4 ● …d6-d5

C66c — Spanish: Closed Berlin, 5.Re1

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O d6 5.Re1 *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bB
bQ
bK
bB
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bN
bP
bN
wBFou actif — mobilité 7
bP
wPPion central
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wN
wB
wQ
wR
wK
abcdefgh
Plans. c3 (Renforcer le centre — 59 % des parties) ; d4 (Occuper le centre — 14 % des parties) ; h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 13 % des parties) ; Ba4 (Clouer c6 — 8 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wK
wR
wQ
wB
wN
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
Case forte (2v0)
wP
Case forte (2v1)
bP
wB
bN
bP
bN
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bB
bK
bQ
bBFou actif — mobilité 5
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Be7 (Développer f8 — 45 % des parties) ; ...Bd7 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c8 — 28 % des parties) ; ...Bg4 (Fou actif (mobilité 7), Développer c8 — 14 % des parties) ; ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 10 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1910 Buenos Aires sim – Round ? – Israel, Alfredo – 0-1 – Lasker, Emanuel – G11
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d3 Ne8 8. Nbd2 f5 9. exf5 Bxf5 10. h3 Nf6
1910 Hamburg Hauptturnier-B – Round 1 – Barasz, Zsigmond – 1-0 – Lueth, Christian – G3
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. O-O Nf6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d4 Bd7 8. Bxc6 Bxc6 9. Nbd2 Nd7 10. Nf1 b6
1924 BCF Ch 17th – Round 10 – Price, Hubert E – 0-1 – Fairhurst, William – G47
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. d4 exd4 7. Nxd4 Bd7 8. Nc3 O-O 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. b3 Re8
1926 Chicago – Round 10 – Jaffe, Charles – 1-0 – Fink, Adolf Jay – G22
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Bd7 9. Nc3 a6 10. Ba4 b5
1928 Giessen – Round 1 – Kmoch, Hans – 1/2-1/2 – Orbach Wilhelm – G3
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. c3 Be7 7. h3 O-O 8. Ba4 Nb8 9. Bc2 c6 10. d4 Qc7
1952 Helsinki olm – Round 1 – Mangini, Jose Henrique de Mello – 1-0 – Garcia Lambert, Hugo – G176
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. c3 a6 7. Ba4 b5 8. Bc2 Be7 9. d3 h6 10. Nbd2 O-O
1953 Glasgow International – Round 3 – Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham – 1-0 – Fairhurst, William – G8
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. d4 exd4 7. Bxc6+ bxc6 8. Nxd4 Bd7 9. Nc3 O-O 10. Qf3 Re8
1953 Glasgow International – Round 5 – Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham – 1/2-1/2 – Wade, Robert G – G14
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. d4 Bd7 7. c3 O-O 8. Ba4 exd4 9. Nxd4 Nxd4 10. cxd4 Bxa4
1953 Hastings Premier 1952/53 28th – Round 4 – Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham – 0-1 – Fairhurst, William – G9
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. h3 O-O 7. c3 Bd7 8. Ba4 Na5 9. Bc2 c5 10. d4 Nc6
1953 Opatija – Round 13 – Nikolac, Juraj – 1/2-1/2 – Vidmar Milan – G93
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. d4 Be7 7. Nc3 exd4 8. Nxd4 O-O 9. Nde2 Ne5 10. Bxd7 Qxd7
1953 Venetie – Round 4 – Schmid, Lothar – 1/2-1/2 – Toran Albero, Roman – G7
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d4 Bd7 8. Nbd2 Nxd4 9. cxd4 Bxb5 10. Qb3 c6
1954 Hastings5455 – Round 1 – Fuderer, Andrija – 1/2-1/2 – Fairhurst, William – G3
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. c3 Be7 7. Na3 O-O 8. Nc2 Re8 9. d4 Nxd4 10. Ncxd4 exd4
1958 BUL Ch – Round ? – Popov, Vladimir – 0-1 – Filchev, Rusko – G59
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. c3 Be7 7. d4 O-O 8. Ba4 Re8 9. Nbd2 Bf8 10. Bc2 g6
1958 YUG Ch sf – Round 1 – Guzel Leo – 1/2-1/2 – Udovcic, Mijo – G2
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. O-O Nf6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. h3 Nd7 8. d4 Bf6 9. Be3 Ne7 10. Nbd2 c6
1960 Paignton Premier 10th – Round 3 – Mardle, Denis – 1/2-1/2 – Harris, Peter A – G12
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Bd7 6. c3 g6 7. d4 Bg7 8. Na3 O-O 9. dxe5 Nxe5 10. Nxe5 dxe5
1964 Tel Aviv olm fin-B – Round 3 – Hindle, Owen M – 1-0 – Abad Gonzalez, Jose Miguel – G36
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. d4 exd4 7. Nxd4 Bd7 8. Bxc6 Bxc6 9. Nc3 Bd7 10. b3 O-O
1965 Mar del Plata – Round 10 – Stein, Leon Rico – 1-0 – Benko, Pal – G81
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d4 Bd7 8. a4 Bg4 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. dxe5 Bxf3
1965 Mar del Plata – Round 10 – Stein, Leonid – 1-0 – Benko, Pal – G80
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O d6 5. Re1 Be7 6. c3 O-O 7. d4 Bd7 8. a4 Bg4 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. dxe5 Bxf3

C66c — Spanish: Closed Berlin (1910)
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O d6 5.Re1
Les coups candidats
5…Be7 — 44.9% (730 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Campora, Daniel H. (6x), Kebis, Milos (5x), Pessi, Emil-George (4x), Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham (3x), Fairhurst, William (2x), Benko, Pal (2x), Ondersteijn, Niels (2x), Hoiberg, Nina (2x)
5…Bd7 — 28.5% (463 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Fairhurst, William (4x), Gutierrez Castillo, Oscar (3x), Herr Jeff (3x), Jacobsen, Benjamin Hojvang (2x), Rasmussen, Barry (2x), Devesa Raris, Victor Hugo (2x), Guralivu, Paul Iosif (2x), Sabirova, Olga (2x)
5…Bg4 — 14.1% (229 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Evans, Larry (1x), Barnes, Robert H (1x), Arun, Dhilan (1x), Celis Stephane (1x), Glew, Richard (1x), Jahangir Shah (1x), Feibert, Petra (1x), Pranner, Marion (1x)
5…a6 — 10.3% (167 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Hansen, Soren Bech (1x), Andersen, Tage (1x), Arias Sastre, Angel (1x), Gonzalez Reguera, Luis Felipe (1x), Altena, R. (1x), Leydes, A. (1x), Marquet, Guillermo (1x), Gorintin, Alain (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 5…Be7 5…Bd7 5…Bg4 5…a6
<1800 334 48% 21% 17% 11%
1800-2200 561 48% 27% 13% 11%
2200-2600 157 47% 48% 3% 3%
2600+ 1 100%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 5…Be7 5…Bd7 5…Bg4 5…a6
1950s 16 44% 50% 6%
1960s 17 53% 35% 12%
1970s 28 50% 43% 4% 4%
1980s 56 38% 50% 4% 9%
1990s 301 40% 30% 20% 8%
2000s 581 43% 29% 16% 10%
2010s 496 49% 24% 12% 12%
2020s 131 50% 25% 9% 14%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
5…Be7 49% 50% ▲ +1.8%
5…Bd7 24% 25% ▲ +0.8%
5…Bg4 12% 9% ▼ -2.7%
5…a6 12% 14% ▲ +2.0%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Smyslov, Vladimir — 1 partie
Carlsen, Magnus — 1 partie
Parties historiques
5…Be7 — 44.9% (730 parties)
1953 — Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham vs Wade, Robert G — 1/2-1/2 — Glasgow SCO
1953 — Schmid, Lothar vs Toran Albero, Roman — 1/2-1/2 — Venetie
1953 — Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham vs Fairhurst, William — 0-1 — White Rock Pavilion
1953 — Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham vs Fairhurst, William — 1-0 — Glasgow SCO
1956 — Kallas, Hans Joachim vs Mauer, Manfred — 1/2-1/2 — Zittau
5…Bd7 — 28.5% (463 parties)
1952 — Mangini, Jose Henrique de Mello vs Lambert, Hans — 1-0 — Helsinki olm
1953 — Nikolac, Juraj vs Vidmar, Milan Sr — 1/2-1/2 — Opatija
1954 — Fuderer, Andrija vs Fairhurst, William — 1/2-1/2 — Hastings ENG
1956 — Colon, A. vs Fairhurst, William — 1-0 — Moskou olm
1956 — Andersen, Richard vs Jorgensen, Leon — 0-1 — Nyborg
5…Bg4 — 14.1% (229 parties)
1958 — Evans, Larry vs Barnes, Robert H — 1-0 — City Terrace, CA
1964 — Arun, Dhilan vs Celis Stephane — 1-0 — Krakow POL
1968 — Glew, Richard vs Jahangir Shah — 0-1 — Swansea WLS
1976 — Feibert, Petra vs Pranner, Marion — 1-0 — Groeditz
1983 — Hansen, Soren Bech vs Godoy San Martin, Ignacio — 1-0 — Copenhagen DEN
5…a6 — 10.3% (167 parties)
1971 — Burchardt, Brigitte vs Broeder, Karin — 1-0 — Halle GER
1983 — Arias Sastre, Angel vs Gonzalez Reguera, Luis Felipe — 0-1 — Valladolid
1984 — Hansen, Soren Bech vs Andersen, Tage — 1/2-1/2 — match
1986 — Altena, R. vs Leydes, A. — 0-1 — ACCOM III
1988 — Strizak, Natasa vs Pilotelle, Barbara — 1-0 — Dortmund GER

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger