C47n — Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit, 5…Be7

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Be7 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bB
bQ
bK
bR
bP
bP
bPPion sous pression
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bN
bN
wN
Case forte (2v0)
bPPion sous pression
wPpawn en prise !
Case forte (2v0)
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wQ
wK
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. Bf4 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer c1 — 48 % des parties) ; Bc4 (Fou actif (mobilité 6), Développer f1 — 28 % des parties) ; Nxd4 (Cavalier centralisé en d4 — 22 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wB
wK
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wPpawn en prise !
bPPion sous pression
Case forte (2v1)
wN
bN
bN
bP
bP
bP
bBFou actif — mobilité 5
bP
bPPion sous pression
bP
bP
bR
bK
bQ
bB
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...d6 (Libérer Bc8 — 56 % des parties) ; ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 25 % des parties) ; ...Nxd5 (Cavalier centralisé en d5 — 12 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés ● d4, ● d7
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● f4 (2v0), ● g5 (2v0) ● b4 (2v1)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (2v1) ● e4 (1v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes ● d ● e
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Be7 ● Be7 Actif (mob. 5)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 4 (● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 3 (● c8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● c2-c3 ● …d4-d3
Partie
1945 Novi Sad – Round 2 – Radojcic, Slobodan – 0-1 – Pirc, Vasja – G51
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 Bf6 10. Qd3 d6
1947 GBR Ch 34th – Round 10 – Crown, Gordon – 1-0 – Fairhurst, William – G46
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bb5 O-O 7. O-O a6 8. Bxc6 dxc6 9. Nxe7+ Qxe7 10. e5 Nd5
1949 Moskou ch-URS – Round 16 – Liublinsky, Victor – 1-0 – Keres, Paul – G161
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 d6 7. Bb5 Bd7 8. O-O O-O 9. Nxc6 Bxc6 10. Bd3 Nxd5
1949 Trencianske Teplice – Round 19 – Sefc, Jan – 0-1 – Szabo, Ladislav – G125
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 d6 7. Bb5 Bd7 8. O-O Nxd5 9. exd5 Nxd4 10. Bxd7+ Qxd7
1956 Alekhine Memorial – Round 1 – Padevsky, Nikola – 0-1 – Smyslov, Vladimir – G76
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 Bf6 10. Qd3 d6
1956 Copenhagen – Round 1 – Andersen, Henrik – 1-0 – Andersen, Borge – G14
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 O-O 7. Nf5 Nxd5 8. exd5 Re8 9. Be2 Ne5 10. d6 Bf6
1956 CSR Ch – Round 12 – Holas, Josef – 1-0 – Florian, Jaromir – G111
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 Nxe4 8. Nb5 O-O 9. Nbxc7 Bf6 10. Bd3 Nxf2
1956 Dresden – Round 9 – Trajkovic, Dusan – 0-1 – Fuchs, Reinhart – G60
1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nb5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Ne5 10. Be2 c6
1957 New York ch-USA – Round 2 – Bernstein, Sidney – 1-0 – Di Camillo, Attilio – G10
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nb5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Ne5 10. Qd2 Ng6
1957 Warchau ch POL – Round 14 – Witkowski, Stefan – 1/2-1/2 – Dworzynski, Roman – G77
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 Nxd5 8. exd5 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 Bf6 10. Qe4+ Qe7
1958 Hamburg Ch – Round 6 – Clemens, Christian, Dr. – 0-1 – Ahues, Carl – G13
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nc3 Re8 9. Be2 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 Nd7
1958 Hamburg Ch – Round 7 – Clemens, Christian, Dr. – 1-0 – Klaeger, Lutz – G16
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nc3 Re8 9. Be2 Bd7 10. O-O h6
1959 Candidates Tournament women – Round 15 – Ladanyike-Karakas, Eva – 1/2-1/2 – Zvorykina, Kira – G56
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 Bf6 9. Qe4+ Qe7 10. Qxe7+ Kxe7
1959 Wch U20 fin-A – Round 3 – Phillips, James Rodney – 1/2-1/2 – Hamann, Svend – G12
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 Nxd5 8. exd5 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 Bf6 10. Qe4+ Qe7
1961 CSR Ch – Round 4 – Acosta Fabian, Janna Paloma – 1/2-1/2 – Pachman, Ludek – G37
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nc3 Re8 9. Bb5 Bd7 10. O-O Bf8
1961 Zagreb – Round 5 – Cuderman, Vinko – 1/2-1/2 – Karaklajic, Nikola – G56
1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 Nxd5 9. exd5 Bf6 10. Qe3+ Qe7
1962 Paris FRA – Round ? – Druon, Roger – 0-1 – Boutteville, Cesar – G17
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 O-O 7. Bf4 Nxd5 8. exd5 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 Bf6 10. Qb4 a5
1963 Budapest ch-HUN – Round 1 – Szilagyi, Peter – 0-1 – Kluger, Gyula – G165
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bb5 O-O 7. O-O d6 8. Nxd4 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 Nxd5 10. exd5 Bf6
1963 Europe Team Ch qual – Round 5.2 – Markus, Marcel – 1-0 – Lokvenc, Josef – G25
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 d6 10. O-O Bf5
1964 Kecskemet zt – Round 1 – Damjanovic, Marko – 1-0 – Bilek, Istvan – G72
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bc4 O-O 7. O-O d6 8. Nxd4 Nxd5 9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. exd5 Bb7
1964 Zagreb – Round 6 – Damjanovic, Mato – 1/2-1/2 – Matanovic, Aleksandar – G34
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 d6 10. O-O Bf5
1965 Pardubice – Round 3 – Petras, Jan – 1/2-1/2 – Novak, Ervin – G35
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nb5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Ne5 10. Be2 Ng6
1967 DEN Ch – Round 4 – Moe, Mogens – 1/2-1/2 – Pedersen, Carl Aage – G13
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 Bf6 10. Qd3 d6
1968 DDR Ch 17th – Round 3 – Espig, Lutz – 1/2-1/2 – Hennings, Artur – G15
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 d6 10. O-O Bf5
1968 Lugano ol (Men) – Round ? – Gibbs, Grantel – 0-1 – Keller, Dieter – G101
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nb5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Ne5 10. Qd2 Ng6
1969 Castlebar Open – Round 2 – Moe, Mogens – 1-0 – McCurdy, Gerald – G7
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Bf4 d6 7. Nxd4 O-O 8. Nb5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Ne5 10. Be2 Bf6
1971 Hoogovens – Round 1 – Danov, Kiril – 1/2-1/2 – Kostro, Jerzy – G182
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 Bf6 10. Qc4 d6
Interpolis 1979 – Round 2 – Sax van der Weijden, Daan – 1/2-1/2 – Karpow, Werner – G12
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Be7 6. Nxd4 Nxd5 7. exd5 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 O-O 9. Be2 Bf6 10. Qd1 d6

C47n — Belgrade Gambit (1945)
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Be7
Les coups candidats
6.Bf4 — 48.0% (594 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Cvicela, Anton (11x), Weiss, Frederic (9x), Lauer, Frederic (9x), Bellon Lopez, Juan Manuel (8x), Van der Weide, Karel (8x), Fietz, Harald (5x), Szulc, Stanislaw (5x), Felczer, Kevin (4x)
6.Bc4 — 27.9% (346 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Simmelink, Joop Theo (16x), Bulgarini Torre, Marco (12x), Hector, Jonny (8x), Langheld, Werner (7x), Prie, Eric (5x), Kraft, Karl-Heinz, Prof. Dr. (4x), Kireev, Sergey (4x), Elier, Ali (4x)
6.Nxd4 — 21.6% (267 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Kuhn, Gerhard (6x), Blackstone, John (5x), Pletanek, Jan (5x), Trumpp, Lothar (4x), Tal, Mikhail (3x), Saigin, Vladimir (2x), Westerinen, Heikki M.J. (2x), Reinwald, Patrick (2x)
6.Bd3 — 1.9% (24 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Sychev, Klementy (2x), Bastrikov, Georgy (1x), Krogius, Nikolai V (1x), Helmbold, Irene (1x), Sattel, Dominique (1x), Jap Tjoen San, Linda (1x), Kalisvaart, Peter (1x), Martensen, Helmut (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 6.Bf4 6.Bc4 6.Nxd4 6.Bd3
<1800 61 52% 21% 21% 3%
1800-2200 508 48% 29% 21% 2%
2200-2600 390 48% 28% 22% 2%
2600+ 3 33% 33% 33%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 6.Bf4 6.Bc4 6.Nxd4 6.Bd3
1950s 28 54% 4% 36% 4%
1960s 34 32% 9% 50%
1970s 54 46% 24% 30%
1980s 75 51% 24% 25%
1990s 330 58% 25% 15% 1%
2000s 423 52% 30% 16% 1%
2010s 230 37% 32% 31% 1%
2020s 64 11% 47% 25% 17%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
6.Bf4 37% 11% ▼ -25.6%
6.Bc4 32% 47% ▲ +15.1%
6.Nxd4 31% 25% ▼ -5.9%
6.Bd3 1% 17% ▲ +16.3%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Tal, Mikhail — 3 parties
Karpov, Anatoly — 1 partie
Parties historiques
6.Bf4 — 48.0% (594 parties)
1953 — Ruester, Otto vs Pallwitz, Otto — 0-1 — Jena GER
1955 — Witkowski, Stefan vs Solecki, Zbigniew — 1/2-1/2 — Wroclaw POL
1955 — Curdo, John vs Lai, Harry K — 1-0 — Westfield,MA
1955 — Hobza, Jan vs Florian, Tibor — 0-1 — Brno CZE
1956 — Holas, Josef vs Weiner, Milan — 1-0 — Bratislava SVK
6.Bc4 — 27.9% (346 parties)
1953 — Ludajic vs Alexandrov, Bianca Alberta — 0-1 — Serbia
1964 — Damjanovic, Mato vs Bak, Istvan — 1-0 — Kecskemet HUN
1967 — Trajkovic, Mihailo vs Stieg, Bastian, Dr. — 1-0 — corr
1968 — Trajkovic, Aleksandar vs Stieg, Bastian, Dr. — 1-0 — cr.
1970 — Hunter Chalid vs Heemsoth, Hermann — 0-1 — cr.
6.Nxd4 — 21.6% (267 parties)
1953 — Tal, Mikhail vs Kampenuss, Peteris — 1/2-1/2 — Riga LAT
1954 — Tal, Mikhail vs Saigin, Vladimir — 1/2-1/2 — Riga LAT
1954 — Tal, Mikhail vs Saigin, Vladimir — 1/2-1/2 — Riga LAT
1955 — Nan Shwe Yin Thun vs Lukes, Alexander — 0-1 — Prague CZE
1955 — Schopka, W vs Salm, Maxwell — 1/2-1/2 — ICCF 172C year?
6.Bd3 — 1.9% (24 parties)
1951 — Bastrikov, Georgy vs Krogius, Nikolai V — 0-1 — RUS-ch Yaroslavl
1994 — Dusova, Petra vs Reznickova, Lenka — 1-0 — Czech Republic ch
1997 — Jap Tjoen San, Linda vs Kalisvaart, Peter — 1-0 — Leiden NED
1997 — Martensen, Helmut vs Muelders, Oliver — 1/2-1/2 — Mecklenburg VP
1999 — Helmbold, Irene vs Sattel, Dominique — 1/2-1/2 — Oberhof

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger