Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● c2→d3, d3→e4	—
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	—	● g4 (2v1)
Cases faibles	—	● d5
Centre	—	● d4 (1v0), ● e4 (2v1)

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bc4	● Bc4 Actif (mob. 4)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	5 (● b1, ● g1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	5 (● b8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● d3-d4, ● f2-f4	—

C24e — Bishop’s Opening: 3.d3 d5

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 d5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. exd5 (Capture en d5, Occuper le centre — 100 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Nbd7 (Développer Nb8) ; ...Be7 (Développer Bf8) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse) ; ...d4 (Occuper le centre).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1902 Monte Carlo Monte Carlo MNC – Round 10 – Teichmann, Richard – 1-0 – Marco, Georg – G12 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Qe2 Nc6 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Nf6 9. O-O a6 10. Nc3 Be7
1903 Monte Carlo – Round 16 – Mason, Jack – 0-1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – G28 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Qe2 Nc6 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. Bb5 Bd6 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 Nb4 10. Qd1 a6
1905 It (Men) Barmen GER – Round 1 – Leonhardt, Paul – 0-1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – G39 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Bg4 7. Re1 Be7 8. h3 Bh5 9. g4 Bg6 10. Nxe5 Nxe5
1914 BCF Ch 11th – Round 1 – Blackburne, Joseph – 1-0 – Lean, Richard Edward – G1 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Bg4 7. Re1 Bc5 8. d4 Nxd4 9. Rxe5+ Ne7 10. Bxf7+ Kf8
1931 Buenos Aires – Round 4 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1-0 – Palau, Luis – G37 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. h3 Bxf3 7. Qxf3 c6 8. O-O Nf6 9. Re1 Nbd7 10. d4 Bd6
1938 URS Ch, semi final – Round 1 – Abramian, S. – 0-1 – Romanovsky, Pjotr – G50 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Be7 7. Re1 Bg4 8. h3 Bh5 9. g4 Bg6 10. Nxe5 Nxe5
1938 URS Ch, semi final – Round 1 – Freiman, Sergey Nikolaevich – 1-0 – Konstantinopolsky, Alexander – G38 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Be7 7. Re1 f6 8. d4 Nb6 9. Bb3 Bg4 10. c3 Qd7
1941 Lasker Memorial – Round ? – Levitan, Irving – 0-1 – Borochow, Harry – G12 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Qe2 Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Nf6 9. Bb5 Qd6 10. Nc3 O-O-O
1948 South Fallsburg ch-USA – Round 1 – Ulvestad, Olaf – 1-0 – Howard, Franklin Sandford – G69 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. h3 Bxf3 7. Qxf3 c6 8. O-O Nf6 9. Re1 Bd6 10. d4 Nbd7
1956 Moscow olm prel – Round 2 – Milner Barry, Philip – 1-0 – Walsh, James – G58 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Qf3 Nf6 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. Nge2 Bg4 8. Qg3 Qd7 9. h3 Bh5 10. O-O O-O-O
1961 URU Ch sf – Round ? – Albi Bachini Conti, Silvia – 1/2-1/2 – Olivera, Alfredo – G9 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Nb6 7. Bb3 Bg4 8. Re1 Bd6 9. Nxe5 Nxe5 10. Qxg4 O-O
1964 Amsterdam Interzonal – Round 7 – Larsen, Benjamin Holsko – 1-0 – Berger, Benedikt – G65 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. O-O Bg4 7. Re1 Be7 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 Nd4 10. Qg4 O-O

C24e — Bishop’s Opening (1902)

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 d5

Les coups candidats

4.exd5 — 97.7% (776 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Tylecek, Drahomir (5x), Richter, Gerhard, Dr. (3x), Zelic, Mladen (3x), Torre, Leandro (3x), Hector, Jonny (3x), Kosanski, Stanko (2x), Agacinski, Tadeusz (2x), Galego, Luis (2x)

4.Bb3 — 1.6% (13 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Marsiglia, Gennaro (1x), Giampaolo, Marco (1x), Larsen, Helge (1x), Methi, Steinar (1x), Walton, James (1x), Guelker, Lorenz (1x), Kahlert, Philipp (1x), Wagenknecht Fabian (1x)

4.Bxd5 — 0.3% (2 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Biolek, Richard Jr. (1x), Ondracek, Jan (1x), Taylor, Thor (1x), Youakim, James (1x)

4.Nf3 — 0.1% (1 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Klein, Maik (1x), Priebe, Ralf (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	4.exd5	4.Bb3	4.Bxd5	4.Nf3
<1800	89	98%	1%	—	—
1800-2200	369	100%	—	—	—
2200-2600	119	99%	1%	—	—
2600+	2	100%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	4.exd5	4.Bb3	4.Bxd5	4.Nf3
1950s	1	100%	—	—	—
1960s	8	100%	—	—	—
1970s	8	100%	—	—	—
1980s	27	100%	—	—	—
1990s	175	98%	1%	1%	1%
2000s	294	96%	3%	0%	—
2010s	235	99%	0%	—	—
2020s	46	98%	2%	—	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
4.exd5	99%	98%	▼ -1.3%
4.Bb3	0%	2%	▲ +1.7%
4.Bxd5	0%	0%	+0.0%
4.Nf3	0%	0%	+0.0%

Parties historiques

4.exd5 — 97.7% (776 parties)

1956 — Milner Barry, Philip vs Walsh, James — 1-0 — Moscow RUS
1961 — Bachini, A. vs Olivera, Alfredo — 1/2-1/2 — URU
1964 — Gaylor, Ed vs Csoli, Odon — 1-0 — Oakland
1964 — Larsen, Bent vs Berger, Thomas — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED
1964 — Larsen Christoffer Ryge vs Berger, Bela — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED

4.Bb3 — 1.6% (13 parties)

1991 — Marsiglia, Gennaro vs Giampaolo, Marco — 1-0 — Asiago ITA
2000 — Mai Felicitas vs Brauner, Steffen — 1-0 — ?
2001 — Walton, James vs Guelker, Lorenz — 0-1 — ?
2001 — Kahlert, Philipp vs Wagenknecht Fabian — 0-1 — Neumuenster
2001 — Esser, Jan vs Scholten, Simon — 0-1 — Kleve GER

4.Bxd5 — 0.3% (2 parties)

1999 — Biolek, Richard Jr. vs Ondracek, Jan — 1/2-1/2 — Svetla nad Sazavou
2000 — Taylor, Thor vs Youakim, James — 0-1 — Churchill

4.Nf3 — 0.1% (1 parties)

1994 — Klein, Maik vs Priebe, Ralf — 0-1 — Gaylord N MI op