Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	● c2, ● c3	—
Pions isolés	● a4	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● c3→d4, d4→e5	● e6→d5, f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● b5 (2v1), ● g5 (2v0)	● f5 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	● e5
Centre	● d4 (3v2), ● e5 (2v1)	● d5 (2v0), ● e4 (1v0)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● b	—

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 7)
Bf1	● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous	● Oui	Non
Clouages	● pawn c3	—
Non développées	4 (● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1)	3 (● c8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c3-c4	● …f7-f6

C19n — French: Winawer, 6…Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Qa5

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Qa5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Bd2 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 58 % des parties) ; Qd2 (Prépare O-O-O — 41 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Bd7 (Développer c8 — 84 % des parties) ; ...c4 (Frapper le centre adverse — 6 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

├── C19n - 9.Qd2 - French: Winawer (1942) [+0.35] · 51 parties

│ ├── C19o - 9…Bd7 - French: Winawer (1939) [+0.43] · 39 parties

│ └── C19n - 9…* - French: Winawer · 12 parties

└── C19p - 9.Bd2 - French: Winawer (1944) [+0.36] · 40 parties

├── C19q - 9…Bd7 - French: Winawer (1947) [+0.38] · 25 parties

│ ├── C19q - 10.* - French: Winawer · 21 parties

│ └── C19r - 10.Bb5 - French: Winawer (1964) [+0.30] · 4 parties

└── C19p - 9…* - French: Winawer · 15 parties

Les parties, variante par variante

151 partiesC19n - 9.Qd2 - French: Winawer (1942)

240 partiesC19p - 9.Bd2 - French: Winawer (1944)

C19n — Winawer

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Qa5

Les coups candidats

9.Bd2 — 63.1% (1125 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Uhlmann, Wolfgang (15x), Suetin, Alexey S (10x), Bukal, Vladimir Jr. (8x), Ciocaltea, Victor (7x), Ivkov, Borislav (6x), Timman, Jan H (6x), Hernando Rodrigo, Julio Antonio (6x), Roselli Mailhe, Bernardo (5x)

9.Qd2 — 36.4% (648 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Uhlmann, Wolfgang (9x), Scacco, Mauro (8x), Zalys, Ignas (7x), Bukal, Vladimir Jr. (7x), Bogdanovic, Rajko (6x), Korchnoi, Viktor (6x), ? (5x), Faleg, Alberto (4x)

9.Bb5 — 0.3% (5 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Whymark (1x), Blake, Matthew (1x), Skibbe, Willi (1x), Forchmann, Anneliese (1x), Baroin, Bernard (1x), Latronico, Nicola (1x), Cranbourne, Carlos (1x), Dayse Lemos Vescovi (1x)

9.Be2 — 0.2% (3 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Kunelius, Teemu (1x), Salermo, Valle (1x), Luciani, Jean-Francois (1x), Autran, Yann (1x), Matinian, Nikita (1x), Nikolaev, Alexander (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	9.Bd2	9.Qd2	9.Bb5	9.Be2
<1800	57	81%	18%	—	2%
1800-2200	496	67%	33%	—	0%
2200-2600	646	62%	38%	0%	—
2600+	9	100%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	9.Bd2	9.Qd2	9.Bb5	9.Be2
1950s	17	47%	53%	—	—
1960s	79	46%	54%	—	—
1970s	218	57%	42%	—	0%
1980s	364	62%	37%	0%	—
1990s	448	64%	35%	0%	—
2000s	399	67%	32%	1%	1%
2010s	224	65%	35%	—	—
2020s	33	85%	15%	—	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
9.Bd2	65%	85%	▲ +20.1%
9.Qd2	35%	15%	▼ -19.7%
9.Bb5	0%	0%	+0.0%
9.Be2	0%	0%	+0.0%

Joueurs célèbres

Champions du monde dans cette position

Anand, Viswanathan — 1 partie

Parties historiques

9.Bd2 — 63.1% (1125 parties)

1953 — Boleslavsky, Isaac vs Anay Barche — 1/2-1/2 — Bucharest ROU
1955 — Milner Barry, Philip vs Clarke, Peter — 1/2-1/2 — Aberystwyth ch-BCF
1955 — Gilg, Karl vs Rodriguez Garcia, Jesus — 0-1 — Luxembourg
1957 — Humerez Estrada, Cidar vs Esposito, Alfredo — 1/2-1/2 — Rio de Janeiro BRA
1958 — Gipslis, Aivars vs G.k.p., Rubel — 1-0 — Tashkent UZB

9.Qd2 — 36.4% (648 parties)

1950 — Gladwin, F. vs Thompson, Harry — 1-0 — England
1952 — Byschev, V vs Khasin, A — 1/2-1/2 — URS
1952 — Fletzer, Gino vs Ceccato, Vittorio — 0-1 — Ferrara
1953 — Reichel, Ewald vs Roessel, Frits — 1/2-1/2 — Copenhagen DEN
1955 — Rolland, Pierre vs Mititelu, Gheorghe — 1/2-1/2 — Bucharest ROU

9.Bb5 — 0.3% (5 parties)

1983 — Whymark vs Blake, Matthew — 0-1 — corr GB
1999 — Skibbe, Willi vs Forchmann, Anneliese — 1/2-1/2 — Oberhof
1999 — Baroin, Bernard vs Latronico, Nicola — 0-1 — ICCF Email
2000 — Brandstaetter, Friedrich vs Konrad, Edmund — 1/2-1/2 — Austria
2004 — Cranbourne, Carlos vs Dayse Lemos Vescovi — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG

9.Be2 — 0.2% (3 parties)

1979 — Kunelius, Teemu vs Salermo, Valle — 1-0 — corr NS/III
2008 — Luciani, Jean-Francois vs Autran, Yann — 0-1 — Porticcio
2008 — Matinian, Nikita vs Nikolaev, Alexander — 1-0 — Saratov