C19m — French: Winawer, 6…Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Bd7

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Bd7 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bQ
bK
bR
bP
bP
bBMauvais fou (5/8 pions)
bN
bP
bP
bP
bN
bP
Case forte (2v0)
bPpawn en prise !
bP
wPPion central
Case forte (2v0)
wPPion isolé — cible
wPPion central
wP
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wBFou actif — mobilité 7
wQ
wK
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. Be2 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer f1 — 46 % des parties) ; Bd3 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer f1 — 32 % des parties) ; Ba3 (Développer c1 — 8 % des parties) ; Bb5 (Clouer c6, Fou actif (mobilité 6), Développer f1 — 7 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wB
wK
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
wP
wPPion isolé — cible
Avant-poste C (accessible)
wP
bP
bPpawn en prise !
bP
bN
bP
bP
bP
bN
bBMauvais fou (5/8 pions)
bP
bP
bR
bK
bQ
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Qa5 (Contrôle diagonale a5-e1, Prépare O-O-O — 49 % des parties) ; ...Qc7 (Prépare O-O-O — 24 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés ● c2, ● c3
Pions isolés ● a4
Arriérés
Chaînes ● c3→d4, d4→e5 ● e6→d5, f7→e6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● b5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v0) ● f5 (2v0)
Cases faibles ● e5
Centre ● d4 (3v2), ● e5 (2v1) ● d5 (2v0), ● e4 (1v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes ● b
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 7)
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bd7 ● Bd7 Mauvais (mob. 1)
Paire de fous ● Oui Non
Non développées 4 (● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 2 (● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre fermé
Ruptures ● c3-c4 ● …f7-f6
Partie
1943 Sverdlovsk – Round 2 – Kan, Ilya A – 1/2-1/2 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G14
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Ba3 cxd4 10. cxd4 Qa5+
1943 Sverdlovsk – Round 5 – Smyslov, Vladimir – 1/2-1/2 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G25
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Qc7 10. O-O h6
1950 Moskou ch-URS – Round 1 – Liublinsky, Victor – 1/2-1/2 – Sokolsky, Alexey – G107
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Qa5 10. O-O Nf5
1950 URS Ch sf Gorky – Round 2 – Nezhmetdinov, Rashid – 1-0 – Liublinsky, Victor – G2
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Be2 Qa5 10. Bd2 c4
1952 Moskou ch-URS – Round ? – Byvshev, Vasily – 0-1 – Geller, Efim P – G171
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 c4 10. Be2 Qa5
1953 Candidats Tournament – Round 16 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – 1/2-1/2 – Stahlberg, Gideon – G105
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Rc8 10. O-O O-O
1957 DDR Ch 08th – Round 13 – Hartmann, Klaus – 1/2-1/2 – Bertholdt, Dieter – G84
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Ba3 Qa5 10. Qd2 cxd4
1958 GDR Ch Schkopau GER – Round 1 – Fiensch, Guenter – 0-1 – Franz, Joachim – G3
1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Ba3 Qa5 10. Qd2 cxd4
1959 Riga – Round 1 – Gipslis, Aivars – 1-0 – Franz Alpizar, Tomas – G50
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Qa5 10. Qd2 Rc8
1959 Riga – Round 1 – Klavins, Janis – 0-1 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G52
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Qc7 10. O-O f6
1960 Leningrad tt – Round 1 – Chalhasuren, Gonchich – 0-1 – Bertholdt, Dieter – G13
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qa5 10. Qd2 c4
1960 New York ch-USA – Round 8 – Fischer, Raphael – 1-0 – Sherwin, James T – G37
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qa5 10. Qd2 c4
1960 URS Ch sf – Round 16 – Gufeld, Eduard – 1/2-1/2 – Bagirov, Vladimir – G125
1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Bd7 8. a4 Nbc6 9. Be2 Qc7 10. O-O f6
1960 URS Ch sf – Round 2 – Novopashin, Arkady – 0-1 – Uusi, Gunnar – G15
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qc7 10. O-O c4
1961 CSR Ch sf – Round 7 – Jaros, Martin – 0-1 – Fichtl, Jiri – G15
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Qd2 O-O 10. Ba3 c4
1961 Wch U20 fin-A – Round 5 – Westerinen, Heikki M.J. – 1/2-1/2 – Vinje, Arne – G13
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Ba3 Qa5 10. Qd2 cxd4
1962 Varna olm – Round 4 – Zandifar – 0-1 – Foguelman, Alberto – G196
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 Qa5 10. Bd2 Qc7
1963 Alekhine Memorial – Round 3 – Gligorić, Svetozar – 1-0 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G20
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qa5 10. Qd2 c4
1963 Leipzig Open 6364 2nd – Round 1 – Schoeneberg, Manfred – 0-1 – Franz, Joachim – G5
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Nf3 Bd7 8. a4 Nbc6 9. Be2 Qa5 10. O-O c4
1964 Chicago simultaan – Round 1 – Fischer, Raphael – 0-1 – Diebert, G. – G17
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qa5 10. Qd2 c4
1964 Kiev ch-URS – Round ? – Vasiukov, Evgeni – 0-1 – Korchnoi, Viktor – G157
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Be2 f6 10. exf6 gxf6
1964 Kiev ch-URS – Round 1 – Lutikov, Anatoly S – 1/2-1/2 – Liavdansky, Vladimir – G117
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. Nf3 c5 6. a3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Be2 Qa5 10. O-O c4
1964 Rubinstein Memorial – Round 12 – Schmidt, Waldemar – 1-0 – Kostro, Jerzy – G54
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. a4 Nbc6 8. Nf3 Bd7 9. Bd3 Qa5 10. Qd2 Rc8
1965 Hoogovens – Round 3 – Langeweg, Kick – 1/2-1/2 – Ivkov, Borislav – G34
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Nf3 Bd7 8. a4 Nbc6 9. Bd3 c4 10. Be2 Qa5
1968 Sarajevo – Round 15 – Mestrovic, Zvonimir – 1/2-1/2 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G106
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Nf3 Bd7 8. a4 Nbc6 9. Be2 Qa5 10. Qd2 Rc8
1969 URS Ch sf – Round ? – Tukmakov, Vladimir B – 1/2-1/2 – Bronstein, David I – G18
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Nf3 Nbc6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Ba3 b6 10. Qd2 Qc7

C19m — Winawer (1943)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Nf3 Nbc6 8.a4 Bd7
Les coups candidats
9.Be2 — 46.5% (202 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Pietzsch, Wolfgang (3x), Timar, Zsolt (3x), Suetin, Alexey S (3x), Sokolsky, Alexey (2x), Boleslavsky, Isaac (2x), Liublinsky, Victor (2x), Franz, Joachim (2x), Gatto, Claudio (2x)
9.Bd3 — 32.3% (140 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Fischer, Robert J (3x), Skorna, Ullrich (3x), Van Leusden, Jacques (2x), Gutierrez Herrera, Jose Antonio (2x), Unzicker, Ferdinand, Dr. (2x), Oren, Itamar (2x), ? (2x), Melamedoff, Gustavo (2x)
9.Ba3 — 8.3% (36 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Tukmakov, Vladimir B (2x), Bronstein, David I (2x), Westerinen, Heikki M.J. (1x), Vinje, Arne (1x), Hartmann, Klaus (1x), Bertholdt, Dieter (1x), Moreira, Benedito (1x), Stenzel, Erbo (1x)
9.Bb5 — 6.7% (29 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Gulko, Boris (2x), Babula, Milan (2x), Netusil, Miloslav (2x), Moody, David W (2x), Kalegin, Evgenij (2x), Maier, Christian (2x), Ebeling, Mika (1x), Luce, Sebastien (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 9.Be2 9.Bd3 9.Ba3 9.Bb5
<1800 14 43% 29% 14% 7%
1800-2200 124 38% 40% 6% 8%
2200-2600 104 36% 34% 11% 14%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 9.Be2 9.Bd3 9.Ba3 9.Bb5
1950s 13 62% 15% 15%
1960s 31 42% 32% 16%
1970s 51 63% 31% 2% 4%
1980s 99 62% 25% 6% 2%
1990s 97 36% 38% 10% 12%
2000s 93 33% 43% 9% 8%
2010s 44 50% 16% 9% 14%
2020s 6 50%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
9.Be2 50% 0% ▼ -50.0%
9.Bd3 16% 50% ▲ +34.1%
9.Ba3 9% 0% ▼ -9.1%
9.Bb5 14% 0% ▼ -13.6%
Parties historiques
9.Be2 — 46.5% (202 parties)
1950 — Liublinsky, Victor vs Sokolsky, Alexey — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1950 — Nezhmetdinov, Rashid vs Liublinsky, Victor — 1-0 — URS-ch sf Gorky
1953 — Boleslavsky, Isaac vs Stahlberg, Gideon — 1/2-1/2 — Zurich SUI
1953 — Boleslavsky, Isaac vs GIDEON SUNDAY — 1/2-1/2 — Zurich SUI
1955 — Van den Berg, Carel B vs Karper, Jacob G — 1-0 — Amsterdam NED
9.Bd3 — 32.3% (140 parties)
1952 — Byvshev, Vasily vs Geller, Efim P. — 0-1 — Moskou ch-URS
1953 — Woronzoff, Larry vs Spinner, Louis — 1-0 — Hollywood, CA
1960 — Chalhasuren, Gonchich vs Bertholdt, Dieter — 0-1 — Leningrad RUS
1960 — Fischer, Robert J vs Sherwin, James T — 1-0 — New York, NY USA
1960 — Novopashin, Arkady vs Uusi, Gunnar — 0-1 — Vilnius LTU
9.Ba3 — 8.3% (36 parties)
1957 — Hartmann, Klaus vs Bertholdt, Dieter — 1/2-1/2 — Soemmerda
1958 — Fiensch, Guenter vs Franz, Joachim — 0-1 — GDR-ch Schkopau GER
1961 — Westerinen, Heikki M.J. vs Vinje, Arne — 1/2-1/2 — The Hague NED
1962 — Bouna, Safwan younes vs Gragger, Anton Fritz — 1-0 — Varna BUL
1965 — Moreira, Benedito vs Stenzel, Erbo — 0-1 — Rio de Janeiro BRA
9.Bb5 — 6.7% (29 parties)
1976 — Tseshkovsky, Vitaly vs Gulko, Boris — 0-1 — Moskou ch-URS
1976 — Chestnov, Vitaliy A. vs Gulko, Boris — 0-1 — URS
1983 — Ciszewski, Artur vs Nucos — 1-0 — corr ICCF
1984 — Ebeling, Mika vs Luce, Sebastien — 1/2-1/2 — Oakham ENG
1990 — Wedberg, Tom vs Manninen, Marko — 1-0 — SWE-FIN Eksjo SWE

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger