Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	● e4, ● e6
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● b2→a3	● f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	—	● d5 (2v1)
Cases faibles	● d4	—
Centre	● e4 (1v0)	● d4 (2v1), ● d5 (2v1)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● e	● d

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bb5	● Bb5 Actif (mob. 7)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous	● Oui	Non
Clouages	—	● knight c6
Non développées	3 (● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	4 (● g8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	● d4-d5, ● f2-f3	● …e4-e3, ● …e6-e5

C15s — French: Winawer, Alekhine Gambit, Kan, 7.Bb5

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Ne2 dxe4 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Nxc3 Nc6 7.Bb5 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Bg5 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer c1 — 64 % des parties) ; Nxe4 (Cavalier centralisé en e4 — 20 % des parties) ; Be3 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 12 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Ne7 (Développer g8 — 94 % des parties) ; ...Bd7 (Développer c8 — 3 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A – Round 7 – De Groot, Adriaan – 1/2-1/2 – Flores Alvarez, Rodrigo – G140 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 Qd5 9. Qd3 f5 10. Ng3 Qxg2
1939 Vienna – Round 2 – Engels, Ludwig – 0-1 – Fink, Alea – G9 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 O-O 9. c3 e5 10. dxe5 Qxd1+
1941 Buenos Aires Circulo – Round 11 – Pilnik, Herman – 1-0 – Czerniak, Moshe – G41 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 f5 10. Qh5+ g6
1947 Chigorin Memorial – Round ? – Pachman, Ludek – 1/2-1/2 – Bondarevsky, Igor – G100 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1947 Leningrad ch-URS – Round 1 – Bronstein, David I – 1/2-1/2 – Bondarevsky, Igor – G41 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 O-O 9. c3 e5 10. dxe5 Qxd1+
1948 Saltsjobaden Interzonal – Round 6 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1/2-1/2 – Bondarevsky, Igor – G53 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 O-O 9. c3 e5 10. Bxc6 Nxc6
1950 Dubrovnik olm – Round 13 – Palda, Karl – 0-1 – Letelier Martner, Rene – G198 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1950 Mar del Plata – Round 6 – Pilnik, Herman – 1/2-1/2 – Alvarez Martin, Pedro – G53 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1952 Budapest – Round 16 – Pilnik, Herman – 1-0 – Troianescu, Octav – G144 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1954 URS Team Ch – Round 5 – Bastrikov, Georgy – 0-1 – Bannik, Anatolij – G90 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 Qd5 9. Qe2 O-O 10. c3 f5
1960 Bariloche – Round 2 – Dominguez, Cristobal – 1/2-1/2 – Bianco Esposito, Antonio – G19 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1961 Mar del Plata – Round 4 – Aguilar Dominguez, Cristhel Guadalupe – 1-0 – Perez Perez, Francisco Jose – G47 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1961 Montevideo – Round 5 – Dominguez, Cristobal – 0-1 – Letelier Martner, Rene – G28 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 f5 10. Qh5+ Ng6
1964 Bordeaux Open Bordeaux FRA – Round 4 – Thiellement, Andre – 1/2-1/2 – Durão, Joaquim Manuel – G23 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6 3. e4 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 Qd5 9. Qd3 f5 10. Ng3 O-O
1964 Bordeaux Open Bordeaux FRA – Round 9 – Thiellement, Andre – 1/2-1/2 – Clarke, Peter H – G57 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6 3. e4 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Bg5 f6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 f5
1966 IBM-B – Round 5 – Enevoldsen, Jens – 1-0 – Dueckstein, Andreas – G16 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 O-O 9. c3 e5 10. Bxc6 Nxc6
1974 Manila – Round 7 – Gheorghiu, Florin – 1/2-1/2 – Gligoric, Svetozar – G119 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Ne2 dxe4 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Nxc3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Ne7 8. Nxe4 e5 9. Bg5 Qxd4 10. Qxd4 exd4

C15s — Winawer, Alekhine Gambit, Kan (1939)

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Ne2 dxe4 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Nxc3 Nc6 7.Bb5

Les coups candidats

7…Ne7 — 91.2% (1086 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Hector, Jonny (10x), Knaak, Rainer (7x), Uhlmann, Wolfgang (7x), Mueller, Karsten, Dr. (6x), Gipslis, Aivars (6x), Contin, Daniel (6x), Westerinen, Heikki M.J. (6x), Pilnik, Herman (5x)

7…Bd7 — 6.0% (71 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Rubinstein, Andres (1x), Ramirez Gonzalez, Julio Santiago (1x), Abdullah, Billah (1x), F Aparasi (1x), Wall, Bill (1x), Aparisi, Fabian (1x), Norrelykke, Svend G J (1x), Maslik, Waclaw (1x)

7…f5 — 1.4% (17 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Fanjul Garcia-San Miguel, Jose Luis (1x), Gorbea Yoller, Pablo (1x), Sarkisian, Telman (1x), Mokatsian, Akob Arsenovic (1x), Littlewood, Paul E (1x), Short, Nigel D (1x), Petzenhauser, Isfried, Dr (1x), Gerdes, Hans (1x)

7…Nf6 — 1.3% (15 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Edwards, Matthew (2x), Oshiro, Michael (2x), Gobet, Fernand (1x), Ditzler, Juerg (1x), Summers, Charles (1x), Fish, Andrew (1x), Piccini, Marco (1x), Chaslot De France, Timothee (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	7…Ne7	7…Bd7	7…f5	7…Nf6
<1800	46	65%	28%	4%	2%
1800-2200	432	88%	9%	1%	2%
2200-2600	525	97%	1%	1%	0%
2600+	2	100%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	7…Ne7	7…Bd7	7…f5	7…Nf6
1950s	11	100%	—	—	—
1960s	13	77%	8%	8%	—
1970s	17	82%	12%	6%	—
1980s	217	98%	1%	0%	0%
1990s	277	91%	5%	2%	2%
2000s	326	90%	8%	1%	0%
2010s	228	89%	8%	1%	3%
2020s	102	88%	7%	3%	2%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
7…Ne7	89%	88%	-0.4%
7…Bd7	8%	7%	▼ -1.0%
7…f5	1%	3%	▲ +2.1%
7…Nf6	3%	2%	▼ -0.7%

Parties historiques

7…Ne7 — 91.2% (1086 parties)

1950 — Pilnik, Herman vs Martin M Pereira — 1/2-1/2 — Mar del Plata ARG
1950 — Pilnik, Herman vs Martin M Pereira — 1/2-1/2 — Mar del Plata ARG
1950 — Palda, Karl vs Letelier Martner, Rene — 0-1 — Dubrovnik olm
1951 — Libner, Georg vs Uhlmann, Wolfgang — 0-1 — DDR-chJ Berlin-Ost
1951 — Pilnik, Herman vs Donner, H. — 1-0 — Hoogovens Beverwijk

7…Bd7 — 6.0% (71 parties)

1962 — Rubinstein, Andres vs Ramirez Gonzalez, Julio Santiago — 1-0 — Mar del Plata ARG
1973 — Abdullah, Billah vs F Aparasi — 1-0 — California
1973 — Wall, Bill vs Aparisi, Fabian — 1-0 — Marysville, CA
1986 — Norrelykke, Svend G J vs Maslik, Waclaw — 1/2-1/2 — corr Baltic tt
1987 — Karlsen, Sverre vs Christiansen, Joergen Schou — 1-0 — Tromsoe

7…f5 — 1.4% (17 parties)

1967 — Fanjul Garcia-San Miguel, Jose Luis vs Gorbea Yoller, Pablo — 1/2-1/2 — Palma de Majorca ESP
1979 — Littlewood, Paul E vs Short, Nigel D — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1981 — Sarkisian, Telman vs Mokatsian, Akob Arsenovic — 1/2-1/2 — Erevan ARM
1991 — Donald Gabbidon vs Walker, James — 1-0 — WV State CS, Rd Bd
1993 — Leiser, Sven vs Ilgner, Andreas — 1-0 — Landes-Einzelmeister

7…Nf6 — 1.3% (15 parties)

1985 — Gobet, Fernand vs Ditzler, Juerg — 1-0 — Lausanne SUI
1993 — Edwards, Matthew vs Oshiro, Michael — 1/2-1/2 — Seattle ch-WA
1993 — Edwards, Matthew vs Oshiro, Michael — 1/2-1/2 — Washington DC Seattl
1994 — Summers, Charles vs Fish, Andrew — 1/2-1/2 — Cardiff WLS
1997 — Piccini, Marco vs Chaslot De France, Timothee — 1/2-1/2 — Vitinia

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →