Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	● e4, ● e6
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	● f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v0)	● c5 (2v0), ● d5 (2v1)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● e4 (2v1)	● d5 (2v1), ● e5 (1v0)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Ouvertes	● d	● d
Semi-ouvertes	● e	—

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bf1	● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bd2	● Bd2 Actif (mob. 5)
Bb4		● Bb4 Actif (mob. 7)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	4 (● g1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1)	5 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	semi-ouvert
Ruptures	● f2-f3	● …e4-e3

C15i — French: Winawer, Mueller-Zhuravlev Gambit, Kunin Variation

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bd2 dxe4 5.Qg4 Qxd4 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre semi-ouvert

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. O-O-O (Roi en sécurité côté dame, tour active sur colonne d — 75 % des parties) ; Nf3 (Menace d4, Développer g1 — 20 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...h5 (43 % des parties) ; ...f5 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 20 % des parties) ; ...Nf6 (Menace g4, Développer g8 — 16 % des parties) ; ...Nh6 (Menace g4, Développer g8 — 13 % des parties) ; ...Qf6 (Centraliser la dame, Prépare O-O-O — 6 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1901 Monte Carlo – Round 1 – Marshall, Frank – 1/2-1/2 – Chigorin, Mikhail – G2 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6 3. e4 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O f5 7. Bg5 Qxf2 8. Qh3 Be7 9. Kb1 Bd7 10. g4 Nc6
1938 Ljubljana – Round 10 – Kostic, Boris – 1-0 – Brueder, M. – G71 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 Qf6 7. Qxe4 Qe7 8. O-O-O Nf6 9. Qh4 Nc6 10. g4 Bd7
1948 Moskou ch-URS – Round 10 – Keres, Paul – 1-0 – Levenfish, Grigory – G92 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O f5 7. Qg3 Bd6 8. Bf4 Bxf4+ 9. Qxf4 Qc5 10. f3 Ne7
1949 BUL Ch – Round 14 – Benderev, Yurij – 0-1 – Karastoichev, Emil – G67 1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O f5 7. Qg3 Bd6 8. Bf4 Bxf4+ 9. Qxf4 Qc5 10. f3 Nf6
1949 BUL Ch – Round 15 – Padevsky, Nikola – 1/2-1/2 – Benderev, Yurij – G75 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O f5 7. Qg3 Bd6 8. Bf4 Bxf4+ 9. Qxf4 Qc5 10. f3 Ne7
1950 Candidats Playoff 1pl – Round 14 – Boleslavsky, Isaac – 0-1 – Bronstein, David I – G11 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8 8. Qh6 Bf8 9. Qh4 Rg4 10. Qh3 Qxf2
1951 Buenos Aires ch-ARG – Round 1 – Puig-Gros Camats, Xavier – 1-0 – Alonso-Lej De Las Casas, Fernando – G9 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8 8. Qh6 Rg6 9. Qh4 Nc6 10. Bg5 Qe5
1951 Mar del Plata zt – Round 4 – Letelier Martner, Rene – 1/2-1/2 – Alvarez Martin, Pedro – G39 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8 8. Qh6 Bf8 9. Qf4 Bd6 10. Qh4 Rg4
1953 Bognor Regis Premier – Round 1 – Gross, Henry – 0-1 – Wade, Robert G – G1 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 Nh6 7. Qf4 e5 8. Nxd4 exf4 9. Bxf4 c6 10. O-O-O Bxc3
1956 Mar del Plata – Round 7 – Redolfi, Argentino Rodolfo – 1/2-1/2 – Idigoras Guisasola, Gregorio – G44 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8 8. Qh6 Bf8 9. Qh4 Rg4 10. Qh3 Qxf2
1957 Minsk zt – Round 16 – Ostrauskas, A – 1/2-1/2 – Shagalovich, Abo – G115 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O Nf6 7. Qxg7 Rg8 8. Qh6 Bf8 9. Qe3 Qxe3 10. Bxe3 Bd7
1961 Marianske Lazne zt – Round 2 – Ljungquist, Lennart – 0-1 – Uhlmann, Wolfgang – G13 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O h5 7. Qg3 Bd6 8. Bf4 h4 9. Qg5 Qf6 10. Qxf6 Nxf6
1962 Gera ch GDR – Round 9 – Neukirch, Detlef – 1/2-1/2 – Golz, Werner – G21 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 h5 7. Qxe6+ Bxe6 8. Nxd4 Bxc3 9. Bxc3 Nf6 10. Nxe6 fxe6
1962 Spartak Ch – Round 17 – Cherepkov, Alexander V – 1-0 – Khasin, Abram – G128 1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O h5 7. Qe2 Bd7 8. Nxe4 Bxd2+ 9. Rxd2 Qb4 10. a3 Qe7
1964 YUG Ch 19th – Round 17 – Velimirovic, Dragoljub – 0-1 – Ivkov, Borislav – G15 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 h5 7. Qxe6+ Bxe6 8. Nxd4 Bd7 9. O-O-O Nf6 10. Bc4 O-O
1966 Hungary – Round 1 – Tompa, Janos – 1/2-1/2 – Prelovszky, Laszlo – G27 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 Nh6 7. Qxe6+ Bxe6 8. Nxd4 Bd7 9. Nxe4 Bxd2+ 10. Nxd2 Nc6
1969 Budapest ch-HUN – Round 1 – Barczay, Laszlo – 1-0 – Farago, Ivan – G87 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O h5 7. Qh4 Be7 8. Bg5 Qe5 9. Bxe7 Nxe7 10. Nxe4 Nbc6
1969 Corr – Round ? – Eriksson, Bo HT – 0-1 – Korelov, Alexander P – G18 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 dxe4 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. O-O-O h5 7. Qg3 Bd6 8. Bf4 h4 9. Rxd4 hxg3 10. Bxd6 cxd6

C15i — Winawer Variation, Fingerslip Variation, Kunin Double Gambit (1901)

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bd2 dxe4 5.Qg4 Qxd4

Les coups candidats

6.O-O-O — 68.2% (304 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Rhodin, Christian (5x), Hausner, Ivan (4x), Jensen, Allan Astrup (3x), Hansen, Lars-Henrik Bech (3x), Kunin, Dan (2x), Al Osaimi, Kaiid Ahmad (2x), Briem, Stefan (2x), Peetoom, Frank F (2x)

6.Nf3 — 26.7% (119 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Bakheet Farag (9x), Schiller, Eric (5x), Read, Michael John (2x), Nelson, Jonathan P (2x), Bielczyk, Jacek (2x), Sax, Gyula (2x), Brendel, Oliver (2x), Thorhallsson, Throstur (2x)

6.Nge2 — 4.7% (21 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Kallas, Hans Joachim (1x), Rautenstrauch, Hans Hubert (1x), Bortkowski, G. (1x), Korte, Holger, Prof. Dr. (1x), Mueller, Klaus Uwe (1x), Grottke, Hans-Joachim, Dr. (1x), Mineur (1x), Eriksson, Adam (1x)

6.Bb5+ — 0.2% (1 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Akash Langer (1x), Rutz, Alban (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	6.O-O-O	6.Nf3	6.Nge2	6.Bb5+
<1800	23	70%	22%	4%	—
1800-2200	140	69%	26%	4%	—
2200-2600	128	61%	37%	2%	—
2600+	1	100%	—	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	6.O-O-O	6.Nf3	6.Nge2	6.Bb5+
1950s	19	89%	5%	5%	—
1960s	25	76%	24%	—	—
1970s	35	74%	14%	11%	—
1980s	96	73%	22%	4%	1%
1990s	126	64%	30%	6%	—
2000s	92	61%	34%	4%	—
2010s	45	64%	36%	—	—
2020s	8	75%	12%	12%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
6.O-O-O	64%	75%	▲ +10.6%
6.Nf3	36%	12%	▼ -23.1%
6.Nge2	0%	12%	▲ +12.5%
6.Bb5+	0%	0%	+0.0%

Parties historiques

6.O-O-O — 68.2% (304 parties)

1950 — Boleslavsky, Isaac vs Bronstein, David I — 0-1 — Moscow RUS
1951 — Barendregt, Johan vs Oosterwijk, Jan — 1-0 — NED
1951 — Puiggros, Guillermo vs Casas Perea, Fernando — 1-0 — Buenos Aires ch-ARG
1951 — Nielsen, Hartvig vs Al Osaimi, Kaiid Ahmad — 0-1 — Copenhagen DEN
1951 — Letelier Martner, Rene vs Martin M Pereira — 1/2-1/2 — Mar del Plata ARG

6.Nf3 — 26.7% (119 parties)

1953 — Gross, Henry vs Wade, Robert G — 0-1 — Bognor Regis
1960 — Potzschmann vs Schroeder, Raymond — 1-0 — corr DDR
1962 — Faibisovich, Vadim Z vs Nagy, Ervin Dr. — 1-0 — Leningrad RUS
1962 — Neukirch, Detlef vs Golz, Werner — 1/2-1/2 — Gera ch GDR
1963 — Velimirovic, Dragoljub vs Ivkov, Borislav — 0-1 — Zenica BIH

6.Nge2 — 4.7% (21 parties)

1957 — Kallas, Hans Joachim vs Rautenstrauch, Hans Hubert — 0-1 — Zittau
1974 — Harju, Antero vs Laaksonen, Seppo — 1/2-1/2 — UP/10 (Kirjeshakki
1975 — Mueller, Kai vs Bakheet Farag — 0-1 — Leipzig GER
1976 — Mueller, Klaus Uwe vs Grottke, Hans-Joachim, Dr. — 1-0 — Spremberg
1977 — Mueller, Klaus-Uwe vs Kollberg, Lothar — 1-0 — Frankfurt GER

6.Bb5+ — 0.2% (1 parties)

1985 — Akash Langer vs Rutz, Alban — 1-0 — corr GER

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →