C06f — French: Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad, 9.O-O Bd7
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 * ○ Trait aux Blancs
Ouverture — Centre fermé
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plan principal. Manœuvres et amélioration des pièces.
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un fou actif en d3.
Côté adverse. Un mauvais fou en d7 et le roi resté au centre.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c1 et la tour a1).
Plans. Nf3 (35 % des parties) ; f4 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 32 % des parties) ; a3 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 30 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un fou actif en d3.
Côté adverse. Un mauvais fou en d7 et le roi resté au centre.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c1 et la tour a1).
Plans. Nf3 (35 % des parties) ; f4 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 32 % des parties) ; a3 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 30 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plan principal. Jeu au centre (rupture f7-f6).
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de b4.
Côté adverse. Un mauvais fou en c1.
En contrepartie. Le roi n'est pas encore à l'abri et plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou f8 et les tours a8 et h8).
Plans. ...a5 (28 % des parties) ; ...g6 (Préparer le fianchetto — 28 % des parties) ; ...Be7 (Fou actif (mobilité 8), Développer f8 — 24 % des parties) ; ...Nb4 (8 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de b4.
Côté adverse. Un mauvais fou en c1.
En contrepartie. Le roi n'est pas encore à l'abri et plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou f8 et les tours a8 et h8).
Plans. ...a5 (28 % des parties) ; ...g6 (Préparer le fianchetto — 28 % des parties) ; ...Be7 (Fou actif (mobilité 8), Développer f8 — 24 % des parties) ; ...Nb4 (8 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● d4→e5 | ● e6→d5, f7→e6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | — | ● b4 (2v0) |
| Cases faibles | ● c4 | — |
| Centre | ● e4 (2v1) | ● d5 (2v0) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Ouvertes | ● c | ● c |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0) | |
| Bd3 | ● Bd3 Actif (mob. 9) | |
| Bd7 | ● Bd7 Mauvais (mob. 1) | |
| Bf8 | ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 2 (● c1, ● a1) | 3 (● f8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Roqué | ● Au centre ! |
| Droits de roque | — | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | fermé | |
| Ruptures | — | ● …f7-f6 |
| Partie |
|---|
| 1948 Moskou ch-URS – Round 19 – Aronin, Lev – 1/2-1/2 – Furman, Slavomir – G161 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1949 Leningrad – Round 1 – Koblencs, Alexander – 1-0 – Ravinsky, Grigory – G27 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1949 URS Ch, semi final – Round 8 – Arulaid, Alexander – 1-0 – Simagin, Vladimir – G59 1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. Bd3 c5 5. c3 cxd4 6. cxd4 Nc6 7. e5 Nd7 8. Ne2 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Be7 |
| 1950 Schiavno Zdroj – Round 1 – Szabo, Ladislav – 1-0 – Troianescu, Octav – G120 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 cxd4 7. cxd4 Nc6 8. Ne2 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1951 Bad Pyrmont zt – Round 1 – Prins, Lodewijk – 1-0 – Kuebart, Erich – G5 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. Bd3 c5 5. e5 Nfd7 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Nb4 |
| 1951 Mar del Plata zt – Round 18 – Mangini, Jose Henrique de Mello – 1-0 – De Souza Mendes, Joao – G179 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nc3 Nb4 |
| 1952 JUG Ch – Round 15 – Udovcic, Mijo – 1-0 – Ivkov, Borislav – G94 1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1952 Saltsjobaden Interzonal – Round 5 – Matanovic, Aleksandar – 1/2-1/2 – Wade, Robert G – G47 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1952 Tatranska ch CZE – Round 14 – Kozma, Julius – 1-0 – Fichtl, Jiri – G35 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Rc8 |
| 1953 FRG Ch 02nd – Round 9 – Gilg, Karl – 0-1 – Unzicker, Wolfgang – G20 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1953 POL-ch11 – Round 2 – Witkowski, Stefan – 1-0 – Grynfeld, Izaak – G15 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1954 Belgrade – Round 15 – Czerniak, Moshe – 1-0 – Porrecca, Giorgio – G125 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1954 DDR Ch U20 – Round 6 – Muehlberg, Siegfried – 1-0 – Birkholz, Hans Joachim – G30 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1955 Prague tm – Round 6 – Sefc, Jan – 1-0 – Marsalek, Josef – G42 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a4 Nb4 |
| 1955 Zagreb – Round 16 – Karaklajic, Nikola – 1-0 – Porrecca, Giorgio – G164 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. Bd3 c5 5. e5 Nfd7 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1956 URS Ch sf – Round ? – Neishtadt, Yakov – 0-1 – Stoliar, Efim Samoilovich – G119 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1958 Hamburg Ch – Round 9 – Rellstab, Ludwig Sr – 1/2-1/2 – Tscheppe, Karl-Heinz – G22 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. Bd3 c5 5. e5 Nfd7 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Nb4 |
| 1958 Munich olm prel – Round 8 – Van Schoor, Karl – 0-1 – Fichtl, Jiri – G192 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Rc8 |
| 1959 Dresden – Round 8 – Lokvenc, Joseph – 1-0 – Golz, Werner – G61 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Be7 |
| 1959 GDR Ch Leipzig GER – Round 6 – Raetsch, Heinz – 0-1 – Golz, Werner – G31 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Be7 |
| 1960 CSR Ch – Round 15 – Florian, Jaromir – 0-1 – Fichtl, Jiri – G132 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. Bd3 c5 5. e5 Nfd7 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1963 Leipzig Open 6364 2nd – Round 3 – Nicolai, Werner – 1/2-1/2 – Franz, Joachim – G18 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. a3 a5 |
| 1967 DSV-Turnier – Round 1 – Calero Nino, Camilo – 1/2-1/2 – Golz, Werner – G6 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Kh1 a5 |
| 1967 DSV-Turnier – Round 12 – Schoeneberg, Manfred – 0-1 – Golz, Werner – G75 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1968 Lugano ol (Men) fin-A – Round 1 – Ciric, Dimitrije – 1/2-1/2 – Hecht, Hans-Joachim – G35 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. c3 c5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. f4 g6 |
| 1968 Prague U26 – Round 2 – Holeksa, Milos – 0-1 – Janata, Michael – G9 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 Be7 |
| 6. World Blitz 2010 – Round 32 – Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime – 1-0 – Ponomariov, Ruslan – G230 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Nb6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Nf3 a5 |
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1948 Moskou ch-URS – Round 19 – Aronin, Lev – 1/2-1/2 – Furman, Slavomir – G161
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1949 Leningrad – Round 1 – Koblencs, Alexander – 1-0 – Ravinsky, Grigory – G27
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1949 URS Ch, semi final – Round 8 – Arulaid, Alexander – 1-0 – Simagin, Vladimir – G59
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1950 Schiavno Zdroj – Round 1 – Szabo, Ladislav – 1-0 – Troianescu, Octav – G120
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1951 Bad Pyrmont zt – Round 1 – Prins, Lodewijk – 1-0 – Kuebart, Erich – G5
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1951 Mar del Plata zt – Round 18 – Mangini, Jose Henrique de Mello – 1-0 – De Souza Mendes, Joao – G179
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1952 JUG Ch – Round 15 – Udovcic, Mijo – 1-0 – Ivkov, Borislav – G94
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1952 Saltsjobaden Interzonal – Round 5 – Matanovic, Aleksandar – 1/2-1/2 – Wade, Robert G – G47
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1952 Tatranska ch CZE – Round 14 – Kozma, Julius – 1-0 – Fichtl, Jiri – G35
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1953 FRG Ch 02nd – Round 9 – Gilg, Karl – 0-1 – Unzicker, Wolfgang – G20
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1953 POL-ch11 – Round 2 – Witkowski, Stefan – 1-0 – Grynfeld, Izaak – G15
- Lire la suite
-
- C00-C19 1. e4 e6 French defence, C06 - 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cxd4 8.cxd4 - French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line, C06f - 8…Nb6 9.O-O Bd7 - Tarrasch, Closed, Leningrad (1948), SÉRIE C
1954 Belgrade – Round 15 – Czerniak, Moshe – 1-0 – Porrecca, Giorgio – G125
- Lire la suite













1950 — Batchinsky, Basile vs Mueller, Philip — 0-1 — Lucerne SUI
1951 — Mangini, Jose Henrique de Mello vs De Souza Mendes, Joao — 1-0 — Mar del Plata ARG
1951 — Prins, Lodewijk vs Kuebart, Erich — 1-0 — Bad Pyrmont GER
1952 — Kozma, Julius vs Fichtl, Jiri — 1-0 — Tatranska ch CZE
1952 — Henning, Karl-Heinz vs Rittner, Horst — 0-1 — Germany ch-2 5154 final
1952 — Udovcic, Mijo vs Ivkov, Borislav — 1-0 — Belgrade SRB
1953 — Wilde, Gert vs Golz, Werner — 1/2-1/2 — Brandenburg/Havel
1953 — Gilg, Karl vs Unzicker, Ferdinand, Dr. — 0-1 — Berlin GER
1953 — Witkowski, Stefan vs Grynfeld, Izaak — 1-0 — Krakow POL
1955 — Aadhitha Karikalan vs Porrecca, Giorgio — 1-0 — Zagreb CRO
1957 — Burkauskas, Teodoras vs Liebert, Ursula — 1-0 — Krakow POL
1957 — Neikirkh, Oleg vs Fuchs, Reinhart — 1-0 — Gotha
1997 — Schmidt, Roland 1959 vs Graebe, Kerstin — 1-0 — Goerlitz
2018 — Araoz Andrade, Ivan Alexander vs Armando Javier Guevara Escalante — 0-1 — Asuncion PAR
2020 — Doll, Stefan vs Schaedler, Juergen — 1-0 — Baden