C02f — French: Advance, Ruisdonk Gambit

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Bd3 * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 84 % des parties) ; Bf4 (Fou actif (mobilité 6), Développer c1 — 6 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 79 % des parties) ; ...Ne7 (Développer g8 — 10 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	● d4, ● d5
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	● e6→d5, f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	● aile dame 3v2	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● g5 (2v1)	—
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (1v0), ● e5 (1v0)	● d5 (2v0)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● d	● c

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bd3	● Bd3 Actif (mob. 9)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	4 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c2-c3, ● c2-c4	● …f7-f6

Partie
1936 Zandvoort – Round 4 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1-0 – Landau, Salo – G31 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nd7 6. O-O Ne7 7. Re1 Nc6 8. Nbd2 Qc7 9. Qe2 Nc5 10. Bb5 Bd7
1938 Argentina – Round 10 – Piazzini, Luis – 0-1 – Guimard, Carlos E – G49 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Bd7 7. c3 Rc8 8. Re1 Nge7 9. h4 Qb6 10. a3 a6
1938 Leningrad – Round 1 – Bastrikov, Georgy – 1-0 – Zagoriansky, Evgeny – G21 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Qc7 7. Bf4 f5 8. Nbd2 Bd7 9. Nb3 Qb6 10. Nfxd4 Nxd4
1949 BUL Ch – Round 10 – Dimitrov Krastev, Krastjo – 1-0 – Popov, Vesselin – G51 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Bb4+ 6. Nbd2 Nc6 7. O-O Bxd2 8. Bxd2 Nge7 9. Bf4 Bd7 10. a3 Ng6
1954 Cal State Ch Closed – Round ? – Addison, William Grady – 1/2-1/2 – Almgren, Sven – G18 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Nge7 7. Bf4 Bd7 8. Nbd2 Nb4 9. Be2 Ng6 10. Bg3 f5
1959 Madrid – Round 1 – Perez Perez, Francisco Jose – 1-0 – Sicilia Carballo, Mateo – G12 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Qb6 7. c3 Bd7 8. Re1 Nge7 9. cxd4 Nxd4 10. Nxd4 Qxd4
1962 Varna olm – Round 1 – Ciocaltea, Victor – 0-1 – Porath, Yosef – G78 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Ne7 6. O-O Ng6 7. Re1 Nc6 8. a3 Be7 9. b4 Qc7 10. Qe2 f6
1962 Varna olm – Round 1 – Ciocaltea, Victor – 1-0 – Aguirre Rivera, Daniel Arturo – G79 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Ne7 6. Bf4 Qb6 7. O-O Nbc6 8. a3 Ng6 9. Bg3 Bd7 10. h4 h5
Interpolis 1991 – Round 3 – Short, Nigel D – 1-0 – Bareev, Evgeny – G12 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Ne7 6. O-O Ng6 7. Re1 Nc6 8. a3 Bd7 9. b4 Qc7 10. Qe2 Be7
Koop Tjuchem 1996 – Round 1 – Hodgson, Jeremy K – 0-1 – Short, Nigel D – G3 1. d4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. e5 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. O-O Nge7 7. Bf4 Ng6 8. Bg3 Be7 9. a3 O-O 10. Re1 f5

C02f — Advance Variation, Ruisdonk Gambit (1936)

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.Nf3 cxd4 5.Bd3

Les coups candidats

5…Nc6 — 78.7% (515 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Stabenow, Juergen (9x), Gal, Jozsef Istvan (7x), Uhlmann, Wolfgang (5x), Picardi, Angelo (5x), Casani, Rafael (5x), Ferguson, James (4x), Gamback, Bjorn (4x), Lopez Heras, Arturo (4x)

5…Ne7 — 10.2% (67 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Barsov, Alexei (5x), Baumhus, Reinhard (3x), Seidel, Michael, Prof. Dr. (3x), Ciocaltea, Victor (2x), Skalkotas, Nikolaos (2x), Kristiansen, Erling (2x), Uhlmann, Wolfgang (2x), Prang, Edgar, Dr. (2x)

5…Nd7 — 4.1% (27 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Sygnowski, Tomasz (2x), Merry, Alan B (2x), Verneuil, Pascal (2x), Waldschmidt, Georg (1x), Busch, Klaus (1x), Bernabe Monteagudo, Francesc (1x), Thomsson, Hakan (1x), Sikora-Lerch, Jan (1x)

5…Bb4+ — 2.4% (16 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Chuck Schulien vs (1x), Sherwin, James T (1x), Bobovnik, HM. (1x), Altenburg, Frank (1x), Enochs, David (1x), Lynch, John (1x), Wiedemeyer, Dirk (1x), Hommel, Reinhard (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	5…Nc6	5…Ne7	5…Nd7	5…Bb4+
<1800	51	90%	—	—	4%
1800-2200	272	80%	10%	5%	1%
2200-2600	208	75%	15%	5%	2%
2600+	3	33%	33%	33%	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	5…Nc6	5…Ne7	5…Nd7	5…Bb4+
1950s	3	100%	—	—	—
1960s	10	80%	20%	—	—
1970s	34	82%	12%	—	3%
1980s	42	74%	10%	10%	2%
1990s	164	76%	12%	4%	2%
2000s	181	80%	10%	2%	2%
2010s	171	81%	8%	6%	2%
2020s	49	76%	10%	6%	4%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
5…Nc6	81%	76%	▼ -5.8%
5…Ne7	8%	10%	▲ +2.6%
5…Nd7	6%	6%	+0.3%
5…Bb4+	2%	4%	▲ +1.7%

Parties historiques

5…Nc6 — 78.7% (515 parties)

1954 — Addison, William Grady vs Almgren, Sven — 1/2-1/2 — SF/LA, CA
1957 — Svendsen, Aina Marie vs Poulsen, Erik — 0-1 — Copenhagen DEN
1959 — Perez Perez, Francisco Jose vs Sicilia, Manuel — 1-0 — Madrid ESP
1962 — Kerllenevich, Meyer vs O`Connor, Eddie — 1-0 — Los Angeles, CA USA
1964 — Zaiser, P. vs Freyer, D. — 1-0 — cr.

5…Ne7 — 10.2% (67 parties)

1962 — Ciocaltea, Victor vs Porath, Yosef — 0-1 — Varna olm
1962 — Ciocaltea, Victor vs Rivera, Daniel — 1-0 — Varna olm
1971 — Sommerville, Johann P vs Haygarth, Michael John — 1/2-1/2 — BCF-ch Blackpool ENG
1975 — Kristiansen, Erling vs Uhlmann, Alexander — 1/2-1/2 — Polanica Zdroj POL
1975 — Ejsing, Simon Kristiansen vs Uhlmann, Wolfgang — 1/2-1/2 — Polancia Zdroj

5…Nd7 — 4.1% (27 parties)

1982 — Sikora-Lerch, Jan vs Fichtl, Jiri — 1/2-1/2 — Karvina
1984 — Bracco, Paulo Caetano vs De Alvarenga, Reynaldo Augusto Ferraz — 1/2-1/2 — ?
1985 — Bernabe Monteagudo, Francesc vs Thomsson, Hakan — 0-1 — Benidorm
1987 — Waldschmidt, Georg vs Busch, Klaus — 0-1 — Castrop-Rauxel GER
1990 — Reefschlaeger, Helmut, Dr. vs Keitlinghaus, Ludger — 1/2-1/2 — GER

5…Bb4+ — 2.4% (16 parties)

1977 — Chuck Schulien vs vs Sherwin, James T — 1-0 — Kellner Memorial
1986 — Bobovnik, HM. vs Altenburg, Frank — 1-0 — GER
1994 — Enochs, David vs Lynch, John — 0-1 — corr CompuServe
1994 — Wiedemeyer, Dirk vs Hommel, Reinhard — 1/2-1/2 — Augsburg GER
1998 — Babits, Andras vs Haag, Ervin — 1/2-1/2 — Sarvar