B84v — Sicilian: Scheveningen, Classical, 7.O-O Qc7 8.Kh1 Nc6

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e6 6.Be2 a6 7.O-O Qc7 8.Kh1 Nc6 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bB
bK
bB
bR
bP
bQ
bP
bP
bP
bP
bN
bP
bP
bN
wN
wPPion central
wN
wP
wP
wP
wBFou actif — mobilité 7
wP
wP
wP
wR
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wQ
wR
wK
abcdefgh
Plans. f4 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 76 % des parties) ; Be3 (Fou actif (mobilité 5), Développer c1 — 12 % des parties) ; a4 (7 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wK
wR
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wP
wP
wB
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
wN
Avant-poste C (accessible)
bN
bP
bP
bN
bP
bP
bP
bP
bQ
bP
bR
bB
bK
bB
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Be7 (Développer f8 — 79 % des parties) ; ...Bd7 (Développer c8 — 18 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● b7→a6, f7→e6
Passés
Majorité ● aile dame 3v2
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● e5 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● e5 (2v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes ● d ● c
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Be2 ● Be2 Actif (mob. 7)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Bf8 ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 2 (● c1, ● a1) 4 (● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● h1 ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● e4-e5 ● …d6-d5
Partie
1928 The Hague ol (Men) – Round 9 – Wertheim, Willem F – 0-1 – Lokvenc, Josef – G58
1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. b3 b5
1931 Bled – Round 1 – Asztalos, Lajos – 1/2-1/2 – Pirc, Vasja – G85
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Nb3 b5
1932 Bad Sliac – Round 1 – Maroczy, Geza – 1/2-1/2 – Pirc, Vasja – G54
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 O-O
1934 Hastings3435 – Round 1 – Michell, Reginald – 1/2-1/2 – Botvinnik, Mikhail – G24
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 Nc6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Bd7 10. Nb3 b5
1934 Maribor – Round 2 – Drezga, T. – 1/2-1/2 – Pirc, Vasja – G11
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 Bd7
1934 Ujpest – Round 1 – Rethy, Pal – 0-1 – Joyeux Steiner, Gael – G76
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 Bd7
1935 Tatatovaros – Round 12 – Steiner, Lajos – 1-0 – Boros, Sandor – G65
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Bd7 10. Bf3 Rc8
1935 Tatatovaros – Round 15 – Boros, Sandor – 1/2-1/2 – Von Balla, Zoltan – G82
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be2 Nc6 7. O-O e6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 Bd7
1936 Budapest – Round 2 – Kluger, Gyula – 1-0 – Rethy, Pal – G12
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. Bg5 Be7 10. f4 Na5
1936 Budapest IT – Round 10 – Kluger, Gyula – 0-1 – Steiner, Endre – G15
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Be3 Na5
1936 Dresden – Round 1 – Maroczy, Geza – 1/2-1/2 – Roedl, Ludwig – G8
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Bd7 10. Bf3 Be7
1946 Barcelona – Round 4 – Yanofsky, Daniel Abraham – 0-1 – Najdorf, Miguel – G27
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Bd7 10. Bf3 Be7
1952 Vienna 5152 – Round 7 – Castaldi, Vincenzo – 0-1 – Kovacs, MG. – G2
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 Bd7
1953 AUS Ch – Round 7 – Leonhardt, Wolfgang – 0-1 – Steiner, Lajos – G11
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Bd7 10. Be3 b5
1959 OWL Ch – Round 2 – Groenegress, Wilfried – 1-0 – Galle, Wolfgang – G2
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O a6 8. Kh1 Qc7 9. f4 Be7 10. Bf3 Bd7
1964 ARG Ch – Round 8 – Behrensen, Jorge – 1-0 – Cruz, Raul C. – G40
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be2 Nc6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Kh1 d6 9. f4 Be7 10. Be3 Bd7
1965 URS-JUG – Round 6 – Polugaevsky, Lev – 1-0 – Janosevic, Dragoljub – G26
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be2 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Kh1 d6 9. f4 Bd7 10. Be3 Be7
1966 Belgrade – Round 1 – Joksic, Sinisa – 1-0 – Ostojic, Predrag – G11
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be2 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Kh1 d6 9. f4 Bd7 10. Nb3 b5
1971 Moscow – Round ? – Tseitlin, Mark D – 1/2-1/2 – Kotkov, Yuri – G155
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be2 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Kh1 d6 9. f4 Be7 10. Be3 Bd7

B84v — Scheveningen, Classical (1928)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e6 6.Be2 a6 7.O-O Qc7 8.Kh1 Nc6
Les coups candidats
9.f4 — 76.3% (200 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Janosevic, Dragoljub (8x), Horvath, Jozsef (6x), Kirov, Nino (4x), Kotkov, Yuri M (3x), Schmidt, Wlodzimierz (3x), Matanovic, Aleksandar (3x), Velimirovic, Dragoljub (3x), Kovacs, Gabor (3x)
9.Be3 — 12.2% (32 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Janosevic, Dragoljub (2x), Chestnov, Vitaliy A. (1x), Rajkovic, Aleksandar (1x), Ligterink, Gert (1x), Parma, Bruno (1x), Cvetkovic, Srdjan (1x), Ricardi, Pablo (1x), Bielczyk, Jacek (1x)
9.a4 — 7.3% (19 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Storch, Lawrence A. (1x), Muehlberg, Lothar (1x), Govedarica, Radovan (1x), Rajkovic, Aleksandar (1x), Payen, Arnaud (1x), Kabatianski, Alexander (1x), Reinderman, Dimitri (1x), Stajcic, Nikola M (1x)
9.Bg5 — 1.5% (4 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Williams, Leo (1x), Hebert, Jean (1x), Vukovic, Zdravko (1x), Poluljahov, Aleksandr (1x), Steinhauser, Antonin (1x), Straka, Ondrej (1x), Kontrimas, Andrius (1x), Kubilius, Jonas (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 9.f4 9.Be3 9.a4 9.Bg5
<1800 4 100%
1800-2200 60 73% 15% 5% 3%
2200-2600 169 75% 13% 9% 1%
2600+ 2 100%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 9.f4 9.Be3 9.a4 9.Bg5
1950s 7 100%
1960s 7 86% 14%
1970s 31 81% 6% 3% 3%
1980s 28 89% 11%
1990s 70 76% 14% 7% 1%
2000s 82 72% 13% 11% 2%
2010s 35 69% 17% 6%
2020s 2 50% 50%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
9.f4 69% 50% ▼ -18.6%
9.Be3 17% 0% ▼ -17.1%
9.a4 6% 50% ▲ +44.3%
9.Bg5 0% 0% +0.0%
Parties historiques
9.f4 — 76.3% (200 parties)
1952 — Castaldi, Vincenzo vs Kopp, Aleksey — 1-0 — Vienna AUT
1952 — Castaldi, Vincenzo vs Kovacs, MG. — 0-1 — Vienna AUT
1953 — Leonhardt, Wolfgang vs Steiner, Lajos — 0-1 — Hobart
1955 — Maier, Gennadi vs Napolitano, Mario — 1-0 — Bayern
1956 — Bleul, Peter vs Biplab Moran — 1-0 — Beverwijk NED
9.Be3 — 12.2% (32 parties)
1972 — Parma, Bruno vs Cvetkovic, Srdjan — 1/2-1/2 — Umag CRO
1979 — Ligterink, Gert vs Janosevic, Dragoljub — 1-0 — London ENG
1983 — Bielczyk, Jacek vs Flis, Jacek — 1/2-1/2 — Piotrkow ch POL
1984 — Ricardi, Pablo vs Janosevic, Dragoljub — 0-1 — Bratto ITA
1987 — Chestnov, Vitaliy A. vs Rajkovic, Aleksandar — 1/2-1/2 — Vrsac SRB
9.a4 — 7.3% (19 parties)
1962 — Storch, Lawrence A. vs Muehlberg, Lothar — 0-1 — Gera
1977 — Govedarica, Radovan vs Rajkovic, Aleksandar — 1-0 — Zagreb CRO
1990 — Reinderman, Dimitri vs Stajcic, Nikola M — 1-0 — Gyor
1991 — Parmentier, Xavier vs Pira, Davoud — 0-1 — FRA-ch Acc Montpellier FRA
1994 — Payen, Arnaud vs Kabatianski, Alexander — 0-1 — Budapest HUN
9.Bg5 — 1.5% (4 parties)
1978 — Williams, Leo vs Hebert, Jean — 1-0 — Quebec Invitational
1996 — Vukovic, Zdravko vs Poluljahov, Aleksandr — 0-1 — Cetinje YUG
2003 — Steinhauser, Antonin vs Straka, Ondrej — 1/2-1/2 — Volyne
2009 — Kontrimas, Andrius vs Kubilius, Jonas — 1-0 — Plunge

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger