Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés — —
Pions isolés — —
Arriérés — —
Chaînes ● f2→g3, h2→g3 ● e6→f5, c7→d6
Passés — —
Majorité — —
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● f4 (3v0), ● b5 (2v1), ● g5 (2v0) ● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles ● e4 —
Centre ● d4 (1v0), ● d5 (3v2) —
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bg2 ● Bg2 Actif (mob. 6)
Be7 ● Be7 Ok (mob. 1)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 1)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 2 (● c1, ● a1) 3 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Roqué ● Roqué
Droits de roque — —
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● c4-c5, ● d4-d5, ● e2-e4 ● …c7-c5, ● …d6-d5, ● …e6-e5, ● …f5-f4

A91q — Dutch: 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nh3 O-O 6.O-O d6 7.Nc3 Qe8

1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nh3 O-O 6.O-O d6 7.Nc3 Qe8 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bR
bK
bP
bPPion sous pression
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bP
bN
Case forte (2v1)
bP
Case forte (2v0)
wP
wPPion central
Case forte (3v0)
wN
wP
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wBFou actif — mobilité 6
wP
wR
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wQ
wR
wK
abcdefgh
Plans. Nf4 (Cavalier actif en f4 — 44 % des parties) ; e4 (Occuper le centre — 21 % des parties) ; b3 (Préparer le fianchetto — 10 % des parties) ; Qb3 (Contrôle diagonale b3-g8 — 7 % des parties) ; Qc2 (5 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wK
wR
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wB
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
wN
Avant-poste C (accessible)
wP
wP
bP
bN
bP
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bPPion sous pression
bP
bK
bR
bQ
bB
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 27 % des parties) ; ...e5 (Occuper le centre — 19 % des parties) ; ...g5 (Attaque à l'aile roi — 8 % des parties) ; ...Bd8 (7 % des parties) ; ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 6 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1935 Buenos Aires – Round 1 – Grau, Roberto G – 0-1 – Cristia, Jose Maria – G1
1. c4 f5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. d4 e6 4. g3 Be7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. Nh3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Nf4 Bd8 9. e4 e5 10. dxe5 dxe5
1939 Buenos Aires – Round 1 – Petrov, Vladimir (ENG) – 1-0 – Tartakower, Savielly – G6
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. c4 O-O 6. Nc3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Qb3 Nc6 9. d5 exd5 10. cxd5 Ne5
1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A – Round 12 – Petrov, Vladimir S. – 1-0 – Tartakower, Savielly – G227
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. c4 O-O 6. Nc3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Qb3 Nc6 9. d5 exd5 10. cxd5 Ne5
1947 BRA Ch – Round 6 – De Souza Mendes, Joao – 1-0 – Ribas Hector – G10
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3 Qe8 8. Nf4 Nc6 9. Nb5 Bd8 10. d5 exd5
1948 Venice – Round 1 – Szabados, Eugenio – 1/2-1/2 – Tartakower, Savielly – G17
1. d4 f5 2. g3 e6 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3 Qe8 8. e4 fxe4 9. Nxe4 Nc6 10. d5 exd5
1949 URS Ch, semi final – Round 1 – Poliak, Abram – 1/2-1/2 – Kan, Ilya A – G25
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. c4 Be7 5. Nh3 O-O 6. O-O d6 7. Nc3 Qe8 8. Nf4 Bd8 9. Nd3 e5 10. d5 Nbd7
1951 GDR Ch – Round 17 – Stein, Georg – 1/2-1/2 – Kuebart, Erich – G21
1. d4 e6 2. g3 f5 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 Qe8 7. Nc3 d6 8. Qc2 Nc6 9. d5 Ne5 10. dxe6 Bxe6
1957 DDR Ch 08th – Round 10 – Eising, Johannes – 1-0 – Franz, Joachim – G65
1. c4 f5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. g3 d6 4. d4 e6 5. Bg2 Be7 6. Nh3 O-O 7. O-O Qe8 8. Nf4 e5 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Nfd5 Bd8
1959 Buenos Aires JM – Round 11 – Steinbaum, Fernando – 0-1 – Palermo, Vicente – G41
1. c4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. d4 Be7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Nh3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Nf4 c6 9. e4 fxe4 10. Nxe4 Nxe4
1962 Match – Round 1 – Mack Lee, Aizyleen – 0-1 – Glicker, J. – G8
1. d4 f5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. g3 Be7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. Nh3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Qc2 Nc6 9. d5 Nd8 10. dxe6 Nxe6
1963 CSR Ch sf – Round 2.7 – Pribyl, Josef – 0-1 – Skokan, Zdenek – G10
1. d4 e6 2. c4 f5 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 Be7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Nh3 d6 7. O-O Qe8 8. Nf4 c6 9. e4 fxe4 10. Nxe4 Nxe4
Linares 1992 – Round 5 – Karpov, Anatoly – 1-0 – Short, Nigel D – G19
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nh3 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3 Qe8 8. Nf4 g5 9. Nd3 Qg6 10. f4 h6

A91q — Dutch (1935)
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nh3 O-O 6.O-O d6 7.Nc3 Qe8
Les coups candidats
8.Nf4 — 43.8% (78 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Caponi, Saverio (2x), Hammond, N. (1x), Lloyd, DE. (1x), Fernandes, Stefany Lopes (1x), Palermo, Vicente (1x), Pribyl, Josef (1x), Skokan, Zdenek (1x), Dimitrov, Krastjo (1x)
8.e4 — 21.3% (38 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Naumkin, Igor (2x), Arnold, Robert G (2x), Honan, Neill Thomas (1x), Barker, Malcolm Neil (1x), Mostafavi, Mohammadreza (1x), Reilly, Brian (1x), Shilinsh, Georgs (1x), Tal, Mikhail (1x)
8.b3 — 10.1% (18 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Baeriswyl Rada, Fernando Luis (1x), Brent, Richard P (1x), Dornieden, Manfred, Dr. (1x), Heger, Robert (1x), Horta, Hector (1x), Hagelin, Roger Gunnar (1x), Naugle, K. (1x), Levanic, Anej (1x)
8.Qb3 — 6.7% (12 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Gregor, Jiri (1x), Kunc, Miroslav (1x), Blow, Ronald (1x), Glazier, L (1x), Mehlhorn, Uwe (1x), Mueller, Thomas (1x), Turicnik, Vladimir (1x), Arnold, Robert G (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 8.Nf4 8.e4 8.b3 8.Qb3
<1800 10 20% 50% 10% —
1800-2200 63 44% 16% 6% 14%
2200-2600 51 37% 31% 10% 6%
2600+ 1 100% — — —
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 8.Nf4 8.e4 8.b3 8.Qb3
1950s 10 40% 30% — —
1960s 5 40% — 20% —
1970s 5 60% — 20% —
1980s 16 44% 12% — 12%
1990s 55 45% 25% 18% 2%
2000s 49 51% 22% 8% 8%
2010s 31 35% 23% 6% 10%
2020s 7 14% 14% — 29%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
8.Nf4 35% 14% ▼ -21.2%
8.e4 23% 14% ▼ -8.3%
8.b3 6% 0% ▼ -6.5%
8.Qb3 10% 29% ▲ +18.9%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Tal, Mikhail — 1 partie
Karpov, Anatoly — 1 partie
Parties historiques
8.Nf4 — 43.8% (78 parties)
1955 — Drakert, William vs Elliott, Henry J — 1/2-1/2 — New York, NY USA
1957 — Eising, Johannes vs Franz, Joachim — 1-0 — Soemmerda
1959 — Hammond, N. vs Lloyd, DE. — 1-0 — Bognor Regis
1959 — Fernandes, Stefany Lopes vs Palermo, Vicente — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1960 — Dimitrov, Krastjo vs Fraidakis, Pantelis — 1/2-1/2 — Sofia ch BUL
8.e4 — 21.3% (38 parties)
1951 — Honan, Neill Thomas vs Barker, Malcolm Neil — 0-1 — Birmingham ENG
1953 — Shilinsh, Georgs vs Tal, Mikhail — 1/2-1/2 — Riga LAT
1956 — Mostafavi, Mohammadreza vs Reilly, Brian — 1-0 — Moscow RUS
1987 — Radzikowski, Marek vs Nichols, Sam — 1-0 — Vancouver BC CAN
1989 — McNab, Colin A vs Martin Del Campo Cardenas, Roberto Abel — 0-1 — Edinburgh SCO
8.b3 — 10.1% (18 parties)
1965 — Baeriswyl Rada, Fernando Luis vs Brent, Richard P — 1-0 — Wch U20 f-C Barcelona ESP
1978 — Dornieden, Manfred, Dr. vs Heger, Robert — 1-0 — Germany North
1990 — Drolet, Stephane vs Barbeau, Sylvain — 0-1 — Quebec Open
1991 — Eade, Jim vs Lutes, John W — 1-0 — corr NTC
1992 — Naugle, K. vs Levanic, Anej — 0-1 — Charlotte Tch
8.Qb3 — 6.7% (12 parties)
1982 — Blow, Ronald vs Glazier, L — 0-1 — Luzern olm
1986 — Gregor, Jiri vs Kunc, Miroslav — 0-1 — Karvina
1997 — Mehlhorn, Uwe vs Mueller, Thomas — 1-0 — Augsburg GER
2006 — Turicnik, Vladimir vs Arnold, Robert G — 0-1 — ICCF
2006 — Impellizzeri, Francesco vs Biava, Pierluigi — 1-0 — Bergamo