A87f — Dutch: Leningrad, Main Line, 6.O-O

1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 O-O 6.O-O *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bR
bK
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bN
bP
Case forte (2v0)
bP
Case forte (2v0)
wP
wPPion central
Case forte (2v0)
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wB
wP
wR
wN
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wQ
wR
wK
abcdefgh
Plans. Nc3 (Développer b1 — 89 % des parties) ; b3 (Préparer le fianchetto — 4 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wK
wR
wQ
wB
wN
wR
wP
wB
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
Avant-poste C (accessible)
Case forte (2v0)
wP
wP
bP
bP
bN
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bK
bR
bQ
bB
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...d6 (Libérer Bc8 — 96 % des parties) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 2 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● f2→g3, h2→g3 ● g6→f5, h7→g6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● f4 (2v0), ● e5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v0) ● e4 (2v0), ● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (2v0), ● e5 (2v0) ● e4 (2v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bg2 ● Bg2 Ok (mob. 2)
Bg7 ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1) 3 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Roqué ● Roqué
Droits de roque
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● e2-e4 ● …c7-c5, ● …d7-d5, ● …e7-e5, ● …f5-f4
├── A87i - 6…d6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1956) [+0.47] · 88 parties (dont 6 ici)
│ ├── A87l - 7.Nc3 - Leningrad, Main Line (1951) [+0.45] · 61 parties (dont 13 ici)
│ │ ├── A87r - 7…Qe8 - Leningrad, Main Line (1991) [+0.59] · 27 parties (dont 2 ici)
│ │ │ ├── A87t - 8.d5 - Leningrad, Main Line (2019) [+0.53] · 21 parties (dont 1 ici)
│ │ │ │ ├── A87x - 8…Na6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1966) [+0.51] · 13 parties (dont 8 ici)
│ │ │ │ │ └── A87y - 9.Rb1 - Leningrad, Main Line (1990) [+0.43] · 5 parties
│ │ │ │ └── A87w - 8…a5 - Leningrad, Main Line (1993) [+0.50] · 7 parties
│ │ │ ├── A87s - 8.b3 - Leningrad, Main Line (1959) [+0.61] · 2 parties
│ │ │ ├── A87u - 8.Re1 - Leningrad, Main Line (2014) [+0.61] · 1 partie
│ │ │ └── A87v - 8.Nd5 - Leningrad, Main Line (1959) [+0.36] · 1 partie
│ │ ├── A87p - 7…e6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1922) [+0.58] · 16 parties
│ │ └── A87q - 7…Na6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1950) [+0.54] · 5 parties
│ ├── A87k - 7.d5 - Leningrad, Main Line (1952) [+0.32] · 14 parties (dont 2 ici)
│ │ ├── A87o - 7…c5 - Leningrad, Main Line (1959) [+0.72] · 8 parties
│ │ └── A87n - 7…c6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1961) [+0.40] · 4 parties
│ └── A87j - 7.b3 - Leningrad, Main Line (1960) [-0.04] · 7 parties (dont 4 ici)
│ └── A87m - 7…c6 - Leningrad, Main Line (1967) [+0.47] · 3 parties
└── A87h - 6…c6 - Leningrad, Main Line [+0.45] · 0 partie

A87f — Leningrad, Main Line (1945)
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 O-O 6.O-O
Les coups candidats
Ambassadeurs : Malaniuk, Vladimir P (100x), Hoang, Thanh Trang (77x), Pirs, Matjaz (67x), Sherwood, Russell (51x), Marten, Gero (43x), De La Riva Aguado, Oscar (34x), Santo-Roman, Marc (33x), Clares Huanca, Danner Saed (33x)
Ambassadeurs : Bartel, Mateusz (9x), Gazik, Igor (9x), Raab, Peter (7x), Grunberg, Mihai-Lucian (6x), Ringoir, Tanguy (6x), Clares Huanca, Danner Saed (5x), Tovillas, Daniel R. (5x), Deglmann, Ludwig (5x)
6…e6 — 0.7% (115 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Chanda, Sandipan (19x), Junaidi, Barlian (2x), Finegold, Mark (1x), Smith, LL. (1x), Ditt, Egon (1x), Eising, Johannes (1x), Kluth, Carsten (1x), Tomczak, Rainer (1x)
6…Ne4 — 0.2% (30 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Shablinsky, Mikhail Ivanovich (9x), Krahl, Wolfgang (2x), Pichushkin, Vladimir Alekseevic (2x), Milovic, Jovan (2x), Baas, Holger (1x), Rubin Peter (1x), Pieniazek, Andrzej (1x), Petkevich, Jusefs (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 6…d6 6…c6 6…e6 6…Ne4
<1800 665 94% 3% 1%
1800-2200 5985 96% 2% 1% 0%
2200-2600 7299 97% 2% 1% 0%
2600+ 166 96% 3%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 6…d6 6…c6 6…e6 6…Ne4
1950s 42 86% 12%
1960s 121 95% 3%
1970s 318 95% 4% 1%
1980s 922 96% 3% 0%
1990s 3556 96% 3% 1% 0%
2000s 4297 96% 3% 1% 0%
2010s 5467 96% 2% 1% 0%
2020s 1277 96% 2% 1% 1%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
6…d6 96% 96% +0.1%
6…c6 2% 2% ▼ -0.7%
6…e6 1% 1% ▲ +0.8%
6…Ne4 0% 1% +0.4%
Joueurs célèbres
Champions du monde dans cette position
Kramnik, Vladimir — 10 parties
Ju, Wenjun — 9 parties
Karpov, Anatoly — 6 parties
Carlsen, Magnus — 5 parties
Tal, Mikhail — 2 parties
Botvinnik, Mikhail — 2 parties
Gukesh D — 2 parties
Anand, Viswanathan — 1 partie
Ding, Liren — 1 partie
Hou, Yifan — 1 partie
Parties historiques
6…d6 — 96.0% (15358 parties)
1951 — Milev, Zdravko vs Urseanu, Veniamin — 1/2-1/2 — Bucharest ROU
1952 — Pytlakowski, Andrzej vs Partyka, Kazimierz — 1/2-1/2 — Miedzyzdroje
1953 — Kramer, Haije vs Eken, Max — 1/2-1/2 — Beverwijk NED
1954 — Pilnik, Herman vs Tartakower, Savielly — 1-0 — Paris FRA
1954 — Benkner, Otto vs Parliaros, Dimitrios — 1-0 — Amsterdam olm
6…c6 — 2.5% (396 parties)
1956 — Panno, Oscar vs Bronstein, David I — 1/2-1/2 — Amsterdam NED
1956 — Novotelnov, Nikolai vs Khasin, Abram — 1-0 — Leningrad RUS
1956 — Dolezal, Jiri vs Alster, Ladislav — 1-0 — Podebrady CZE
1957 — Ivanov, Pavlin Nikolay vs Neikirkh, Oleg — 1/2-1/2 — Sofia BUL
1958 — Shamkovich, Leonid vs Kotkov, Yuri M — 0-1 — Sochi RUS
6…e6 — 0.7% (115 parties)
1976 — Ditt, Egon vs Eising, Johannes — 1/2-1/2 — Bremen GER
1979 — Bohm, Hans vs Enklaar, Bert — 1/2-1/2 — Amsterdam NED
1986 — Finegold, Mark vs Smith, LL. — 1-0 — Monroe ch-MI op
1987 — Kluth, Carsten vs Tomczak, Rainer — 0-1 — Dortmund op Dortmund GER
1991 — Shanaz, Safira vs Padianis Perez, E. — 1-0 — Mamaia
6…Ne4 — 0.2% (30 parties)
1991 — Pieniazek, Andrzej vs Petkevich, Jusefs — 1/2-1/2 — Mikolajki
1997 — Lapiccirella, Mattia vs Pegoraro, Nicola — 0-1 — Bratto ITA
1999 — Baas, Holger vs Krahl, Wolfgang — 1-0 — DESC E0231 email
1999 — Rubin Peter vs Krahl, Wolfgang — 1-0 — DESC Swiss-Turnier Nr.
2000 — Hagglund, Jan Olof vs Coyne, David — 1-0 — ?