Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● e2→d3, f2→g3, h2→g3, d3→c4 | ● d6→c5, e7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | — |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | ● e4 (2v1), ● f4 (2v0), ● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (2v1), ● g5 (2v0) | ● b4 (2v0), ● d4 (2v1), ● g4 (2v0), ● e5 (2v1), ● f5 (2v0) |
| Cases faibles | — | — |
| Centre | ● d5 (2v1), ● e4 (2v1) | ● d4 (2v1), ● e5 (2v1) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bd2 | ● Bd2 Actif (mob. 6) | |
| Bg2 | ● Bg2 Ok (mob. 2) | |
| Bg7 | ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2) | |
| Bc8 | ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 1 (● a1) | 2 (● c8, ● a8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Roqué | ● Roqué |
| Droits de roque | — | — |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | ● d3-d4 | ● …d6-d5 |
A38p — English: Symmetrical, Main Line, 7.d3 d6 8.Bd2
1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.O-O O-O 7.d3 d6 8.Bd2 * ● Trait aux Noirs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plan principal. Jeu au centre (rupture d3-d4).
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de e4, f4, b5, d5 et g5 et un fou actif en d2.
Plans. a3 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 29 % des parties) ; Rb1 (28 % des parties) ; Qc1 (27 % des parties) ; h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 6 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Blancs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de e4, f4, b5, d5 et g5 et un fou actif en d2.
Plans. a3 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 29 % des parties) ; Rb1 (28 % des parties) ; Qc1 (27 % des parties) ; h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 6 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plan principal. Exploiter l'avant-poste d4.
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de b4, d4, g4, e5 et f5 et un avant-poste en d4.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c8 et la tour a8).
Plans. ...Bd7 (Fou actif (mobilité 6), Développer c8 — 33 % des parties) ; ...Rb8 (19 % des parties) ; ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 15 % des parties) ; ...Bg4 (Fou actif (mobilité 7), Développer c8 — 10 % des parties) ; ...h6 (7 % des parties).
Atouts. Les Noirs s'appuient sur un contrôle dominant de b4, d4, g4, e5 et f5 et un avant-poste en d4.
En contrepartie. Plusieurs pièces dorment encore (le fou c8 et la tour a8).
Plans. ...Bd7 (Fou actif (mobilité 6), Développer c8 — 33 % des parties) ; ...Rb8 (19 % des parties) ; ...a6 (Préparer expansion aile dame — 15 % des parties) ; ...Bg4 (Fou actif (mobilité 7), Développer c8 — 10 % des parties) ; ...h6 (7 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
| Partie |
|---|
| 1920 Gothenburg-B – Round 1 – Carls, Carl – 1-0 – Bergdahl Larsson, Rasmus – G1 1. c4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 d6 4. Bg2 g6 5. d3 Bg7 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. O-O O-O 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. Nd5 e6 10. Nxf6+ Bxf6 |
| 1924 Buenos Aires – Round 18 – Reti, Richard – 0-1 – Guerra Boneo – G32 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. O-O O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 h6 9. Rb1 Qd7 10. a3 b6 |
| 1925 Bratislava-A – Round 7 – Rasovsky, Josef – 1/2-1/2 – Thelen, Bedrich – G11 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. O-O Nc6 6. Nc3 O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 h6 9. a3 Bd7 10. Qc2 Qc8 |
| 1943 Zlin – Round 12 – Prucha, Karel – 1/2-1/2 – Petrik, Timofei – G70 1. c4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 g6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 Nf6 6. O-O d6 7. d3 O-O 8. Bd2 a6 9. Qc1 Bg4 10. h3 Bd7 |
| 1953 NRW Ch – Round 1 – Werner, Stephan – 1/2-1/2 – Wieckowiak, Hans – G2 1. c4 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. Nf3 c5 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. O-O O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 h6 9. Qc1 Kh7 10. Rb1 Be6 |
| 1955 Hungary Ch – Round 1 – Sandor, Balazs – 1/2-1/2 – Bilek, Istvan – G68 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. O-O d6 6. Nc3 c5 7. d3 Nc6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. Qc1 Qc8 10. Bh6 Bh3 |
| 1955 Ljubljana – Round 9 – Grosek, Branko – 1/2-1/2 – Bertok, Mario Jr. – G79 1. Nf3 c5 2. c4 Nc6 3. Nc3 g6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 Nf6 6. O-O O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Rb8 9. Qc1 a6 10. Bh6 b5 |
| 1956 Mar del Plata ARG – Round 1 – San Martin Sanguinetti, Vicente – 1/2-1/2 – Behrensen, Jorge – G1 1. c4 Nf6 2. g3 c5 3. Bg2 g6 4. Nc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Rb8 9. a3 a6 10. Rb1 b5 |
| 1958 HUN Ch 13th – Round 2 – Portisch, Lajos – 1/2-1/2 – Bilek, Istvan – G11 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. d3 d6 6. Nf3 c5 7. O-O Nc6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. Rb1 Ne8 10. Ne1 Nc7 |
| 1958 HUN Ch Budapest HUN – Round 17 – Bilek, Istvan – 1/2-1/2 – Honfi, Karoly – G90 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 c5 3. Bg2 Nc6 4. O-O g6 5. d3 Bg7 6. c4 O-O 7. Nc3 d6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. a3 Qc8 10. Rb1 Bh3 |
| 1961 Bled – Round 1 – Udovcic, Mijo – 0-1 – Parma, Bruno – G1 1. c4 c5 2. g3 Nc6 3. Bg2 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. O-O d6 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. d3 O-O 8. Bd2 a6 9. a3 Rb8 10. Ne1 Bd7 |
| 1962 Leningrad – Round 1 – Flesch, Janos – 1-0 – Gandarias Geller, Marcos – G32 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. O-O O-O 5. c4 c5 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 a6 9. Ne1 Rb8 10. Nc2 Bd7 |
| 1962 Mar del Plata – Round 5 – Guimard, Carlos E – 1/2-1/2 – Panno, Oscar – G51 1. Nf3 c5 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 h6 9. h3 Rb8 10. Nd5 Ne8 |
| 1962 Poznan ch POL – Round 14 – Doda, Zbigniew – 1/2-1/2 – Schmidt, Wlodzimierz – G89 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. O-O c5 7. d3 Nc6 8. Bd2 Ne8 9. Ne1 Nc7 10. Nc2 Bd7 |
| 1962 WT/M/945 – Round ? – Ddamulira Luke – 0-1 – Tiemann, Christoph – G14 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. O-O O-O 5. c4 d6 6. d3 c5 7. Nc3 Nc6 8. Bd2 Rb8 9. Qc1 Re8 10. Bh6 Bh8 |
| 1963 LAT Ch – Round ? – Zilber, Israel – 1-0 – Zdanovs, Igors – G73 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. Nc3 g6 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Bg4 9. h3 Bd7 10. Qc1 Nd4 |
| 1964 Hoogovens – Round 1 – Flesch, Jean-benoit – 1/2-1/2 – Sandor, Balazs – G49 1. g3 g6 2. Bg2 Bg7 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. O-O O-O 5. c4 c5 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. Ne1 Ne8 10. a3 a5 |
| 1964 Zagreb – Round 1 – Udovcic, Mijo – 1/2-1/2 – Parma, Bruno – G6 1. Nf3 c5 2. g3 Nc6 3. Bg2 g6 4. O-O Bg7 5. c4 Nf6 6. Nc3 O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. a3 Ne8 10. Rb1 a5 |
| 1966 Buenos Aires ch-ARG – Round 1 – Behrensen, Jorge – 1-0 – Chemes, Luis – G11 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. O-O O-O 5. c4 c5 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 e5 9. Rb1 a5 10. Ne1 Re8 |
| 1966 Harrachov U26 – Round 4 – Kubicek, Antonin – 1-0 – Augustin, Josef – G16 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 c5 3. Bg2 g6 4. O-O Bg7 5. c4 O-O 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 e5 9. e3 h6 10. Nd5 Nxd5 |
| 1966 Havana – Round 1 – Roux Cabral, Luis – 0-1 – Yepez, Olavo – G2 1. d3 g6 2. g3 Bg7 3. Bg2 c5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. c4 d6 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. Bd2 O-O 8. O-O a6 9. h3 Rb8 10. a4 h6 |
| 1969 Castlebar Open – Round 6 – Brinck-Claussen, Bjorn – 1-0 – Grabow, Pouelsten Holm – G21 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. g3 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 Bd7 9. a3 Qc8 10. Rb1 Bh3 |
| 1969 Schwerin – Round 1 – Schoeneberg, Manfred – 1/2-1/2 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G3 1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nf3 c5 6. O-O Nc6 7. d3 d6 8. Bd2 h6 9. a3 Be6 10. Rb1 Qd7 |













1957 — Pilnik, Herman vs Palsson, Jon Gunnar — 1-0 — ?
1958 — Portisch, Lajos vs Bak, Istvan — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN
1958 — Bak, Istvan vs Honfi, Karoly — 1/2-1/2 — HUN-ch Budapest HUN
1962 — Filipov, Filip vs Prakhov, Valentin Asenov — 0-1 — Sofia BUL
1956 — Sanguinetti, Edoardo vs Behrensen, Jorge — 1/2-1/2 — Mar del Plata ARG
1956 — Lombardy vs Evans, Larry — 1/2-1/2 — Metropolitan League
1956 — Stoliar, Efim Samoilovich vs Kotkov, Yuri M — 0-1 — Kislovodsk
1962 — Ariba Desmond Luke vs Tiemann, Christoph — 0-1 — WT/M/945
1961 — Udovcic, Mijo vs Parma, Bruno — 0-1 — Bled SLO
1962 — Flesch, Janos vs Geller, Adam — 1-0 — Leningrad RUS
1962 — Flesch, Janos vs Geller, Alexander — 1-0 — Leningrad RUS
1962 — Yepez, Olavo vs Garcia, Alfredo NA — 1-0 — Pichincha
1963 — Zilber, Israel vs Zdanovs, Igors — 1-0 — Riga LAT
1978 — Kosny, Marek vs Koziarski, Andrzej — 0-1 — Warsaw POL
1988 — Rubio Purrinos, Hugo vs Hernandez Onna, Roman — 0-1 — Corte Ingles
1992 — Schmitz, Christopher vs Noll, Sonja — 0-1 — GER