A00i — Saragossa

1.c3 *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bK
bB
bN
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wN
wB
wQ
wK
wB
wN
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. d4 (Occuper le centre — 46 % des parties) ; Nf3 (Développer g1 — 15 % des parties) ; d3 (Libérer Bf1, préparer Bd3 — 10 % des parties) ; g3 (Préparer le fianchetto — 8 % des parties) ; Qc2 (Prépare O-O-O — 5 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wN
wB
wK
wQ
wB
wN
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bN
bB
bK
bQ
bB
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Nf6 (Développer g8 — 30 % des parties) ; ...d5 (Occuper le centre — 29 % des parties) ; ...e5 (Occuper le centre — 17 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 8 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans

Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● b2→c3, d2→c3
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (1v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bf8 ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 6 (● b1, ● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Partie
? 1990 – Round ? – Timman, Jan H – 1/2-1/2 – Ftacnik, Lubomir – G1
1. c3 b5 2. f3 Nc6 3. b4 d5 4. d4 Be6 5. c4 Rc8 6. Nd2 a5 7. Qc2 Qd6 8. Qd1 Qc5 9. Rb1 Nxd4 10. Bb2 Rd8
1925 Baden-Baden – Round 1 – Tartakower, Savielly – 1/2-1/2 – Thomas, George Alan – G1
1. c3 Nf6 2. Qc2 d5 3. d3 e5 4. e4 Bc5 5. Bg5 dxe4 6. dxe4 O-O 7. Nf3 Qe7 8. Be2 Nc6 9. Nbd2 a6 10. Nc4 Bg4
1925 Berlin/Budapest/Prag/Wien – Round 3.4 – Schulz, Jan – 1-0 – Steiner, Endre – G10
1. c3 Nf6 2. Nf3 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 d6 5. d4 g6 6. Qb3 e6 7. O-O Bg7 8. Bf4 O-O 9. Re1 Nbd7 10. Nbd2 Nd5
1962 Capablanca Memorial – Round 21 – Acevedo Ortega, Rodrigo Andres – 0-1 – Ivkov, Borislav – G206
1. c3 c6 2. d3 a5 3. e3 e5 4. f3 d5 5. Ne2 f5 6. Nd2 Nf6 7. g3 Bd6 8. Bg2 O-O 9. O-O Kh8 10. Kh1 c5
1962 Poznan ch POL – Round 9 – Drozd, Ryszard – 0-1 – Tarnowski, Alfred – G51
1. c3 e5 2. c4 Nc6 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Nc3 Be6 7. Nf3 Be7 8. O-O f5 9. d3 Qd7 10. a3 O-O

A00i — Saragossa Opening (1925)
1.c3
Les coups candidats
1…Nf6 — 30.5% (979 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Elwood, David (47x), Dehaybe, Andre (8x), Yeremeyeev, Andrejcek (8x), Langner, Donizete Ribeiro (8x), Nguyen-Huu, Hoang (7x), Boixiere, Jean-Pascal (7x), Rogers, Ian (6x), Scharler, Walter (6x)
1…d5 — 29.1% (934 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Elwood, David (16x), Hommel, Reinhard (12x), Dube, Dimitri (11x), Tamassy, Zoltan (10x), Nguyen, Huu Hoang Anh (10x), Vasiukova, Renata D. (9x), Yeremeyeev, Andrejcek (9x), Dehaybe, Andre (7x)
1…e5 — 17.4% (559 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Elwood, David (22x), ? (10x), Boixiere, Jean-Pascal (8x), Fricke, Dirk (7x), Hommel, Reinhard (6x), Peixoto Filho, Antonio De Souza (6x), Hayward, Keith (5x), Brighton Lesele (5x)
1…c5 — 7.9% (255 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Peixoto Filho, Antonio De Souza (9x), Hebels, Albert (4x), Nguyen, Huu Hoang Anh (4x), Dube, Dimitri (4x), Hein, Andreas (3x), Antosik, Alois (2x), Rogers, Ian (2x), Bohnsack, Ralf (2x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 1…Nf6 1…d5 1…e5 1…c5
<1800 342 27% 31% 21% 7%
1800-2200 1560 31% 31% 14% 9%
2200-2600 536 35% 27% 13% 8%
2600+ 7 14% 57% 14%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 1…Nf6 1…d5 1…e5 1…c5
1950s 10 30% 40% 30%
1960s 16 44% 25% 19%
1970s 30 23% 27% 20% 7%
1980s 126 29% 16% 14% 15%
1990s 529 28% 30% 16% 8%
2000s 957 27% 30% 18% 9%
2010s 1013 32% 29% 17% 7%
2020s 530 36% 30% 18% 5%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
1…Nf6 32% 36% ▲ +3.5%
1…d5 29% 30% ▲ +1.0%
1…e5 17% 18% ▲ +1.0%
1…c5 7% 5% ▼ -1.8%
Parties historiques
1…Nf6 — 30.5% (979 parties)
1952 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Juergens, Norbert — 0-1 — Guetersloh
1952 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Koehler, Adalbert — 1-0 — Guetersloh
1952 — De Freitas, Marcio Elisio vs Cordioli, Lourenco Joao — 1/2-1/2 — Sao Paulo BRA
1962 — Maury, Claude vs Pellegrino, Jean — 0-1 — Paris FRA
1963 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Phillips, Alan — 1/2-1/2 — Hastings ENG
1…d5 — 29.1% (934 parties)
1952 — Knighton, F. vs Crellin, R. — 0-1 — Bolton
1952 — Cooper, CF. vs Smith, WB. — 1-0 — Bolton
1953 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Wesselowski Leo — 1-0 — Soest NED
1957 — Dunst, Theodore Alexander vs Halper, N — 1/2-1/2 — New York, NY USA
1960 — Shook, David vs Sloan, Sam — 1-0 — ?
1…e5 — 17.4% (559 parties)
1950 — Mevel, Alberic vs Walther, Edgar — 1-0 — cr.
1952 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Kochan, Fritz — 1-0 — Guetersloh
1952 — Juehe, Heinrich vs Illgen, Alexander — 1-0 — Guetersloh
1962 — Drozd, Ryszard vs Tarnowski, Alfred — 0-1 — Poznan ch POL
1963 — Juhe, Heinrich vs Eley, Brian Ratcliffe — 1-0 — Whitby
1…c5 — 7.9% (255 parties)
1976 — Albert, Karoly Laszlo vs Alexopoulos, Georgios 94 — 1/2-1/2 — Budapest HUN
1979 — Mueller, Peter vs Brauer, Christian — 0-1 — ?
1980 — Welling, Gerard vs Hofman, Arjen — 1-0 — Breda open
1980 — Abdullaev, Timur vs Timar, Zsolt — 1-0 — Berettyoujfalu
1981 — Lieff, Holger vs Werner, Dimo — 0-1 — Duitsland tt