D29g — QGA: Classical, 8…Bb7 9.Rd1 Nbd7
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.O-O a6 7.Qe2 b5 8.Bb3 Bb7 9.Rd1 Nbd7 * ○ Trait aux Blancs
Ouverture — Centre mobile
♔ Point de vue Blancs
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
abcdefgh
Plans. Nc3 (Développer b1 — 69 % des parties) ; a4 (18 % des parties) ; e4 (Occuper le centre — 8 % des parties).
♚ Point de vue Noirs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
hgfedcba
Plans. ...Qb8 (Prépare O-O-O — 30 % des parties) ; ...Qb6 (Contrôle diagonale b6-g1, Prépare O-O-O — 22 % des parties) ; ...Qc7 (Prépare O-O-O — 14 % des parties) ; ...b4 (Expansion aile dame — 8 % des parties) ; ...cxd4 (Capture en d4, Occuper le centre — 7 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Structure de pions
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Pions doublés | — | — |
| Pions isolés | — | — |
| Arriérés | — | — |
| Chaînes | ● f2→e3, e3→d4 | ● a6→b5, f7→e6 |
| Passés | — | — |
| Majorité | — | ● aile dame 3v2 |
Cases
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Cases fortes | ● e5 (2v1) | ● e4 (2v0), ● d5 (3v1) |
| Cases faibles | — | — |
| Centre | ● d4 (3v1), ● e5 (2v1) | ● d5 (3v1), ● e4 (2v0) |
Colonnes et diagonales
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Semi-ouvertes | ● c | ● d |
Pièces
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Bc1 | ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 1) | |
| Bb3 | ● Bb3 Actif (mob. 5) | |
| Bb7 | ● Bb7 Actif (mob. 5) | |
| Bf8 | ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 2) | |
| Paire de fous | ● Oui | ● Oui |
| Non développées | 3 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1) | 3 (● f8, ● a8, ● h8) |
Sécurité du roi
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Statut | ● Roqué | ● Au centre |
| Droits de roque | — | O-O / O-O-O |
Thèmes
| ♔ Blancs | ♚ Noirs | |
| Phase | Ouverture | |
| Centre | mobile | |
| Ruptures | ● d4-d5 | ● …e6-e5 |
├── D29j - 10.Nc3 - QGA: Classical (1911) [-0.27] · 111 parties (dont 19 ici)
│ └── D29k - 10…Bd6 - Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Smyslov Variation (1959) [-0.14] · 12 parties
├── D29h - 10.a4 - QGA: Classical (1937) [-0.26] · 29 parties (dont 22 ici)
-
- D20-D29 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 Queen's gambit accepted, D29 - 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.O-O a6 7.Qe2 b5 8.Bb3 Bb7 - Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line, D29g - 9.Rd1 Nbd7 - QGA: Classical (1962), SÉRIE D
1962 Poznan ch POL – Round 14 – Balcerowski, Witold – 1/2-1/2 – Drozd, Ryszard – G90
-
- Lire la suite
-
- D20-D29 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 Queen's gambit accepted, D29 - 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.O-O a6 7.Qe2 b5 8.Bb3 Bb7 - Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Alekhine System, Main Line, D29g - 9.Rd1 Nbd7 - QGA: Classical (1962), SÉRIE D
1965 EU Ch U20 Niemeyer 3rd – Round 8 – Bleiman, Yaacov – 1/2-1/2 – Ree, Hans – G5
-
- Lire la suite
1951 — Miguel, Nahuel vs Byrne, Robert E — 1/2-1/2 — New York, NY USA
1951 — Evans, Larry vs Byrne, Robert E — 1-0 — New York, NY USA
1952 — Szabo, Laszlo vs Stoltz, Gösta — 1-0 — Stockholm izt
1953 — Horowitz, Albert Israel vs Berliner, Hans — 1-0 — Milwaukee, WI USA
1952 — Incutto, Carlos vs Bartis, Gustavo — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1954 — Moskowitz, Jack vs Amand, Harry — 1/2-1/2 — Hollywood
1956 — Porath, Yosef vs Wade, Robert G — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow RUS
1956 — Szilagyi, Gyorgy Laszlo vs Uhlmann, Wolfgang — 1-0 — Marianske Lazne
1961 — Eduardo, Socrates Alfredo vs Bazan, Osvaldo — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1962 — Schweber, Samuel vs Bazan, Osvaldo — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ARG
1963 — Zelinsky, Yuri vs Klasups, Karlis — 1/2-1/2 — Riga LAT
1967 — Persidsky, Andre vs Golikov, Gordey — 0-1 — cr.
1963 — Khanov, Kurban vs Mikenas, Vladas — 1/2-1/2 — Moscow tt
1965 — Beliman, Oliver vs Ree, Hans — 1/2-1/2 — Groningen NED
1996 — Sahu, Sekhar Chandra vs Hartman, Christer — 1-0 — Wrexham WLS
1998 — Suvrajit, Saha vs Ganguly, Surya Shekhar — 0-1 — Szeged,HUN;August 3rd Thursda