C65m — Spanish: Berlin, Beverwijk Variation

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O Bc5 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Avantages : Bb5 actif, paire de fous.
Faiblesses adverses : Bc8 enfermé, roi noir au centre.
Problèmes : Bc1 enfermé, 3 pièces non développées (B1, C1, A1).
Plans :
● Nbd2 — Développer Nb1
● d3 — Libérer Bc1
● h3 — Empêcher ...Bg4
● c3 — Préparer d4

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Avantages : case forte b4, case forte d4, Bc5 actif, paire de fous.
Faiblesses adverses : Bc1 enfermé, pawn e4 en prise.
Problèmes : roi au centre, Bc8 enfermé, 3 pièces non développées (C8, A8, H8).
Plans :
● O-O — Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours
● ...d6 — Libérer Bc8
● ...Bg4 — Clouer Nf3
● ...d5 — Rupture

Avantages

Faiblesses adverses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

C65m — Berlin Beverwijk Variation

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O Bc5

Eval: [+0.65]

Les coups candidats

5.c3 — 43.7% (3050 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Ovod, Evgenija (25x), Nogly, Christoph (17x), Winants, Luc (16x), Sergiev, Stefan (16x), Finegold, Benjamin (14x), Leko, Peter (11x), Bosman, Michiel (11x), Daus, Peter (10x)

5.Nxe5 — 23.4% (1635 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Ovod, Evgenija (19x), Gulko, Boris (14x), De La Paz Perdomo, Frank (13x), Winants, Luc (8x), Sion Castro, Marcelino (7x), Ledezma Álvarez, José M. (7x), Firnhaber, Ingo (7x), Knezevic, Milorad (6x)

5.d3 — 14.3% (998 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Ovod, Evgenija (9x), Paprocki, Jaroslaw (6x), De La Paz Perdomo, Frank (5x), Tejaswini, Sagar (5x), Costello, Colin A (4x), Chouinard, Etienne (4x), Van Geet, Dirk Daniel (3x), Dueckstein, Andreas (3x)

5.Nc3 — 6.3% (441 parties) →

Ambassadeurs : Enevoldsen, Jens (3x), Rehak, Martin (3x), Winants, Luc (3x), Lima, Darcy (3x), Lasker, Emanuel (2x), Casa, Alex (2x), Larsen, Bent Ravn (2x), Tech (2x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	5.c3	5.Nxe5	5.d3	5.Nc3
<1800	444	43%	21%	17%	6%
1800-2200	1911	46%	24%	16%	5%
2200-2600	1733	49%	33%	10%	3%
2600+	81	57%	30%	7%	1%

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	5.c3	5.Nxe5	5.d3	5.Nc3
1850s	2	50%	—	—	—
1860s	1	—	—	100%	—
1880s	2	50%	—	—	50%
1890s	4	75%	25%	—	—
1900s	11	45%	27%	18%	9%
1910s	6	67%	—	—	33%
1920s	6	67%	33%	—	—
1930s	9	44%	44%	—	—
1940s	20	45%	45%	—	5%
1950s	78	54%	22%	10%	8%
1960s	121	54%	27%	5%	7%
1970s	158	47%	32%	11%	3%
1980s	336	48%	32%	11%	2%
1990s	1369	43%	20%	15%	9%
2000s	2580	48%	18%	14%	7%
2010s	1991	39%	29%	16%	4%
2020s	281	30%	32%	17%	5%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
5.c3	39%	30%	▼ -8.8%
5.Nxe5	29%	32%	▲ +3.3%
5.d3	16%	17%	▲ +1.8%
5.Nc3	4%	5%	+0.3%

Joueurs célèbres

Champions du monde dans cette position

Anand, Viswanathan — 10 parties
Lasker, Emanuel — 5 parties
Alekhine, Alexander — 2 parties
Tal, Mikhail — 2 parties
Smyslov, Vladimir — 1 partie
Kasparov, Garry — 1 partie
Karpov, Anatoly — 1 partie
Hou, Yifan — 1 partie

Parties historiques

5.c3 — 43.7% (3050 parties)

1850 — Bonnerjee, Mohishunder vs Cochrane, John Miles — 1-0 — Calcutta IND
1883 — Winawer, Szymon vs Halpern, Jacob — 1-0 — Warsaw POL
1891 — Lynam, Robert Garner vs Young, Edward — 0-1 — British Chess Club
1891 — Lasker, Emanuel vs W P Lees — 1-0 — London ENG
1896 — Winawer, Szymon vs Heilpern — 1-0 — ?

5.Nxe5 — 23.4% (1635 parties)

1896 — Suechting, Hugo vs Hirschler, Hermann — 1-0 — Eisenach
1902 — Von Bardeleben, Curt vs Lebedev Soler, Andrei — 0-1 — St Petersburg RUS
1902 — D Marco, Gianni vs Mortimer, James — 1-0 — Monte Carlo MNC
1904 — Leonhardt, Paul vs Mortimer, James — 1-0 — London ENG
1921 — ? vs Poschauko, Karl — 1/2-1/2 — Vienna AUT

5.d3 — 14.3% (998 parties)

1862 — Blackburne, Joseph vs Chinnery, WM. — 1-0 — London ENG
1901 — Vergani, Beniamino vs Crespi Pozzi, Edoardo — 1-0 — Venice ITA
1904 — Gunsberg, Isidor vs Schlechter, Carl — 1/2-1/2 — Monte
1954 — Hasle, SS. vs Stender Pedersen, B. — 0-1 — Gladsaxe DEN
1955 — Smyslov, Vladimir vs Dueckstein, Andreas — 1-0 — Zagreb CRO

5.Nc3 — 6.3% (441 parties)

1889 — Burn, Amos vs MacLeod, Nicholas — 1-0 — New York, NY USA
1903 — Spielmann, Rudolf vs Rubinstein, Akiba — 1/2-1/2 — Monte Carlo MNC
1919 — Lasker, Emanuel vs Hannerberger, R. — 1-0 — Bern SUI
1919 — Lasker, Emanuel vs Henneberger, Rivier — 1-0 — Zurich sim Zurich SUI
1943 — Enevoldsen, Jens vs Nielsen, Julius — 1-0 — Helsingor

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	—
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	—	● b4 (2v0), ● d4 (3v1)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	—	● d4 (3v1), ● e4 (1v0)

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bb5	● Bb5 Actif (mob. 6)
Bc5		● Bc5 Actif (mob. 9)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Clouages	● pawn f2	—
Non développées	3 (b1, c1, a1)	3 (c8, a8, h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Roqué	● Au centre !
Droits de roque	—	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● c2-c3, ● d2-d3	● …d7-d6, ● …d7-d5

Partie
1955 Hungary Ch – Round 1 – Bely, Matthieu – 0-1 – Honfi, K. – G56 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Nc3 O-O 7. Bg5 Bg4 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. h3 Bh5 10. g4 Bg6
1955 Zagreb – Round 18 – Smyslov, Vladimir – 1-0 – Dueckstein, Andreas – G182 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Nc3 O-O 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 Bg4 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. h3 Bxf3
1956 Moscow olm prel – Round 2 – Kramer, Hanspeter – 1/2-1/2 – Dueckstein, Andreas – G66 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Be3 Bb6 7. Nc3 O-O 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. Ne2 Qe7 10. Ng3 d5
1965 Hoogovens-B – Round 10 – Giustolisi, Alberto – 0-1 – Van Geet, Dirk Daniel – G13 1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 e5 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Be3 Bb6 7. a4 O-O 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. a5 Bxe3 10. fxe3 Rb8
1967 Asztalos Memorial – Round 15 – Simagin, Vladimir – 1/2-1/2 – Pietzsch, Wolfgang – G21 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. Re1 Qe7 6. Ba4 O-O 7. c3 d6 8. h3 h6 9. d4 Bb6 10. Bc2 Qd8
1967 Paignton Women's International – Round 6 – Blagojevic, Katarina – 1/2-1/2 – Rinder, Elfriede – G10 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 Nd4 6. Nxd4 Bxd4 7. c3 Bb6 8. Na3 c6 9. Ba4 O-O 10. Bg5 d6
1970 IBM – Round 9 – Westerinen, Heikki M.J. – 1/2-1/2 – Van Geet, Dirk Daniel – G136 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Bc5 4. O-O Nf6 5. d3 Nd4 6. Bc4 d6 7. c3 Nxf3+ 8. Qxf3 Bg4 9. Qg3 Qd7 10. h3 h5
Grand Prix de Bordeaux 1999 – Round 2.1 – Shirov, Alexei – 1/2-1/2 – Leko, Peter – G5 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Bc5 4. O-O Nf6 5. Re1 O-O 6. c3 d6 7. d4 Bb6 8. Bg5 h6 9. Bh4 a5 10. a4 exd4
Hoogovens Blitz 1998 – Round 8 – Timman, Jan H – 1/2-1/2 – Salov, Valery – G9 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Be3 Bb6 7. Nbd2 Ng4 8. Bxb6 axb6 9. d4 O-O 10. h3 Nf6
Olympiad 2002 – Round 2 – Rozentalis, Eduardas – 1/2-1/2 – Adams, Michael – G51 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Bc5 4. O-O Nf6 5. d3 Nd4 6. Ba4 Qe7 7. c3 Nxf3+ 8. Qxf3 c6 9. Bg5 d6 10. Nd2 h6
Thessaloniki olm 1984 – Round 2 – Yurtseven, Ahmet Can – 0-1 – Spassky, Boris V. – G14 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. h3 O-O 7. c3 Ne7 8. d4 Bb6 9. Bd3 Ng6 10. Be3 Nh5
World Blitz 2009 – Round 21 – Naiditsch, Arkadij – 1/2-1/2 – Ivanchuk, Vasyl – G216 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. d3 Nd7 7. Be3 Bd6 8. Nbd2 O-O 9. Nc4 Re8 10. d4 exd4
World Blitz 2009 – Round 9 – Gashimov, Vugar – 0-1 – Ivanchuk, Vasyl – G91 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. d3 d6 6. Be3 Bb6 7. Nbd2 O-O 8. h3 Ne7 9. Ba4 Ng6 10. Qe1 c6
World Cup 1989 – Round 1 – Van der Wiel, John T.H. – 0-1 – Salov, Valery – G68 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Bc5 5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. d3 Qe7 7. Nbd2 Bg4 8. Nc4 Nd7 9. Be3 Bd6 10. h3 Bh5

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →