Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	● f7→e6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● e5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v1)	● b4 (2v0), ● d5 (2v0), ● f5 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (2v0), ● e5 (2v0)	● d5 (2v0)

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● e	● d

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Be2	● Be2 Actif (mob. 5)
Bg4		● Bg4 Actif (mob. 4)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	4 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	4 (● b8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	—	● …c7-c5, ● …e6-e5

B01w — Scandinavian: Marshall, 4.Nf3 Bg4 5.Be2 e6

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Nf6 3.d4 Nxd5 4.Nf3 Bg4 5.Be2 e6 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 74 % des parties) ; h3 (Empêcher ...Bg4 — 11 % des parties) ; c4 (Frapper le centre adverse — 7 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Be7 (Fou actif (mobilité 8), Développer f8 — 40 % des parties) ; ...Nc6 (Développer b8 — 22 % des parties) ; ...Bh5 (9 % des parties) ; ...Bd6 (Fou actif (mobilité 9), Développer f8 — 8 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1909 St Petersburg – Round 1 – Burn, Amos – 1/2-1/2 – Tartakower, Savielly – G39 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O c6 7. c4 Nf6 8. Nc3 Bd6 9. Ne5 Bxe2 10. Qxe2 O-O
1918 It (Men) New York USA – Round 1 – Chajes, Oscar – 0-1 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – G4 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. c4 Nb6 8. Nc3 Be7 9. Be3 O-O 10. Qd2 Bxf3
1923 Karlsbad – Round 1 – Yates, Frederic D – 1/2-1/2 – Bogoljubow, Efim – G62 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. Nc3 Be7 8. Ne4 O-O 9. Ng3 Nf6 10. c3 Nh5
1923 USA-09.Kongress – Round 11 – Chajes, Oscar – 0-1 – Lasker, Edward – G17 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. h3 Bh5 7. O-O Nc6 8. c4 Nb6 9. Be3 Bxf3 10. Bxf3 Nxc4
1927 Kecskemet II – Round 1 – Steiner, Laszlo – 1-0 – Berndtsson, Karl – G2 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Bd6 7. c4 Nf4 8. c5 Nxe2+ 9. Qxe2 Be7 10. Qb5+ c6
1951 YUG Ch 7th – Round 9 – Andric, Dragoslav – 1/2-1/2 – Karaklajic, Nikola – G78 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. h3 Bxf3 7. Bxf3 c6 8. O-O Bd6 9. c4 Ne7 10. Nc3 O-O
1957 Sombor – Round 1 – Gligorić, Svetozar – 1-0 – Tot, Bora – G25 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. Ne5 Bxe2 7. Qxe2 Nd7 8. O-O Nxe5 9. dxe5 Qd7 10. c4 Nb6
1957 Sombor – Round 11 – Marić, Rudolf – 1/2-1/2 – Tot, Bora – G111 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. Re1 Be7 8. h3 Bh5 9. c3 O-O 10. Ne5 Bxe2
1958 Munich olm fin-B – Round 11 – Hoerberg – 0-1 – Witkowski, Stefan – G109 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. c4 Nb6 8. Nc3 O-O 9. Be3 N8d7 10. Qb3 c5
1958 Munich olm fin-B – Round 8 – Lemoine, Claude – 0-1 – Witkowski, Stefan – G17 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. Ne5 Bxe2 8. Qxe2 O-O 9. c4 Nb6 10. Rd1 N8d7
1958 Munich olm prel – Round 7 – Dueckstein, Andreas – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G165 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. c3 Bd6 8. Ne5 Bxe2 9. Qxe2 Bxe5 10. dxe5 Qh4
1959 Candidates Tournament women – Round 11 – Gresser, Gisela Kahn – 1/2-1/2 – Rootare, Salme – G44 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nxd5 4. d4 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. c4 Nf6 8. Nc3 O-O 9. h3 Bh5 10. Be3 c6
1959 Corr – Round 1 – Arnlind, Eric – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G18 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Bd6 7. Ne5 Bxe2 8. Qxe2 Bxe5 9. dxe5 Nc6 10. Qg4 Nxe5
1960 Corr FS – Round 1 – Sokolsky, Alexey – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G19 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. c4 Nb6 8. b3 Bxf3 9. Bxf3 Nxd4 10. Bxb7 Rb8
1960 Leipzig olm prel – Round 7 – Konchi – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G248 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. c3 Nc6 7. O-O Bd6 8. Bg5 Qd7 9. Re1 O-O 10. Nbd2 h6
1962 WT/M/945 – Round ? – Tiemann, Christoph – 1-0 – Haufe, Dario – G8 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Bd6 7. h3 Bf5 8. c4 Nf6 9. Nc3 c6 10. d5 cxd5
1963 Enschede zt – Round 12 – Durão, Joaquim Manuel – 1-0 – Philippe, Georges – G61 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. h3 Bh5 7. O-O Nd7 8. c4 N5f6 9. Nc3 Be7 10. Bf4 Bd6
1964 Corr FS – Round 1 – Arlauskas, Romanas – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G14 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. c4 Nb6 8. b3 Bxf3 9. Bxf3 Nxd4 10. Bxb7 Rb8
1964 Zuerich-J Zurich SUI – Round ? – Markus, Marcel – 1/2-1/2 – Holaszek, Hans – G21 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. h3 Bh5 8. c4 Nb6 9. Nc3 O-O 10. Be3 Nc6
1966 FRA Ch 41st – Round 9 – Andersen, Nor – 1/2-1/2 – Bergraser, Volf – G17 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Nc6 7. c4 Nb6 8. Be3 Bxf3 9. Bxf3 Nxc4 10. Bxc6+ bxc6
1975 URS Team Ch – Round 1 – Mnatsakanian, Eduard A – 1/2-1/2 – Gipslis, Aivars – G369 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. h3 Bh5 7. O-O Be7 8. Ne5 Bxe2 9. Qxe2 O-O 10. c4 Nf6
Melody Amber, Blindfold, Monaco 1995 – Round 10 – Polgar, Judit – 1/2-1/2 – Kamsky, Gata – G42 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. d4 Nxd5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Be7 7. c4 Nb6 8. Nc3 O-O 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Bxf3 Nc6
World Blitz 2016 – Round 1.53 – Zhang, Zhong – 1-0 – khayat, Abdullah F – G43 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nxd5 4. d4 Bg4 5. Be2 e6 6. O-O Bd6 7. h3 Bh5 8. c4 Nf6 9. Qb3 b6 10. Bg5 O-O

B01w — Marshall (1909)

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Nf6 3.d4 Nxd5 4.Nf3 Bg4 5.Be2 e6

Les coups candidats

6.O-O — 72.2% (1549 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Sikorova, Olga (11x), Sikora-Lerch, Jan (9x), Simacek, Pavel (9x), Aadhitha Karikalan (8x), Afloarei, Jenica (8x), Clemens, Christian, Dr. (7x), Bergraser, Volf (6x), Spacek, Petr (6x)

6.h3 — 11.2% (241 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Sikora-Lerch, Jan (7x), Zelcic, Robert (3x), Pertlova, Sona (3x), Weinstein, Norman (2x), Geller, Efim P. (2x), Zaichik, Gennadi (2x), Blasco Lisbona, Miguel Angel (2x), Havranek, Miroslav (2x)

6.c4 — 8.7% (186 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Lau, Ralf (2x), Wadsack, Wolfgang (2x), Di Lazzaro, Gabriele (2x), Hrisanthopoulos, Dimitrios (2x), Ignatiadis, Konstantinos (2x), Boey, Josef (1x), Galert, Josef (1x), Batik, Frantisek (1x)

6.Ne5 — 4.2% (91 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Sikora-Lerch, Jan (4x), Rosa, Danilo Epitacio Neves (3x), Klawa, Patrick (3x), Gazik, Igor (2x), Gligoric, Sofija (1x), Bahro, Tom (1x), Derzko, Julien (1x), Bergraser, Volf (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	6.O-O	6.h3	6.c4	6.Ne5
<1800	175	66%	12%	14%	3%
1800-2200	1159	75%	9%	9%	4%
2200-2600	449	66%	19%	7%	7%
2600+	3	67%	33%	—	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	6.O-O	6.h3	6.c4	6.Ne5
1950s	18	72%	6%	11%	6%
1960s	16	75%	6%	—	6%
1970s	61	74%	11%	5%	8%
1980s	93	74%	13%	9%	2%
1990s	483	73%	11%	7%	5%
2000s	779	72%	11%	8%	5%
2010s	588	74%	10%	10%	3%
2020s	106	62%	22%	12%	2%

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
6.O-O	74%	62%	▼ -11.4%
6.h3	10%	22%	▲ +11.5%
6.c4	10%	12%	▲ +2.1%
6.Ne5	3%	2%	▼ -1.3%

Parties historiques

6.O-O — 72.2% (1549 parties)

1951 — Berriman, Grant vs Coosemans, Billy — 1-0 — Birmingham/Coventry
1952 — Janosevic, Dragoljub vs Milic, Borislav — 0-1 — Belgrade SRB
1953 — Chris Gardner vs Sansas — 1-0 — Paris FRA
1954 — Mundaca Ocaranza, Rodrigo A vs Abdulla Naish Naif — 1-0 — Brno CZE
1956 — Janosevic, Dragoljub vs Sansas, Andre — 1-0 — Vichy

6.h3 — 11.2% (241 parties)

1951 — Abdi, Andreas vs Aadhitha Karikalan — 1/2-1/2 — Sarajevo BIH
1963 — Durao, Joaquim vs Weiss, Philippe — 1-0 — Enschede NED
1972 — Weinstein, Norman vs Marchand, Jacques — 1-0 — Montreal CAN
1973 — Nielsen, Jorgen Lovgren vs Wolf, Klaus — 1-0 — Grenaa
1973 — Weinstein, Norman vs Cunningham, Walter — 1-0 — California

6.c4 — 8.7% (186 parties)

1955 — Boey, Josef vs Galert, Josef — 0-1 — Merksem
1959 — Batik, Frantisek vs Bergraser, Volf — 1/2-1/2 — cr.
1972 — Breen, Willie vs Hierro, A — 0-1 — Pula CRO
1977 — De Boer, Gert-Jan vs Van Mil, Johannes A J — 1/2-1/2 — Rotterdam NED
1977 — Kondani Watson vs Fornoff, Robin — 1/2-1/2 — North Carolina Inv

6.Ne5 — 4.2% (91 parties)

1957 — Gligoric, Sofija vs Bahro, Tom — 1-0 — Sombor
1968 — Derzko, Julien vs Bergraser, Volf — 1/2-1/2 — Charbonnieres
1974 — Schweber, Samuel vs Pelikan, Jorge — 1-0 — Pinamar ARG
1976 — Reents, Don vs Berry, Jonathan — 1/2-1/2 — Toronto CAN
1977 — Taulbut, Shaun M vs Werner, Dimo — 1-0 — Bern SUI

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →