A82f — Dutch: Staunton Gambit, 3.Nc3 g6

1.d4 f5 2.e4 fxe4 3.Nc3 g6 * ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. Nxe4 (Cavalier centralisé en e4 — 88 % des parties) ; f3 (Rupture — 4 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Bg7 (Fianchetto, fou sur la grande diagonale — 48 % des parties) ; ...d5 (Occuper le centre — 36 % des parties) ; ...Nf6 (Développer g8 — 11 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	● e4, ● e7
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	—	● h7→g6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	● aile roi 3v2	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● b5 (2v0)	—
Cases faibles	—	—
Centre	● d4 (1v0), ● d5 (1v0), ● e4 (1v0), ● e5 (1v0)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Semi-ouvertes	● e	● f

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf1	● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bf8		● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 2)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1)	6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	mobile
Ruptures	● f2-f3	● …c7-c5, ● …e4-e3, ● …e7-e5

Partie
1926 Hastings Premier /27 7th – Round 2 – Colle, Edgar – 1/2-1/2 – Tartakower, Savielly – G5 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 Bg7 5. Nf3 d5 6. Ng3 Qd6 7. c3 Bg4 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 Nd7 10. Bf4 e5
1928 Berlin Tageblatt – Round 1 – Reti, Richard – 1-0 – Tartakower, Savielly – G8 1. d4 f5 2. Nc3 g6 3. e4 fxe4 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng5 Bg7 6. Bd3 Qd6 7. f4 Bxd4 8. Bb5+ c6 9. Qxd4 Qf6 10. Qxd5 cxb5
1929 Duisburg – Round 13 – Helling, Karl – 0-1 – Seitz, Jakob Adolf – G13 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 Bg7 6. Bg5 d5 7. Bd3 Nc6 8. Ne2 Bg4 9. c3 Qd6 10. Bf4 e5
1930 Kautsky mem7 – Round 13 – Dobias, Josef – 1-0 – Tereba, R. – G15 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 Bg7 5. Bd3 Bxd4 6. Ng5 Nc6 7. h4 e5 8. c3 Bb6 9. Nxh7 e4 10. Bxe4 Qe7
1930 Liege – Round 2 – Marshall Viele, Fabrizio Aaron – 0-1 – Tartakower, Savielly – G9 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng3 Bg7 6. h4 Nc6 7. Bb5 Qd6 8. Bxc6+ bxc6 9. h5 e5 10. dxe5 Qxe5+
1930 Paris – Round 6 – Romih, Max – 0-1 – Tartakower, Savielly – G10 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng3 Nc6 6. Bf4 Bg7 7. Nf3 Bg4 8. c3 Qd7 9. Be2 O-O-O 10. Ne5 Nxe5
1931 Bled – Round 1 – Colle, Edgar – 0-1 – Kostic, Boris – G56 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng5 Nc6 6. N1f3 h6 7. Bd3 Qd6 8. Bf4 Qxf4 9. Bxg6+ Kd7 10. Nf7 Bg7
1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A – Round 2 – Luckis, Marcos – 0-1 – Engels, Ludwig – G24 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng5 c5 6. N1f3 Nc6 7. Bd3 c4 8. Be2 Bg7 9. h4 Bg4 10. Nf7 Kxf7
1939 Buenos Aires ol prel-B – Round 2 – Letelier Martner, Rene – 0-1 – Engels, Ludwig – G7 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng5 c5 6. N1f3 Nc6 7. Ne5 Nh6 8. Bd3 cxd4 9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. Nxh7 Qd6
1939 Stuttgart – Round 8 – Staldi, Cherubino – 1-0 – Engels, Ludwig – G43 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng3 Bg7 6. h4 Nc6 7. c3 Qd6 8. f4 Nh6 9. Be2 O-O 10. Nf3 Ng4
1942 GER Ch 09th – Round 8 – Loose, Walter – 1-0 – Lange, Wilfried – G16 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 Bg7 5. h4 d5 6. Ng3 Qd6 7. f4 c5 8. dxc5 Qxc5 9. h5 Bd4 10. Nh3 Bxh3
1952 Belgrade – Round ? – Fuderer, Andrija – 1/2-1/2 – Alexander, Conol Hugh – G30 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 Bg7 5. h4 d5 6. Ng3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Qd6 8. Bxc6+ bxc6 9. N1e2 Ba6 10. c3 e5
1954 DDR Ch U20 – Round 17 – Moehring, Guenther – 1/2-1/2 – Harzer, Paul – G76 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Nf3 cxd4 8. cxd4 Qb6 9. Bd3 Bg7 10. Be3 Qb4+
1956 Budapest Szikra – Round ? – Kluger, Gyula – 0-1 – Szollosi, Laszlo Sr – G14 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. Nxe4 d5 5. Ng5 Qd6 6. Bd3 Nh6 7. Ne2 Bg7 8. Bf4 e5 9. dxe5 Bxe5 10. Qd2 Nc6
1959 Lodz ch POL – Round 5 – Gawlikowski, Stanislaw – 0-1 – Tarnowski, Alfred – G21 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. h4 d5 5. h5 Bg7 6. Nh3 Nc6 7. Nf4 g5 8. h6 Bxd4 9. Qh5+ Kf8 10. Nfxd5 Nf6
1960 Leningrad tt – Round 14 – Hollis, Adrian – 1/2-1/2 – Liebert, Heinz – G190 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 d5 6. Ne5 Nd7 7. Bd3 Nxe5 8. dxe5 c6 9. O-O Be6 10. Kh1 Bg7
1966 Budapest – Round 2 – Flesch, Janos – 0-1 – Honfi, K. – G37 1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 g6 4. h4 d5 5. h5 Bg7 6. f3 Nc6 7. Bb5 Qd6 8. fxe4 Qg3+ 9. Kf1 Nh6 10. Bxh6 O-O+

A82f — Staunton Gambit (1926)

1.d4 f5 2.e4 fxe4 3.Nc3 g6

Les coups candidats

4.Nxe4 — 88.3% (264 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Gazik, Igor (5x), Leow, Leslie M (4x), Perez Garcia, Hebert (3x), Borngaesser, Rene (3x), Ugrcic, Zoran (3x), Tatai, Stefano (2x), Faerber, Hans Willi (2x), Willoughby, Peter (2x)

4.f3 — 4.3% (13 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Bartsch, Christian (2x), Allain, Olivier (2x), Hadi, Adrian (1x), Liebert, Heinz (1x), Suhr, Wolfram (1x), Hevendehl, Hanns-Adolf (1x), Hamilton, Timothy (1x), Prochnau, Peter (1x)

4.h4 — 4.0% (12 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Flesch, János (1x), Honfi, Karoly (1x), Malisov, Boris (1x), Kupreichik, Viktor D (1x), Gawlikowski, Stanislaw (1x), Tarnowski, Alfred (1x), Reefschlaeger, Helmut, Dr. (1x), Martin-Sommerfeldt, Luis (1x)

4.Bc4 — 2.3% (7 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Comp Kallisto (1x), Perez Garcia, Hebert (1x), Tabernet, Craig (1x), Kernodle, J. Roger (1x), Rajnai, Istvan (1x), Szotak, Laszlo (1x), Sucher, Johannes (1x), Wempe, Juergen (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	4.Nxe4	4.f3	4.h4	4.Bc4
<1800	20	90%	5%	5%	—
1800-2200	138	89%	3%	4%	2%
2200-2600	77	96%	1%	3%	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	4.Nxe4	4.f3	4.h4	4.Bc4
1950s	5	80%	—	20%	—
1960s	4	25%	25%	50%	—
1970s	7	100%	—	—	—
1980s	22	86%	5%	9%	—
1990s	69	87%	3%	3%	3%
2000s	109	88%	6%	1%	5%
2010s	74	95%	3%	3%	—
2020s	9	78%	—	22%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
4.Nxe4	95%	78%	▼ -16.8%
4.f3	3%	0%	▼ -2.7%
4.h4	3%	22%	▲ +19.5%
4.Bc4	0%	0%	+0.0%

Parties historiques

4.Nxe4 — 88.3% (264 parties)

1950 — Kraus, Rudolf vs Diemer, Emil — 1-0 — Bad Schussenried
1952 — Fuderer, Andrija vs Alexander, Conol Hugh — 1/2-1/2 — Belgrade SRB
1954 — Moehring, Guenther vs Harzer, Paul — 1/2-1/2 — Schkopau
1956 — Kluger, Gyula vs Szollosi, Laszlo Sr — 0-1 — Budapest Szikra
1968 — Neis, Dieter vs Henkell, Karsten — 1/2-1/2 — Saarbruecken

4.f3 — 4.3% (13 parties)

1960 — Hadi, Adrian vs Liebert, Heinz — 1/2-1/2 — Leningrad RUS
1989 — Suhr, Wolfram vs Hevendehl, Hanns-Adolf — 0-1 — Landes-Einzelmeister
1993 — Tusk, Kazimierz vs Turzynski, Jozef — 1-0 — corr Poland
1999 — Hamilton, Timothy vs Prochnau, Peter — 1-0 — Parsippany, NJ USA
2001 — Puleston, Tim vs Boivin, Rejean — 1-0 — IECG

4.h4 — 4.0% (12 parties)

1959 — Gawlikowski, Stanislaw vs Tarnowski, Alfred — 0-1 — Lodz ch POL
1963 — Malisov, Boris vs Kupreichik, Viktor D — 0-1 — Minsk BLR
1966 — Flesch, János vs Honfi, Karoly — 0-1 — Budapest HUN
1986 — Reefschlaeger, Helmut, Dr. vs Martin-Sommerfeldt, Luis — 1-0 — Dortmund GER
1988 — Vokac, Marek vs Gazik, Igor — 0-1 — Trinec CZE

4.Bc4 — 2.3% (7 parties)

1995 — Comp Kallisto vs Perez Garcia, Hebert — 1-0 — The Hague NED
1996 — Tabernet, Craig vs Kernodle, J. Roger — 1-0 — Compuserve casual
2003 — Rajnai, Istvan vs Szotak, Laszlo — 0-1 — HUN
2004 — Sucher, Johannes vs Wempe, Juergen — 1-0 — Seefeld
2004 — Oderlap, Zdenko vs Mitrovic, Milan — 1-0 — ICCF

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger

Articles plus anciens →