Structure de pions

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Pions doublés	—	—
Pions isolés	—	—
Arriérés	—	—
Chaînes	● e4→d5	● d6→c5, e7→d6, f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés	—	—
Majorité	—	—

Cases

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Cases fortes	● g5 (2v0)	● g4 (2v0)
Cases faibles	—	● d5
Centre	● d4 (2v1), ● d5 (3v1)	—

Colonnes et diagonales

♔ Blancs

♚ Noirs

Pièces

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Bc1	● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bb5	● Bb5 Actif (mob. 9)
Bg7		● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8		● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous	● Oui	● Oui
Non développées	3 (● c1, ● a1, ● h1)	4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)

Sécurité du roi

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Statut	● Au centre	● Au centre
Droits de roque	O-O / O-O-O	O-O / O-O-O

Thèmes

	♔ Blancs	♚ Noirs
Phase	Ouverture
Centre	fermé
Ruptures	● e4-e5	● …e7-e6

A43w — Old Benoni: Schmidt, 6.Bb5+

1.d4 c5 2.d5 d6 3.e4 Nf6 4.Nc3 g6 5.Nf3 Bg7 6.Bb5+ * ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre fermé

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

abcdefgh

Plans. a4 (92 % des parties) ; O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 3 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

hgfedcba

Plans. ...Bd7 (Fou actif (mobilité 7), Développer c8 — 49 % des parties) ; ...Nbd7 (Développer b8 — 30 % des parties) ; ...Nfd7 (21 % des parties).

Avantages

Faiblesses

Diagonale active

Plans

Partie
1961 Bucharest GMT 5th – Round 4 – Gheorghiu, Florin – 1-0 – Soos, Bela – G14 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g6 3. d4 Bg7 4. d5 d6 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 O-O 8. O-O Na6 9. Re1 Nc7 10. Bxd7 Qxd7
1968 URS Team Ch – Round 1 – Hermlin, Aarne – 0-1 – Tal, Mikhail – G75 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Nbd7 7. a4 O-O 8. O-O a6 9. Be2 Qc7 10. h3 b6
1972 San Antonio – Round 4 – Keres, Paul – 1/2-1/2 – Browne, Walter Shawn – G29 1. d4 c5 2. d5 Nf6 3. Nc3 d6 4. e4 g6 5. Nf3 Bg7 6. Bb5+ Nbd7 7. O-O a6 8. Bd3 b5 9. a4 b4 10. Nb1 a5
1972 San Antonio – Round 4 – Keres, Paul – 1/2-1/2 – Browne, Walter Shawn – G30 1. d4 c5 2. d5 Nf6 3. Nc3 d6 4. e4 g6 5. Nf3 Bg7 6. Bb5+ Nfd7 7. O-O a6 8. Bd3 b5 9. a4 b4 10. Nb1 a5
FIDE World Cup 2017 – Round 3.8 – Aronian, Levon – 1/2-1/2 – Matlakov, Maxim – G368 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 Na6 8. O-O Nc7 9. h3 Nxb5 10. axb5 O-O
Leningrad ch-URS 1977 – Round 1 – Dorfman, Iossif – 1/2-1/2 – Tal, Mikhail – G15 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 O-O 8. O-O Na6 9. Bxa6 bxa6 10. Nd2 Rb8
Leningrad ch-URS 1977 – Round 8 – Dorfman, Iossif – 1/2-1/2 – Tal, Mikhail – G41 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 O-O 8. e5 Na6 9. Bxd7 Rc8 10. Be6 Nb4
SuperGM 2000 – Round 10 – Kramnik, Vladimir – 1/2-1/2 – Leko, Peter – G19 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 O-O 8. O-O Bxb5 9. axb5 Nbd7 10. Qe2 Ne8
World Blitz 2021 – Round 14.51 – Sankalp Gupta – 1/2-1/2 – Saric, Ivan – G845 1. d4 c5 2. d5 Nf6 3. Nf3 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 d6 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. a4 O-O 8. O-O Bxb5 9. axb5 Nbd7 10. h3 Ne8
World Blitz Final 2012 – Round 9 – Gelfand, Boris – 1/2-1/2 – Kotsur, Pavel – G63 1. d4 c5 2. d5 d6 3. e4 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. Bb5+ Nfd7 7. a4 Na6 8. O-O Nc7 9. Re1 O-O 10. Bf4 a6

A43w — Old Benoni: Schmidt (1961)

1.d4 c5 2.d5 d6 3.e4 Nf6 4.Nc3 g6 5.Nf3 Bg7 6.Bb5+

Les coups candidats

6…Bd7 — 49.3% (821 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Kasparov, Sergey (7x), Konovalov, Nikolay (5x), Gdanski, Jacek (5x), Kalinitschew, Sergey (4x), Peric, Slavisa (4x), Markowski, Tomasz (4x), Cicak, Slavko (4x), Gheorghiu, Florin (4x)

6…Nbd7 — 29.6% (493 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Vuckovic, Bojan (9x), Hendriks, Willy (6x), Tal, Mikhail (5x), Torre, Eugenio (4x), Hermlin, Aarne (4x), Heberla, Bartlomiej (4x), Clares Huanca, Danner Saed (4x), Brousek, Jiri (3x)

6…Nfd7 — 21.1% (352 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Van Riemsdijk, Herman C. (6x), Velickovic, Sasa (5x), Sutorikhin, Vladimir (4x), Cebalo, Miso (3x), Minasian, Artashes (3x), Abel, Lajos (3x), Pobor, Danilo (3x), Browne, Walter Shawn (2x)

6…Kf8 — 0.1% (1 parties)

Ambassadeurs : Sakulo, Denis (1x), Remizov, Alexander (1x)

Analyse statistique des coups candidats

Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)

Tranche Elo	N parties	6…Bd7	6…Nbd7	6…Nfd7	6…Kf8
<1800	51	47%	33%	20%	—
1800-2200	480	51%	30%	18%	0%
2200-2600	1016	49%	29%	22%	—
2600+	17	53%	24%	24%	—

Évolution par décennie (% des parties)

Décennie	N parties	6…Bd7	6…Nbd7	6…Nfd7	6…Kf8
1950s	2	—	100%	—	—
1960s	9	33%	44%	22%	—
1970s	30	47%	33%	20%	—
1980s	126	44%	25%	31%	—
1990s	275	43%	31%	26%	—
2000s	532	48%	33%	18%	—
2010s	548	53%	27%	20%	0%
2020s	145	60%	23%	17%	—

Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)

Coup	2010s	2020s	Δ
6…Bd7	53%	60%	▲ +7.4%
6…Nbd7	27%	23%	▼ -4.4%
6…Nfd7	20%	17%	▼ -2.8%
6…Kf8	0%	0%	-0.2%

Joueurs célèbres

Champions du monde dans cette position

Tal, Mikhail — 7 parties
Kasparov, Garry — 4 parties
Karpov, Anatoly — 1 partie
Kramnik, Vladimir — 1 partie
Gukesh D — 1 partie

Parties historiques

6…Bd7 — 49.3% (821 parties)

1961 — Gheorghiu, Florin vs Soos, Bela — 1-0 — Bucharest ROU
1964 — Taimanov, Mark vs Matulovic, Milan — 1-0 — Leningrad USSR-YUG
1964 — Taimanov, Mark vs Matulovic, Milan — 1-0 — Leningrad RUS
1970 — Ranniku, Maaja vs Gordon Noel Pires — 1-0 — USSR
1972 — Archer, Clark Emerson vs Miles, Anthony J — 1/2-1/2 — Birmingham ENG

6…Nbd7 — 29.6% (493 parties)

1959 — Tal, Mikhail vs Benko, Pal — 1-0 — Bled/Belgrade ct
1959 — Tal, Mikhail vs Benko, Pal — 1-0 — Bled/Zagreb/Belgrade
1968 — Hermlin, Aarne vs Tal, Mikhail — 0-1 — Riga tt
1968 — Hermlin, Aarne vs Tal, Mikhail — 0-1 — Riga tt
1968 — Hermlin, Aarne vs Tal, Mikhail — 0-1 — Riga LAT

6…Nfd7 — 21.1% (352 parties)

1963 — Kohl, Werner vs Ellrich, Paul — 1/2-1/2 — Bad Pyrmont GER
1965 — Rolland, Pierre vs Gereben, Erno — 1/2-1/2 — Strasbourg FRA
1972 — Keres, Paul vs Browne, Walter Shawn — 1/2-1/2 — San Antonio, TX USA
1972 — Larsen, Bent Ravn vs Browne, Walter Shawn — 0-1 — USA
1974 — Ruzicka, Zdenek vs Goeth, Jiri — 1/2-1/2 — Brno CZE

6…Kf8 — 0.1% (1 parties)

2012 — Sakulo, Denis vs Remizov, Alexander — 1-0 — Nizhnij Novgorod