Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes ● c2→d3, e2→d3, h2→g3, g3→f4 ● f7→g6, h7→g6
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● e5 (2v0), ● g5 (2v0) ● g4 (2v0), ● f5 (2v0)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d4 (1v0), ● e5 (2v0) ● d5 (2v0), ● e4 (2v1)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 2)
Bg2 ● Bg2 Ok (mob. 2)
Bg7 ● Bg7 Ok (mob. 2)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 4 (● b1, ● c1, ● a1, ● h1) 4 (● b8, ● c8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● c2-c4, ● e2-e4, ● f4-f5 ● …e7-e5

A03f — Bird: 1…d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.g3 g6: 5.d3

1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 *   ● Trait aux Noirs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bK
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bB
bP
bN
bP
bP
Case forte (2v0)
Case forte (2v0)
wP
wPPion central
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wB
wP
wR
wN
wB
wQ
wK
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 84 % des parties) ; c3 (Renforcer le centre — 11 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wK
wQ
wB
wN
wR
wP
wB
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
Case forte (2v0)
wP
Avant-poste F (accessible)
bP
bP
bN
bP
bB
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bK
bQ
bBFou actif — mobilité 5
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...O-O (Mettre le roi en sécurité, connecter les tours — 71 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 14 % des parties) ; ...b6 (Préparer le fianchetto — 6 % des parties) ; ...c6 (Renforcer le centre — 6 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1959 Buenos Aires Ch – Round 2 – Pelikán, Jiří – 1-0 – Abelenda Suarez, Saul – G7
1. f4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d5 5. d3 c5 6. O-O Nc6 7. Qe1 O-O 8. h3 d4 9. c4 dxc3 10. bxc3 c4
1962 Clare Benedict Cup 09th – Round 3 – Jongsma, Alexander – 0-1 – Haygarth, Michael J – G11
1. f4 d5 2. Nf3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 Nf6 5. d3 c5 6. c3 O-O 7. Qc2 Nc6 8. O-O Qc7 9. e4 dxe4 10. dxe4 b6
1963 Fortaleza zt – Round 6 – Rossetto, Hector – 1-0 – Gentil Junior, Luiz – G32
1. g3 g6 2. Bg2 Bg7 3. f4 d5 4. d3 Nf6 5. Nf3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. O-O O-O 8. Na3 b6 9. e4 dxe4 10. dxe4 Ba6
1964 CSR Ch – Round 12 – Kupka, Slavoj – 1-0 – Novak, Ervin – G92
1. f4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 d5 5. d3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. O-O O-O 8. Na3 Re8 9. Ne5 Nxe5 10. fxe5 Ng4
1964 Hoogovens Beverwijk NED – Round 1 – Larsen, Benjamin Holsko – 1/2-1/2 – Portisch, Lajos – G42
1. f4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. d3 d5 4. g3 Bg7 5. Bg2 O-O 6. c3 b6 7. O-O Bb7 8. a4 c5 9. Na3 Nc6 10. Bd2 a6
SportAccord Blindfold Men 2012 – Round 7.3 – Kamsky, Gata – 1-0 – Leko, Peter – G51
1. g3 Nf6 2. Bg2 d5 3. f4 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. d3 b6 6. O-O Bb7 7. c3 O-O 8. a4 a6 9. Qc2 Nbd7 10. Re1 Re8

A03f — g6 (1959)
1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3
Les coups candidats
5…O-O — 69.0% (652 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Van Kemenade, Rudy (8x), Thau, Oliver (8x), Noire, Eric (6x), Preuss, Flemming (6x), Dietz, Juergen (6x), Gonzalez Acosta, Bernal (4x), Shivananda, B.S. (4x), Rodi, Luis Ernesto (4x)
5…c5 — 17.6% (166 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Pelikán, Jiří (2x), Notaros, Krasoje (2x), Pogosian, Vladimir (2x), Siclari, Giovanni (2x), Sancho Ferrer, Juan Vicente (2x), Suarez Castro Aidan Fernando (1x), Eliskases, Erich (1x), Jongsma, Alexander (1x)
5…c6 — 6.7% (63 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Van der Giessen, Ada Leona (2x), Lazarevic, Aleksandar (1x), Radzikowska, Krystyna (1x), Ruf, Matthias (1x), Wutzke, Roland (1x), Heinola, Kari P. (1x), Moilanen, Olli (1x), Handstad, Asmund (1x)
5…b6 — 4.6% (43 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Kaenel, Hansjuerg (2x), Wirthensohn, Heinz (2x), Jacobsen, Benjamin Hojvang (1x), Smejkal, Jan (1x), De Ruiter, Tom (1x), Elburg, John (1x), Sanz Alonso, Francisco Javier (1x), Pomar Salamanca, Arturo (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 5…O-O 5…c5 5…c6 5…b6
<1800 45 58% 22% 2% 4%
1800-2200 432 67% 20% 8% 4%
2200-2600 331 73% 15% 5% 6%
2600+ 7 71% 14% 14%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 5…O-O 5…c5 5…c6 5…b6
1950s 5 60% 40%
1960s 17 71% 24% 6%
1970s 35 60% 17% 11% 11%
1980s 46 76% 9% 4% 7%
1990s 133 70% 14% 6% 7%
2000s 271 67% 17% 11% 4%
2010s 317 71% 18% 5% 3%
2020s 121 68% 25% 1% 5%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
5…O-O 71% 68% ▼ -2.9%
5…c5 18% 25% ▲ +7.1%
5…c6 5% 1% ▼ -4.2%
5…b6 3% 5% ▲ +1.5%
Parties historiques
5…O-O — 69.0% (652 parties)
1957 — Pelikan, Jorge vs Amaro, Lucas Ibrair — 1-0 — Buenos Aires ARG
1958 — Jongsma, Alexander vs Sehlstedt, Berndt — 0-1 — Varna BUL
1959 — Pelikán, Jiří vs Incutto, Carlos — 1/2-1/2 — Buenos Aires ARG
1962 — Rossetto, Hector vs Liebert, Heinz — 0-1 — Varna BUL
1963 — Rossetto, Hector vs Garcia, Horacio Pedro — 1-0 — Buenos Aires ch-ARG
5…c5 — 17.6% (166 parties)
1957 — Pelikán, Jiří vs Eliskases, Erich — 0-1 — San Nicolas
1959 — Pelikán, Jiří vs Suarez Castro Aidan Fernando — 1-0 — Buenos Aires ARG
1962 — Jongsma, Alexander vs Haygarth, Michael J — 0-1 — Bern SUI
1963 — Rossetto, Hector vs Gentil Junior, Luiz — 1-0 — Fortaleza BRA
1964 — Kupka, Slavoj vs Novak, Ervin — 1-0 — Brno CZE
5…c6 — 6.7% (63 parties)
1969 — Lazarevic, Aleksandar vs Radzikowska, Krystyna — 0-1 — Veseli
1972 — Van der Giessen, Ada Leona vs Handstad, Asmund — 1-0 — Skopje MKD
1972 — Van der Giessen, Ada Leona vs Khandsuren, Sandagdorj — 1-0 — Skopje MKD
1974 — Swanson, Stephen vs Deleyn, Gunter — 0-1 — Groningen NED
1979 — Rajkovic, Dalibor vs Odendahl, Steven — 1/2-1/2 — Lone Pine open
5…b6 — 4.6% (43 parties)
1970 — Jacobsen, Benjamin Hojvang vs Smejkal, Jan — 0-1 — Kapfenberg etc
1976 — Sanz Alonso, Francisco Javier vs Pomar Salamanca, Arturo — 0-1 — ?
1979 — Kaenel, Hansjuerg vs Wirthensohn, Heinz — 1/2-1/2 — Biel SUI
1979 — Kaenel, Hansjuerg vs Wirthensohn, Heinz — 1/2-1/2 — Biel SUI
1984 — Shmirin, Arkadi vs Legky, Nikolay A — 0-1 — Kiev UKR