Structure de pions
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pions doublés
Pions isolés
Arriérés
Chaînes
Passés
Majorité
Cases
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Cases fortes ● b5 (2v0), ● d5 (2v1)
Cases faibles
Centre ● d5 (2v1), ● e4 (1v0) ● d4 (1v0)
Colonnes et diagonales
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Pièces
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Bc1 ● Bc1 Non développé (mob. 0)
Bf1 ● Bf1 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bc8 ● Bc8 Non développé (mob. 5)
Bf8 ● Bf8 Non développé (mob. 0)
Paire de fous ● Oui ● Oui
Non développées 5 (● g1, ● c1, ● f1, ● a1, ● h1) 6 (● b8, ● g8, ● c8, ● f8, ● a8, ● h8)
Sécurité du roi
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Statut ● Au centre ● Au centre
Droits de roque O-O / O-O-O O-O / O-O-O
Thèmes
♔ Blancs ♚ Noirs
Phase Ouverture
Centre mobile
Ruptures ● …d4-d3, ● …f7-f5

A00m — Van Geet: 1…d5 2.Nf3 Nf6

1.Nc3 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 *   ○ Trait aux Blancs

Ouverture — Centre mobile

♔ Point de vue Blancs

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
bR
bN
bB
bQ
bK
bB
bN
bR
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
Case forte (2v0)
Case forte (2v1)
bP
wPPion central
wN
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wR
wB
wQ
wK
wBFou actif — mobilité 5
wN
wR
abcdefgh
Plans. Nce2 (91 % des parties) ; Nb1 (3 % des parties).

♚ Point de vue Noirs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
wR
wN
wB
wK
wQ
wB
wR
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wP
wN
wP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bP
bR
bN
bB
bK
bQ
bBFou actif — mobilité 5
bN
bR
hgfedcba
Plans. ...e5 (Occuper le centre — 68 % des parties) ; ...c5 (Frapper le centre adverse — 20 % des parties).
Avantages
Faiblesses
Diagonale active
Plans
Partie
1925 Leningrad ch-URS – Round 10 – Bogoljubow, Efim – 1-0 – Zubarev, Nikolay – G20
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. Ng3 c5 6. Bc4 Nc6 7. d3 Be6 8. Nf5 Bxc4 9. dxc4 Bf8 10. O-O g6
1937 Semmering/Baden – Round 13 – Petrov, Vladimir (ENG) – 1/2-1/2 – Ragozin, Viacheslav – G45
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Ng3 Be6 5. d3 Nc6 6. a3 g6 7. f4 exf4 8. Bxf4 Bd6 9. Qd2 Qe7 10. Nf3 O-O-O
1957 Manhattan CC Ch 5657 fin – Round 5 – Myers, Hugh – 0-1 – Kramer, George – G13
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. Ng3 h5 6. Bc4 h4 7. Ne2 Bg4 8. d3 Bxf3 9. gxf3 Qf6 10. Rg1 Nc6
1958 Buenos Aires V – Round 5 – Emma, Jaime – 1/2-1/2 – Buj, Pablo – G21
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. Ng3 Ne7 6. Bc4 Ng6 7. d3 h6 8. O-O Nd7 9. c3 dxc3 10. bxc3 Nf6
1960 Buenos Aires ch-ARG – Round 14 – Foguelman – 0-1 – Alvarez De Espejo Montiel, Miguel – G101
1. e4 d5 2. Nc3 d4 3. Nb1 e5 4. d3 c5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Be2 Nge7 7. Nbd2 Ng6 8. O-O Be6 9. Ne1 Qd7 10. g3 Bh3
1962 DDR-12ch – Round 17 – Storch, Lawrence A. – 1/2-1/2 – Zinn, Lothar – G10
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 c5 4. Ng3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nc6 6. d3 h5 7. h3 e5 8. Nf3 h4 9. Ne2 Be7 10. Ng5 Rf8
1964 IBM – Round 3 – Van Geet, Dirk Daniel – 0-1 – Pirc, Vasja – G17
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Ng3 Be6 5. c3 c5 6. Bb5+ Nd7 7. Qh5 Bd6 8. Nf5 Bxf5 9. Qxf5 Ne7 10. Qg4 Ng6
1967 Hoogovens – Round 15 – Van Geet, Dirk Daniel – 1/2-1/2 – Spassky, Boris V. – G100
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nb1 e5 4. Bc4 Bd6 5. d3 Nf6 6. Ne2 Nc6 7. c3 dxc3 8. Nbxc3 O-O 9. Bg5 h6 10. Bh4 Be7
1967 Rubinstein Memorial – Round 3 – Suttles, Duncan – 0-1 – Furman, Slavomir – G9
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. d3 Nc6 5. g3 h5 6. Bg2 h4 7. Nh3 Be7 8. f4 hxg3 9. hxg3 exf4 10. gxf4 Bg4
1967 Rubinstein Memorial 5th – Round 3 – Suttles, Duncan – 0-1 – Furman, Semyon – G2
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. d3 Nc6 5. g3 h5 6. Bg2 h4 7. Nh3 Be7 8. f4 hxg3 9. hxg3 exf4 10. gxf4 Bg4
1968 IBM-B – Round 6 – Van Geet, Dirk Daniel – 0-1 – Van Scheltinga, Theo – G22
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Ng3 g6 5. c3 c5 6. Bc4 Bd6 7. d3 h5 8. Nf3 h4 9. Ne2 h3 10. g3 Nc6
1969 Buenos Aires ch-ARG – Round 8 – Abraira Rodriguez, Alicia – 1-0 – Benko, Francisco – G34
1. e4 d5 2. Nc3 d4 3. Nce2 Nc6 4. c4 Nf6 5. d3 e5 6. a3 a5 7. h3 h5 8. f4 exf4 9. Bxf4 Bd6 10. Nf3 Bxf4
1969 It Bad Pyrmont GER – Round 6 – Segal, Alexandru Sorin – 1-0 – Corden, Martyn J – G10
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. d3 c5 5. f4 Nc6 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. fxe5 Bxf3 8. gxf3 Nxe5 9. Ng3 Qh4 10. Qe2 Ng6
8. Tal Mem Blitz 2013 – Round 8 – Andreikin, Dmitry – 1-0 – Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar – G35
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Ng3 g6 5. Bc4 Bg7 6. d3 h5 7. f4 h4 8. N3e2 Nc6 9. h3 Na5 10. Bd5 c6
World Blitz 2015 – Round 21.7 – Andreikin, Dmitry – 0-1 – Svidler, Peter – G1339
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 c5 4. Ng3 Nc6 5. Bc4 a6 6. d3 e6 7. a4 Bd6 8. f4 e5 9. f5 Nf6 10. Nh5 g6
World Blitz 2022 – Round 9.43 – Khusnutdinov, Rafael – 1-0 – Predke, Alexandr – G480
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. Ng3 Ne7 6. Bc4 h6 7. d3 c5 8. O-O Nbc6 9. a3 a6 10. Nh4 g6
World Blitz 2023 – Round 11.22 – Khusnutdinov, Rafael – 0-1 – Martirosyan, Haik M. – G634
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 c5 4. f4 Nc6 5. Nf3 g6 6. Ng3 Bg7 7. Bc4 Na5 8. Bb5+ Bd7 9. Bxd7+ Qxd7 10. d3 Nc6
World Blitz 2023 – Round 15.32 – Predke, Alexandr – 1-0 – Rakhmanov, Aleksandr – G864
1. e4 d5 2. Nc3 d4 3. Nce2 e5 4. Ng3 Be6 5. Nf3 f6 6. Bb5+ Nc6 7. O-O Bc5 8. c3 Ne7 9. d3 a6 10. cxd4 Bxd4
World Blitz 2023 – Round 9.21 – Khusnutdinov, Rafael – 0-1 – Van Foreest, Jorden – G517
1. Nc3 d5 2. e4 d4 3. Nce2 Nc6 4. Nf3 h5 5. c3 e5 6. cxd4 exd4 7. Nf4 g5 8. Nd5 g4 9. Ng1 Be6 10. Nf4 Nf6

A00m — Van Geet (1925)
1.Nc3 d5 2.e4 d4
Les coups candidats
3.Nce2 — 90.4% (5938 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Kokorin, Vladimir Nikolaevich (98x), Larsson, Mats (72x), Roques, Pascal (36x), Henri, James (30x), Hermlin, Aarne (27x), Moody, David W (24x), Ekebjaerg, Ove (21x), Bastian, Jochen (20x)
3.Nd5 — 4.1% (268 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Prosch, Katharina (3x), Heremans, Dries (2x), Gohla, Ulf (2x), Leemoon, Brian (2x), Tossien, T. (1x), Blackstone, John (1x), Toth, Andras (1x), Eberth, Zoltan Bela (1x)
3.Nb1 — 2.8% (181 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Krawczyk, Wieslaw (4x), Olthof, Rene (3x), Hohm, Klemens (2x), Semrl, Marjan (2x), Glasscoe, Alan (2x), Stanek, Bohumil (2x), Faleg, Alberto (1x), Badiola De Miguel, Carlos (1x)
3.Nb5 — 1.5% (96 parties)
Ambassadeurs : Kool, Annelies (1x), Struik, Tjapko (1x), Vranova, Jarmila (1x), Funkova, Hana (1x), Morris, Daniel (1x), Anderson Harris (1x), Melinte, Cristian (1x), Garban, Alexandru (1x)
Analyse statistique des coups candidats
Répartition par niveau Elo (% des parties)
Tranche Elo N parties 3.Nce2 3.Nd5 3.Nb1 3.Nb5
<1800 598 83% 8% 4% 4%
1800-2200 3178 96% 1% 3% 0%
2200-2600 1076 98% 0% 1%
2600+ 11 100%
Évolution par décennie (% des parties)
Décennie N parties 3.Nce2 3.Nd5 3.Nb1 3.Nb5
1950s 16 100%
1960s 40 92% 2% 5%
1970s 43 95% 5%
1980s 148 91% 1% 9%
1990s 1367 91% 4% 3% 1%
2000s 2333 89% 5% 2% 2%
2010s 2096 92% 3% 3% 1%
2020s 526 87% 6% 4% 2%
Tendances récentes (2010s → 2020s)
Coup 2010s 2020s Δ
3.Nce2 92% 87% ▼ -4.6%
3.Nd5 3% 6% ▲ +2.4%
3.Nb1 3% 4% ▲ +0.9%
3.Nb5 1% 2% ▲ +0.7%
Parties historiques
3.Nce2 — 90.4% (5938 parties)
1950 — Hanke, Leonhard vs Diemer, Emil — 1-0 — ?
1952 — Hanke, Danny vs Thiermann, O. — 0-1 — Wangen
1953 — Raetsch, Heinz vs Schaffer, Josef — 1-0 — Brandenburg/Havel
1954 — Bills, William vs Schwartz, Ilan S — 1-0 — New Orleans, LA USA
1954 — Santasiere, Anthony vs Saidy, Anthony — 0-1 — New Orleans, LA USA
3.Nd5 — 4.1% (268 parties)
1962 — Tossien, T. vs Blackstone, John — 0-1 — No. CA
1987 — Toth, Andras vs Eberth, Zoltan Bela — 0-1 — Mezokovesd
1991 — Oyens, Conrad vs Medina-Garcia, Antonio — 0-1 — Cordoba ARG
1992 — Garcia, David vs Llaneza Vega, Patricia — 0-1 — Asturias Juvenil
1993 — Camara M, Alejandra vs Munoz, William — 0-1 — Merida MEX
3.Nb1 — 2.8% (181 parties)
1960 — Faleg, Alberto vs Badiola De Miguel, Carlos — 0-1 — Buenos Aires ch-ARG
1967 — Van Geet, Dirk Daniel vs Spassky, Boris V. — 1/2-1/2 — Beverwijk NED
1978 — Broekhuis vs Kranenburg, Kees — 0-1 — ?
1979 — Abate, Luigi vs Tepper, Dieter — 1-0 — Schonach
1981 — Schlenker, Rainer vs Kellermann, Laszlo — 1-0 — Tubingen
3.Nb5 — 1.5% (96 parties)
1991 — Chansavang, Albain vs Lebedel, Gerard — 1-0 — Torcy
1993 — Morris, Daniel vs Anderson Harris — 0-1 — ?
1993 — Liskova, B. vs Dvorakova Miculkova, Magdalena — 1-0 — Chrudim
1994 — Vranova, Jarmila vs Funkova, Hana — 1-0 — Prerov,CZE ch-Moravia wmn ope
1994 — Choate, Eric vs Chantal Simons — 0-1 — Detroit ch-MI opB

Fin du contenu

Aucune page supplémentaire à charger